BummerDrummerOG
卐 卍࿕࿖࿗࿘ꖦ
-
- Joined
- Oct 12, 2018
- Posts
- 21,421
I was on jewtube today and I saw the "covid19 informations" bracket that now all media companies have that are apart of the global monopoly and I clicked on a video. It was about an interview with Dr fauci (head of corona information) done by the matpat game theory ultra soy guy. I watched it.
View: https://youtu.be/fLIkZRmqgjI
While I was watching I saw some really strange stuff going on and I had this chilling feeling. The way the video was communicating to me was like it was ordering me to do something. Not in the way of wanting some objective truth of a virus but more in a way that you are going to spread this video and that this IS objective truth. Again, because this is on youtube and it has its own bracket that also means that this is what the majority of people on the site see just by sheer numbers. The vast majority of people watch these corona interview videos and have these same feelings. Like a club that I couldn't be invited to, and thinking about it that is a good representation of what I was feeling when I was watching the video.
I will give some examples; In the video, the general aura is one of objective truth. Dr Fauci is the ONLY man to talk to. He is THE MAN. he is THE DOCTOR. the ONLY doctor. He is HEAD of corona information. Not "Dr fauci is a very skilled medical professional that is leading the US corona taskforce" but "he is the ONLY TRUTHTELLER ABOUT CORONA". When the interview actually starts, matpat and his girlfriend or wife or whatever are just nodding.
This picture is something to analyze. Fauci is talking, and the more popular, more idolized person (matpat) is looking up to him like he is a god while the more feminine (the woman idk her name) is looking at you. YOU need to be like the male you (as a normcattle) percieve to idolize. To be like big youtube man, look at Dr fauci like god! Now you might think this is a schizopost but it aligns very well with the already existing words of matpat himself calling Fauci as the only source of covid info. It is serious psychology in play here, do not be fooled.
Going further a question is asked about people who don't think the vaccine is legitimate. The atmosphere becomes more dark, sinister even, however it's only sinister when you can properly analyze the video. The vast majority will miss it.
"Some of our extended family have questions about the vaccine, how do we prove them wrong?". Again with the dr coof expert fauci=god agenda, but also "how do we prove them wrong" is a huge thing. They didn't talk to fauci beforehand (allegedly). So how do you know they're automatically wrong? And why assume they are? why not ask "Some relatives of ours have differing opinions on the vaccines, like A B C and D, are these true?". The tone in the vaccine question is one of 8d psychology. They are portraying the ones who don't automatically fall with the in line opinion on vaccines as automatically wrong. They are wrong subhuman scum that need to be shown the way. Infact, the mood of the interviewers changes to one of godly reverance to one of laughing, because that's how theoretical "anti vaccine" or not even anti vaccine but "anti status quo opinion on the vaccine" opinions are to be regarded, as LAUGHABLE.
"YOUR RELATIVES WACKY OPINIONS ARE LAUGHABLE AND FALSE. THEY ARE SO WRONG THAT IT MAKES ME LAUGH. IT IS THE ONLY TIME I LAUGH THIS INTERVIEW THATS HOW BAD AND WRONG YOUR RELATIVES OPINION IS"
Well, here's where things get even more deviant. If you've been on autopilot or not reading this is where stuff gets interesting. See, fauci says that although it's funny because it's wrong, it's harmful and he implies it gets people killed. NOW not only is it "it's objectively false and laughable" but "it's objectively false and it does real harm to people". do you see how that could easily turn into "these people with these objectively false beliefes need to have consequences done to them" and so forth?
Now here's the real blackpill: Like I said, this is being proposed as objective truth. No bias at all. Objective fact from an unbiased and unrelated youtube channel. The vast majority of people believe this as total objective informational truth. Yet all his claims are not even backed up by non institutional things. I'll give you an example:
When asked about the vaccine, and how pharmaceutical companies could possibly be profiting off the vaccine, Fauci goes on about more "objective proof".
"See...pharmaceutical companies, the vaccine people, and the federal government can't be together because they're seperate entities!"
...Obviously this is false, but the vast vast majority of people genuinely believe this, or they are being subliminally told to believe this by the interview. They really don't believe the corporations could give money to the indepdendent fact checkers? Or that the feds could just extort others? Maybe that some independent fact checkers aren't really independent at all? It's simply impossible and like the point made before; laughable, but soon it will be casus beli to kill.
Now while this is a "water in wet" kind of post to an extent-I mean especially here everyone knows the agenda is pushing propoganda and subliminal psychological messaging-I think there's not enough actual analyzation of it. Sure they are propoganda machines and might have subliminal messages, but have you actually seen that process taking place? This is an indepth exploration of a thing everyone knows but nobody knows in depth.
View: https://youtu.be/fLIkZRmqgjI
While I was watching I saw some really strange stuff going on and I had this chilling feeling. The way the video was communicating to me was like it was ordering me to do something. Not in the way of wanting some objective truth of a virus but more in a way that you are going to spread this video and that this IS objective truth. Again, because this is on youtube and it has its own bracket that also means that this is what the majority of people on the site see just by sheer numbers. The vast majority of people watch these corona interview videos and have these same feelings. Like a club that I couldn't be invited to, and thinking about it that is a good representation of what I was feeling when I was watching the video.
I will give some examples; In the video, the general aura is one of objective truth. Dr Fauci is the ONLY man to talk to. He is THE MAN. he is THE DOCTOR. the ONLY doctor. He is HEAD of corona information. Not "Dr fauci is a very skilled medical professional that is leading the US corona taskforce" but "he is the ONLY TRUTHTELLER ABOUT CORONA". When the interview actually starts, matpat and his girlfriend or wife or whatever are just nodding.
This picture is something to analyze. Fauci is talking, and the more popular, more idolized person (matpat) is looking up to him like he is a god while the more feminine (the woman idk her name) is looking at you. YOU need to be like the male you (as a normcattle) percieve to idolize. To be like big youtube man, look at Dr fauci like god! Now you might think this is a schizopost but it aligns very well with the already existing words of matpat himself calling Fauci as the only source of covid info. It is serious psychology in play here, do not be fooled.
Going further a question is asked about people who don't think the vaccine is legitimate. The atmosphere becomes more dark, sinister even, however it's only sinister when you can properly analyze the video. The vast majority will miss it.
"Some of our extended family have questions about the vaccine, how do we prove them wrong?". Again with the dr coof expert fauci=god agenda, but also "how do we prove them wrong" is a huge thing. They didn't talk to fauci beforehand (allegedly). So how do you know they're automatically wrong? And why assume they are? why not ask "Some relatives of ours have differing opinions on the vaccines, like A B C and D, are these true?". The tone in the vaccine question is one of 8d psychology. They are portraying the ones who don't automatically fall with the in line opinion on vaccines as automatically wrong. They are wrong subhuman scum that need to be shown the way. Infact, the mood of the interviewers changes to one of godly reverance to one of laughing, because that's how theoretical "anti vaccine" or not even anti vaccine but "anti status quo opinion on the vaccine" opinions are to be regarded, as LAUGHABLE.
"YOUR RELATIVES WACKY OPINIONS ARE LAUGHABLE AND FALSE. THEY ARE SO WRONG THAT IT MAKES ME LAUGH. IT IS THE ONLY TIME I LAUGH THIS INTERVIEW THATS HOW BAD AND WRONG YOUR RELATIVES OPINION IS"
Well, here's where things get even more deviant. If you've been on autopilot or not reading this is where stuff gets interesting. See, fauci says that although it's funny because it's wrong, it's harmful and he implies it gets people killed. NOW not only is it "it's objectively false and laughable" but "it's objectively false and it does real harm to people". do you see how that could easily turn into "these people with these objectively false beliefes need to have consequences done to them" and so forth?
Now here's the real blackpill: Like I said, this is being proposed as objective truth. No bias at all. Objective fact from an unbiased and unrelated youtube channel. The vast majority of people believe this as total objective informational truth. Yet all his claims are not even backed up by non institutional things. I'll give you an example:
When asked about the vaccine, and how pharmaceutical companies could possibly be profiting off the vaccine, Fauci goes on about more "objective proof".
"See...pharmaceutical companies, the vaccine people, and the federal government can't be together because they're seperate entities!"
...Obviously this is false, but the vast vast majority of people genuinely believe this, or they are being subliminally told to believe this by the interview. They really don't believe the corporations could give money to the indepdendent fact checkers? Or that the feds could just extort others? Maybe that some independent fact checkers aren't really independent at all? It's simply impossible and like the point made before; laughable, but soon it will be casus beli to kill.
Now while this is a "water in wet" kind of post to an extent-I mean especially here everyone knows the agenda is pushing propoganda and subliminal psychological messaging-I think there's not enough actual analyzation of it. Sure they are propoganda machines and might have subliminal messages, but have you actually seen that process taking place? This is an indepth exploration of a thing everyone knows but nobody knows in depth.
Last edited: