probably why a woman who has had more partners can never settle down and be loyal, they rode too much cock carousel and lost their ability to pairbond
I think part of it is also that mass circumcision has made sex a painful and uncomfortable experience for a lot of women. Those "sex is violence" feminists were probably onto something, they just didn't realize the circumstance they were channeling was an artificial one engineered by the Jews steering their own movement.
Due to the increased friction from the absence of the mobile sheath, sex with a circumcised man relies entirely upon the foid providing natural lubrication to make the experience possible, so it only works well with Chad.
For men with foreskin, sex could still be reasonably pleasant for women who weren't wet because the sheath provides mobility. Also whatever lubrication she DOES provide the foreskin would help seal it inside with the increased girth. Foreskin making sex initially pleasant would help to arouse the foid and cause her to lubricate.
Foreskin is essentially a wetness inertia countermeasure: it gets the ball rolling into a pleasure spiral.
This is increased even further with condoms because whatever minor amount of skin mobility might be left behind on the penis is lost by using a condom. Condoms also prevent the direct chemical cause of pairbonding too.
Sure you can bring your own lube but it's probably going to be cold and uncomfortable for the foid. She knows it's artificial and feels violated by it. The man feels cheated too because he wants it to be naturally slippery by the foid's arousal and the subconscious desire he has for his cock to be inherently low-friction.
- - -
another thing I just thought of is that foreskin essentially leads to more wholesome sex because it makes the base shaft of the cock thicker without making the head thicker. So rather than a tiny point (glans) of largeness moving to the back of the womb, the foid feels entirely filled.
This also leads to the cock feeling entirely stimulated from all sides to a greater degree, normally the widest part (head) would get most of the pressure.
Being circumcised in a way makes natural sex degenerate and resemble anal sex in a way, just in reverse because you're limiting the shaft to a single point of tightness instead of the tunnel.
Anal sex is inferior to vaginal sex because the only tight part is the sphincter and then you're just floating in air unless there happens to be poop at the end of that tunnel and smashing your dick into that is going to fill you with a sense of inherent revulsion.
It should not just be our glans that is the part which feels tight to us and to the foid, it should be the entire thing because our foreskin should make our shaft as wide as our glans.
I am betting there is a strong causatory relationship between celibacy and circumcision because we know there is less bliss to aspire to. We feel incomplete. We know we can't provide the satisfaction we were born with the ability to cause. We know any sex we might have will be unnatural.
Condoms probably cause that too, for intact men. I bet women are more likely to let intact men have unprotected sex with them too.
- - -
Arguments around circumcision seem to center on myths that it prevents STDS: in the 1800s and early 1900s it was syphilis while in the late 1900s and early 2000s it's shifted to HIV. They push this in Africa because niggers won't wear condoms, while admitting that you should wear condoms in the west anyway.
The stupid thing about this is that Tyrone is the one spreading all the STDs by fucking dozens of women (and he probably didn't get circumcised) while all the celibate African men who wouldn't have gotten more than 1 sexual partner in their lifetime (at best) lose the ability to fap.
In the west they try to replace this with "intact dicks gross foids out, you will get more sex if you're cut" bullshit.
It's the most cucked thing I've ever heard of: lose your ability to fap competently and actually make sex WORSE (assuming you ever get it: being cut makes it extremely unlikely) because of propaganda of fake benefits.
Foids who spread this myth are pure fucking evil. They are sadists who get off on the idea of having incel dicks mutilated. They secretly fuck the uncut chads while lamenting how much nicer cut incel dicks work. These foids are far worse than the "I just want a nice guy" or "I think short men are cute" foids who fuck tall jerks, because at least those ones haven't endorsed mass permanent mutilation of our genitalia, permanently crippling our ability to coom or give pleasure to a potential wife.
- - -
Knowing we can never have ideal pleasant sex I think makes sex a bitter experience for men, and why you see so many men become angry abrasive misogynistic lovers who will be more apt to settle for a 'hatefuck' or 'pump and dump'. You either need to embrace that (be a sadist) or deny it (be deluded).
Foids inherently attracted to Chad (he gets a pass on delusions/sadism .. his "low-inhib" mind will actually arouse them) might have looked past him for a wholesome healthy-minded sub-Chad in the past: they would value his non-sadism (empathy) and realistic groundedness as a husband.
This is an increasingly difficult thing now because you can't really have both these traits coexist with a desire for doing sex with your mutilated circumcised cock. There is an element of insanity, wherther denialism or cruelty, inherent to wanting to put your prepuceless penis into a vagina now, which logically puts foids on guard about it and resist the sex.
This leaves the only sexual offers from a male which are NOT resisted the ones from Chad where his DNA value appeals purely to a foid's baser instincts as she looks past instincts to find a caring and intelligent husband to sexually bond with. I believe in this way circumcision has contributed to the breakdown of the traditional monoamorous society. It persists as an illusion cast for cut celibate men to cling to so they don't revolt against the Jew.