Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Serious [Poll] What is the Economic views of Incels.co?

What best describes your Economic viewpoint?

  • Strong Leftist (Anarchist, Orthodox Marxist, planned-economy)

    Votes: 6 13.3%
  • Soft Leftist (Democratic Socialism, Market Socialism, Social Democrats)

    Votes: 9 20.0%
  • Centrists (Neoliberals, Pro-Corporate, Fiscally Liberal)

    Votes: 5 11.1%
  • Right Leaning (Fiscally Conservative, Small Government)

    Votes: 16 35.6%
  • Hard Right Leaning (Libertarian, Ancap)

    Votes: 9 20.0%

  • Total voters
    45
B

BlackpillMafia

Banned
-
Joined
Jan 12, 2019
Posts
424
While there is a lot of cultural/societal critique on this website, I hardly see anyone discuss economics as economics has a strong tie between culture. We work 40 hours a week at some job, spend lots of our time consuming and purchasing, and our politics largely revolve around Economics rather than social/cultural issues. So i'd like to hear the economic opinions of people here and how it may tie back to inceldom. (Ie: many people believe capitalism and consumerism has partially caused inceldom, or that fiscally liberal policies like welfare did it, etc.) BTW your economic opinions dont have to be tied to who generally follows the economic school of thought (not all socialists are progressive, not all libertarians are conservative). I tried to keep the poll simple, but if I missed anything let me know.
 
Consumerism is another name for hedonism, and degeneracy is another name for hedonism. Capitalism lives on consumerism and inceldom is mainly a by product of degeneracy and hedonism.
 
Anything rhat gives me NEETbux to LDAR
 
Planned Economy and Anarchists in the same category?
Planned economy, fuck capitalists who destroy the environment and society for profit
 
I don't know. We're not really built to be living how we're living, nothing is going to work. I'm distrustful of central planning, but I'm also not a fan of the crony capitalism we have now (which is basically soft communism, state and corporation working in harmony).

Also, not blaming you because this is the usual view, but the idea that anarchists are strong left kinda confuses me. The opposite of ancap is "anarcho-syndicalism", which as far as I can tell is a contradiction.
 
Planned Economy and Anarchists in the same category?
Planned economy, fuck capitalists who destroy the environment and society for profit

Planned economies never work
 
I view modern political and economical schools as ultimately flawed. I think we should implement digital version of Freigeld, make banks work more as in islamic countries, create strict control over monopolies, fracture power of the government between major institutes and militarize each of them.
 
as long as you can buy more money with money nothing will change.

every economist, etc. should be sent to gulag.
 
121175
 
that quote literally just describeds liberalism, which isnt socialist in nature
National Socialism is called Corporatist, Socialist, Liberal, Conservative, Fascist, Libertarian, how can one ideology be this many things?
121177
 
Right now I want small government involment in economics, but I still dont find any view perfect. I also think that different economic policies might be more usefull during times of crisis.
 
Right-wing tbh
 
National Socialism is called Corporatist, Socialist, Liberal, Conservative, Fascist, Libertarian, how can one ideology be this many things?
View attachment 121177

Just because people call it all those things doesnt mean it is. But what the quote was describing (mainly pushing for individualism) is certainly liberal.
 
Just because people call it all those things doesnt mean it is. But what the quote was describing (mainly pushing for individualism) is certainly liberal.
Okay, but just because there are individualist ideas in an ideology doesn't make it an individualist ideology.
 
Okay, but just because there are individualist ideas in an ideology doesn't make it an individualist ideology.

If we look at Wikipedia on Individualism

Individualism makes the individual its focus and so starts "with the fundamental premise that the human individual is of primary importance in the struggle for liberation." Classical liberalism, existentialism, and anarchism are examples of movements that take the human individual as a central unit of analysis.

Sure yes individualism is a component of some other political ideologies, but individualism is very foundational to liberalism. Well none of this matters anyways its all semantics.
 
Sure yes individualism is a component of some other political ideologies, but individualism is very foundational to liberalism. Well none of this matters anyways its all semantics.
Okay but Individualism is far from the foundation of National Socialism
 
Right leaning but surely not all the way. A totally free market cannot possibly succeed in the long term.

Globalisation is terrible for the economy because instead of giving our own people jobs, we are using cheap labour from overseas. This will cause mass unemployment in our own country. This means there will be lower disposable incomes of consumers, so the business will get less profit. Therefore, using cheap labour from overseas will lead to you losing profit.

Allowing all things to be sold on the 'free market' will encourage degeneracy. A 'laissez-faire' economic system allows people to buy and sell drugs, prostitutes, and other degenerate products. This will just create more degenerates, which is why we need to keep those sorts of things illegal.
 
Right leaning but surely not all the way. A totally free market cannot possibly succeed in the long term.

You just described why right leaning economics is flawed right after you said you were right leaning. Well its ok, tbh i think these things are more a problem with neoliberalism than with right leaning economics.
 
You just described why right leaning economics is flawed right after you said you were right leaning. Well its ok, tbh i think these things are more a problem with neoliberalism than with right leaning economics.
I prefer right leaning economics because it's all about actually earning your money instead of being given free money by the government. Left wing economics pushes the idea that everyone should be forced to share their money with each other so everyone has an equal amount, which is a disgusting ideology.
I think taxes are too high, and a progressive tax punishes people for working harder. A regressive tax would reward hard work.
The government needs to stop spending so much on welfare, as it just promotes a useless lifestyle. Getting rid of unemployment benefits would encourage people to actually get a job instead of leeching off the government.
I think a semi-free market would be able to work. Protectionism would be necessary to keep unemployment low in our own country. Some goods would need to be banned. Other than that, a free market works relatively well.
 
I want free shit because I have autism and I'm sub6. That's my view.
 
Anarcho-capitalist. Working is the only thing that will help me afford my copes and this way I don't have to pay for cunt's kids.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top