Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

JFL Paradoxically, only asexual aromantics should reproduce

  • Thread starter Destroyed lonely
  • Start date
Destroyed lonely

Destroyed lonely

Banned
-
Joined
Feb 18, 2024
Posts
1,629
I strongly doubt their existence but if they're real, they're the superior subgroup of humanity

Mental suffering is a measurement of unfulfilled desires, it has two elements: desire + unfulfillment, if you have a need and it's met, there is no suffering, but if you have no need in the first place, there is also no suffering, the difference is there is always a possibility of unfulfillment, even chad and stacy can have a subhuman kid because of genetic mutations or accidents (burn victims for example) but the absence of a need is a permanent immutable solution

Do you realize that we are being defective animals when we crave romantic feminine companion and then complain about not having it, the desire comes before the unfulfillment and the greatest ascension is not having that desire in the first place

We are all like meth addicts and true asexuals (if they exist) are like people who aren't addicted to meth, reproduction for the sole purpose of continuing life should be done by them
 
Last edited:
@CopingForBrutality @Cybersex is our hope @Bianor
 
Asexuality doesn't exis, jfl
 
Being aromantic would be enough, probably.
 
But there's also the theory that romanticism doesn't actually exist and it's all just lust, even if it exists it's a product of lust
I mean if you just simply want to ejaculate, doesn't matter in what way exactly, then you can just satisfy your needs by masturbation. I feel like aromantic people don't really need to receive validation from foids.
 
then you can just satisfy your needs by masturbation
A lustful person will always think the real thing is better because he's imagining/ seeing objects when masturbating so he will always want to experience it up close with other sensory experiences, the scenario you're describing is theoretically impossible unless the person masturbates with the thought of NOTHING and just jerks off looking at an empty wall while not imagining anything
 
Last edited:
A lustful person will always think the real thing is better because he's imagining/ seeing objects when masturbating so he will always want to experience it up close with other sensory experiences, the scenario you're describing is theoretically impossible unless the person masturbates with the thought of NOTHING and just jerks off looking at a white wall
But maybe then he'd be satisfied just by having sex with a prostitute. So, the only problem would be that prostitutes aren't cheap.
 
But maybe then he'd be satisfied just by having sex with a prostitute. So, the only problem would be that prostitutes aren't cheap.
Exactly, that's why I'd unironically be content with visiting whores but where I live they're illegal

People might say "well uh that's not real because she doesn't want you" but they're not fully blackpilled to realize the only reason women like chad is his looks so it's still conditional love not much different than the money you'd give to a whore, and people who wish to be good looking for the sake of it just want to mog others (pride)

In the end, the entire issue of inceldom is nothing more than unfulfilled Lust & Pride
 
@pugmalion masturbates to math equations
 

Similar threads

brazi
Replies
15
Views
240
sinclair_silence
sinclair_silence
B
Replies
4
Views
149
Darth Aries
Darth Aries
SlayerSlayer
Replies
10
Views
297
Indari
Indari
LostSoulUK
Replies
13
Views
248
SupremeGentleCel
SupremeGentleCel
AngryUbermensch
Replies
35
Views
764
OutcompetedByRoomba
OutcompetedByRoomba

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top