Yeah, you've probably heard about it at this point, but if you haven't, here's the gist of it. The Prime Minister of Finland is a 36-year-old femoid, and unsurprisingly prioritizes partying over policymaking.
Actually, "partying" would be an understatement. Sanna Marin was ostensibly recorded in a room where other partygoers were talking about drugs. Oh, and two random femoid celebrities were photographed topless and kissing in her official residence.
View: https://twitter.com/InsiderNewsKe/status/1562136711076974597
Some people in Finland are, of course, upset about this. Perhaps they think that topless photos are beneath the decorum expected of a head of government's official residence. Or maybe, because Finland shares a 1,340-km long border with a violently expansionist Russia, there are better things to do than to party. There are many legitimate reasons for Finns to disapprove of their own Prime Minister's off-work activities.
As if on cue, soycucks and feminazis inside and outside of Finland have reflexively defended Sanna Marin by resorting to their tried-and-tested tactic of accusing anybody who criticizes her of "misogyny". HOW DARE YOU DISAPPROVE OF MUH QWEENZ?
That's absurd. Older male politicians are criticized all the time for their activities outside of work, for activities far more benign than wild partying.
Take golf, for example:
It's not just Donald Trump who gets criticized for off-work activities, like golfing. Apparently, even liberal male politicians get criticized for it, too:
I'm not suggesting, of course, that male politicians should be immune to criticism. Far from it. Here's my point: being a head of state or government isn't a 9-to-5 commitment. If you choose to become a career politician, every single thing you have done or will ever do in your life will be scrutinized, even if it's "off-work". Why should the rules be any different for Sanna Marin?
What's ridiculous here is that soys and feminists think female politicians should be immune to criticism, because muh "misogyny" and muh "hates peach". I mean, truly amazing.
Femoid privilege exists. Anyone who tells you otherwise is either a liar or completely delusional.
Actually, "partying" would be an understatement. Sanna Marin was ostensibly recorded in a room where other partygoers were talking about drugs. Oh, and two random femoid celebrities were photographed topless and kissing in her official residence.
View: https://twitter.com/InsiderNewsKe/status/1562136711076974597
Some people in Finland are, of course, upset about this. Perhaps they think that topless photos are beneath the decorum expected of a head of government's official residence. Or maybe, because Finland shares a 1,340-km long border with a violently expansionist Russia, there are better things to do than to party. There are many legitimate reasons for Finns to disapprove of their own Prime Minister's off-work activities.
As if on cue, soycucks and feminazis inside and outside of Finland have reflexively defended Sanna Marin by resorting to their tried-and-tested tactic of accusing anybody who criticizes her of "misogyny". HOW DARE YOU DISAPPROVE OF MUH QWEENZ?
That's absurd. Older male politicians are criticized all the time for their activities outside of work, for activities far more benign than wild partying.
Take golf, for example:
It's not just Donald Trump who gets criticized for off-work activities, like golfing. Apparently, even liberal male politicians get criticized for it, too:
I'm not suggesting, of course, that male politicians should be immune to criticism. Far from it. Here's my point: being a head of state or government isn't a 9-to-5 commitment. If you choose to become a career politician, every single thing you have done or will ever do in your life will be scrutinized, even if it's "off-work". Why should the rules be any different for Sanna Marin?
What's ridiculous here is that soys and feminists think female politicians should be immune to criticism, because muh "misogyny" and muh "hates peach". I mean, truly amazing.
Femoid privilege exists. Anyone who tells you otherwise is either a liar or completely delusional.
Last edited:
