BummerDrummerOG
卐 卍࿕࿖࿗࿘ꖦ
-
- Joined
- Oct 12, 2018
- Posts
- 21,418
I know this is a weird thread but as many of you know Angola recently lifted the ban on lgbtq, and not only that but punished discrimination based on sexual orientation by jail
The thing I’m split on is if this was a return to cultural roots or the result of globalism, and the truth is it’s probably both; let me explain.
the first ever “anti homosexuality” laws in many parts of Africa (especially below the equator) were made by the British colonists. Take this excerpt of homosexuality in South Africa before the British came:
TDLR: boy sex was everywhere in South Africa.
This IS until the British came, at which point they instituted anti homosexuality laws.
WHEN THE SOUTH AFRICANS GOT OUT OF APARTHEID, they REINSTATED homosexual intercourse and gay marriage in 1998. Note that this was the ANC: who were communists but also were incredibly anti white/western (hence kill the boer and all the farmers being killed).
Angola also had similar homosexual experiences pre colonial times, until it having been outlawed by the portugese (whites if you count Mediterranean’s as white).
TDLR: Angola was gay and Portugal made them not gay.
so part of me thinks that yes this is obviously globalist influence on poor Angola, but do any of you also think this might be them returning to their original roots? I mean I think it’s both but if this was a genuine globalist plot from day 1 much like Belarus I’d be very interested to get some extra voices in on this.
also >why inceldom discussion
This thread is inceldom discussion because I think it’s incredibly important to know if influence is being put onto Africa as to accurately predict what happens next. If globalist influence over Angola is real and this was all them this could be a prelude to the acceptance of future Angolan or African migrants by liberals who are afraid they may be “homophobic”. Although also it should be noted that as said before this could also be a result of decolonization and self rule for said colonies, as in maybe the Portuguese should’ve never left. Or like noted before this is simply the natural order and going back. The tribes the current Angolans are from still exist and they’re still those tribes, so it could be for once an entirely internal operation.
The thing I’m split on is if this was a return to cultural roots or the result of globalism, and the truth is it’s probably both; let me explain.
the first ever “anti homosexuality” laws in many parts of Africa (especially below the equator) were made by the British colonists. Take this excerpt of homosexuality in South Africa before the British came:
Homosexuality and same-sex relations have been documented among various modern-day South African groups. In the 18th century, the Khoikhoi people recognised the terms koetsire, which refers to a man who is sexually receptive to another man, and soregus, which refers to same-sex masturbation usually among friends. Anal intercourse and sexual relations between women also occurred, though more rarely. The Bantu peoples, most notably the Zulu,[2]Basotho,[3] Mpondo and Tsonga people, had a tradition of young men (inkotshane in Zulu,[2]boukonchana in Sesotho,[3] tinkonkana in Mpondo, and nkhonsthana in Tsonga, also known as "boy-wives" in English) who typically dressed as women (even wearing fake breasts), performed chores associated with women, such as cooking and fetching water and firewood, and had intercrural sex with their older husbands (numa in Zulu and Sesotho, and nima in Mpondo and Tsonga)
TDLR: boy sex was everywhere in South Africa.
This IS until the British came, at which point they instituted anti homosexuality laws.
So whites basically banned homosexuality in the entire region (note south Africa here includes Zimbabwe and Malawi as well).Under South Africa's ruling National Party from 1948 to 1994, homosexuality was a crime punishable by up to seven years in prison; this law was used to harass and outlaw South African gay community events and political activists.[19] In January 1966, the Forest Town raid on a large party in Forest Town, Gautengled to further restrictions on gay and lesbian South Africans.[20]
WHEN THE SOUTH AFRICANS GOT OUT OF APARTHEID, they REINSTATED homosexual intercourse and gay marriage in 1998. Note that this was the ANC: who were communists but also were incredibly anti white/western (hence kill the boer and all the farmers being killed).
Angola also had similar homosexual experiences pre colonial times, until it having been outlawed by the portugese (whites if you count Mediterranean’s as white).
Portugese:In the 1920s, a German anthropologist named Kurt Falk published his research on African tribes, which included some acceptance of homosexuality and bisexuality.[5] Falk reported that homosexual and cross-dressing practices were commonplace among the Ovimbundupeople. Ovimbundu men who behave, act and dress as women are known as chibadi or chibanda, and historically would marry other men. Similar individuals exist in neighbouring ethnic groups; they are known as kimbandaamong the Ambundu, quimbanda among the Kongo and jimbandaa among the Lovale people. Same-sex sexual acts were regarded as having medical effects in these societies. Indeed, such acts were viewed as a remedy for impotence, to improve soil fertility or as a transfer of knowledge. Sexual practices between men were also part of initiation rituals.[6][7]
With the formation and expansion of Portuguese Angola came the expansion of Christianity into the region and therefore the Christian morality that strongly condemned homosexual acts. It was eventually decriminalized in 1852, but was re-criminalized in 1886 with Articles 70 and 71 of the Penal Code of 1886 that contained a vaguely worded prohibition against public immorality and acts considered "against nature".[8] This would remain the legal status for the rest of Portuguese Angola's existence and was not repealed upon Angolan independence in 1975.
TDLR: Angola was gay and Portugal made them not gay.
so part of me thinks that yes this is obviously globalist influence on poor Angola, but do any of you also think this might be them returning to their original roots? I mean I think it’s both but if this was a genuine globalist plot from day 1 much like Belarus I’d be very interested to get some extra voices in on this.
also >why inceldom discussion
This thread is inceldom discussion because I think it’s incredibly important to know if influence is being put onto Africa as to accurately predict what happens next. If globalist influence over Angola is real and this was all them this could be a prelude to the acceptance of future Angolan or African migrants by liberals who are afraid they may be “homophobic”. Although also it should be noted that as said before this could also be a result of decolonization and self rule for said colonies, as in maybe the Portuguese should’ve never left. Or like noted before this is simply the natural order and going back. The tribes the current Angolans are from still exist and they’re still those tribes, so it could be for once an entirely internal operation.
Last edited: