Serious To all the right wing people out there

[Incel_marxist_carni]

My country (Sweden) has only gotten worse since the right wing facist parties gained control almost a year ago. (New government)

Way more retarded decision making and regulations, way worse treatment of poor people. I'm not a fan at all of the political leadership/decisionmaking before that, I'm just pointing out that it's getting worse.

Enjoy the most retarded cope of all time that right wing people in power are smart or care about citizens. The only thing important to them is money and their self interest.

 

[Asgard]

Democracy is, simply, a mere suggestion. Enjoy existence while you can.

 

[LesscoBlob]

If it were right wing, they would already be kicking out immigrants.

 

[Incel_marxist_carni]

If it were right wing, they would already be kicking out immigrants.

They are planning to.

That's the biggest reason they got voted, cause there are so many people in Sweden who hate immigrants either due to racism or cause of news media manipulation.

 

[Sonic]

right or left , no side will ever care about cels

or common population, for that matter

politics are cucked af
if youre a trucel, you are apollitical by definition

VOTE is COPE

 

[LesscoBlob]

They are planning to.

That's the biggest reason they got voted, cause there are so many people in Sweden who hate immigrants either do to racism or cause of news media manipulation.

Based native Swedes.

 

[Incel_marxist_carni]

right or left , no side will ever care about cels

or common population, for that matter

politics are cucked af
if youre a trucel, you are apollitical by definition

VOTE is COPE

Communist countries have always prioritized citizens way more than any other country.

Communist leaders have been the greatest, smartest, and most humane leaders.

 

[Sonic]

Communist countries have always prioritized citizens way more than any other country.

Communist leaders have been the greatest, smartest, and most humane leaders.

imagine being this cucked for someone who doesnt care about you

 

[OutcompetedByRoomba]

Two core problems:

1) The modern rightwing is further left than the leftists of the past. If you don't look only at the current overton window but the entirety of the political specturm, then there is basically no right wing party anywhere.

2) Right-Wingers are individualists. They are more mentally stable (see mensa-fallacy jfl), less neurotic, less mentally ill and more self-reliant. Which is really bad.

The right barely has any ideologues, they mostly have career politicans who are not in it for the cause and will sell the future to the opposition for some favors in the here and now.

And the rw voter base elects those types as well. It's basically the political side for the people who don't really care too much about politics unless they are directly affected, because they are happy to live their own lifes undisturbed.

Sounds good, but gets rolled in the modern political arena by my type of mentally unstable, overly neurotic, status-addicted, true-believer-in-the-cause kind of ideologues.

 

[Puppeter]

right wing only works fully in dictatorship

 

[Chudpreet]

My country (Sweden) has only gotten worse since the right wing facist parties gained control almost a year ago. (New government)

I have a feeling those “right wing fascists” are far from what you say they are. In fact, I’d be willing to bet they’re to the left of American Republicans

way worse treatment of poor people

good

Enjoy the most retarded cope of all time that right wing people in power are smart or care about citizens. The only thing important to them is money and their self interest

Are they at least doing anything to stop floods of niggers, sandniggers, and curryniggers from coming in? That’s what you should care about

 

[Chudpreet]

there are so many people in Sweden who hate immigrants either due to racism or cause of news media manipulation.

 

[Murder Mario]

If it were right wing, they would already be kicking out immigrants.

 

[Murder Mario]

1) The modern rightwing is further left than the leftists of the past. If you don't look only at the current overton window but the entirety of the political specturm, then there is basically no right wing party anywhere.

Elab on this please.

Also, if you don't mind me asking, are you a USAcel? Or a Europecel?

 

[Chudpreet]

Communist countries have always prioritized citizens way more than any other country.

Communist leaders have been the greatest, smartest, and most humane leaders.

Addy mogs + kys

 

[Friezacel]

imagine being this cucked for someone who doesnt care about you

 

[Sonic]

Two core problems:

1) The modern rightwing is further left than the leftists of the past. If you don't look only at the current overton window but the entirety of the political specturm, then there is basically no right wing party anywhere.

2) Right-Wingers are individualists. They are more mentally stable (see mensa-fallacy jfl), less neurotic, less mentally ill and more self-reliant. Which is really bad.

The right barely has any ideologues, they mostly have career politicans who are not in it for the cause and will sell the future to the opposition for some favors in the here and now.

And the rw voter base elects those types as well. It's basically the political side for the people who don't really care too much about politics unless they are directly affected, because they are happy to live their own lifes undisturbed.

Sounds good, but gets rolled in the modern political arena by my type of mentally unstable, overly neurotic, status-addicted, true-believer-in-the-cause kind of ideologues.

high octane cope

 

[soul contre tous]

1) The modern rightwing is further left than the leftists of the past. If you don't look only at the current overton window but the entirety of the political specturm, then there is basically no right wing party anywhere.

I would argue that the modern "far-right" uses traditionally left-wing tropes more successfully than the "leftists" of today in many ways:

1) It is more collectivist in my opinion. While the modern "left" actively aims to fragmentize people by any means neccessary, the " far-right" aims to unite people of all social classes under a common national and cultural identity.

2) It is more prone to be antiintellectualist and simplistic while the modern "left" is often seen as a bunch of academics that are not willing to step down from their ivory towers.

3) It is more populist and polemic for the most part. This is also tied to my second point.

4) It openly participates in the "(((small elite of parasitic exploitators and speculators))) vs. the productive workers that do all the real work" thrope, which has always been THE central trope of all socialist movements.

5) It is presented as revolutionary, NOT reactionary. The modern "far-right" always claimed to be a revolutionary force of national rebirth.

6) It claims to be openly anti-elitist and anti-cooperatist, while international cooperations actively choose to promote leftist tropes.

 

[based_meme]

@OutcompetedByRoomba explained it best but he’s been talking about fucking men lately so idk

 

[Quoj]

I would argue that the modern "far-right" uses traditionally left-wing tropes more successfully than the "leftists" of today in many ways:

1) It is more collectivist in my opinion. While the modern "left" actively aims to fragmentize people by any means neccessary, the " far-right" aims to unite people of all social classes under a common national and cultural identity.

2) It is more prone to be antiintellectualist and simplistic while the modern "left" is often seen as a bunch of academics that are not willing to step down from their ivory towers.

3) It is more populist and polemic for the most part. This is also tied to my second point.

4) It openly participates in the "(((small elite of parasitic exploitators and speculators))) vs. the productive workers that do all the real work" thrope, which has always been THE central trope of all socialist movements.

5) It is presented as revolutionary, NOT reactionary. The modern "far-right" always claimed to be a revolutionary force of national rebirth.

6) It claims to be openly anti-elitist and anti-cooperatist, while international cooperations actively choose to promote leftist tropes.

Good points, that's why the far-right is becoming more appealing everyday for the common citizen, the left abandoned it's traditional viewpoints and fully embraced wokist shit that doesn't matter for the majority of the population.

 

[Chuddington]

I'll vote for whoever brings in the fewest shitskins

 

[GimmeShockTreatment]

Links
Rechts
Links
Rechts

 

[DonezoTheClown]

They are planning to.

That's the biggest reason they got voted, cause there are so many people in Sweden who hate immigrants either due to racism or cause of news media manipulation.

Yeah it's probably because you have daily shootings now in a country that used to be peaceful as fuck. Who brought the sandniggers in? Exactly the left and if the right don't kick them out then they're just not right enough and probably jewish.

 

[OutcompetedByRoomba]

Elab on this please.

Also, if you don't mind me asking, are you a USAcel? Or a Europecel?

europe. germany to be percise. none of the right-wing parties I know of (that aren't niche to the degree of irrelevance) challenge the core ideological pillar of the left that everything hinges on. if you accept your enemies central religious creed, are they even your enemy?

immigration or lgbt or abortion. the right can only ever push back temporarily on these issues because they have long lost the control over the means of cultural production & the institutions which indoctrinate the next generation in society's value system and decide public oppinion. but more than that, they share the same core believes the left does. everybody is equal. all races are the same. give it a generation and rw's will deny sexual dimorphism as well.

this is a battle of memeplexes, religions are the apex-predators of the idea world and only the left's faith has evolved with the times. you can look around and see billions of believers devoted to rivaling religions in countries across the world but they will go through the same changes the west did, if they ever find themselfs joining the first world. and those that can't because their populations have an average IQ of >80 under optimal conditions simply won't be contenders for the leading positions in the global power rankings.

america is even worse on this. but i have yet to see an european party challenge the blank slate in any meaningful way.

 

[TheIncelPill]

If it were right wing, they would already be kicking out immigrants.

 

[WuhanFriedPuppies]

europe. germany to be percise. none of the right-wing parties I know of (that aren't niche to the degree of irrelevance) challenge the core ideological pillar of the left that everything hinges on. if you accept your enemies central religious creed, are they even your enemy?

immigration or lgbt or abortion. the right can only ever push back temporarily on these issues because they have long lost the control over the means of cultural production & the institutions which indoctrinate the next generation in society's value system and decide public oppinion. but more than that, they share the same core believes the left does. everybody is equal. all races are the same. give it a generation and rw's will deny sexual dimorphism as well.

this is a battle of memeplexes, religions are the apex-predators of the idea world and only the left's faith has evolved with the times. you can look around and see billions of believers devoted to rivaling religions in countries across the world but they will go through the same changes the west did, if they ever find themselfs joining the first world. and those that can't because their populations have an average IQ of >80 under optimal conditions simply won't be contenders for the leading positions in the global power rankings.

america is even worse on this. but i have yet to see an european party challenge the blank slate in any meaningful way.
View attachment 888055

WW3 will sort them out. Xi Jinping ain't playing.

 

[Incel_marxist_carni]

Yeah it's probably because you have daily shootings now in a country that used to be peaceful as fuck.

That's arguable, while more shootings happen the overall crime rate in Sweden is still lower than it was 10-30 years ago. Also ethnicity got nothing to do with who will commit crime, it's all about environmental factors, people who live in poverty are simply way more likely to commit crimes.

Who brought the sandniggers in? Exactly the left and if the right don't kick them out then they're just not right enough and probably jewish.

I think your definition of "the left" has been completely screwed up by social media, news media. Liberals aren't left wing, they are central right. Only people that should be classified as left wing are actual socialists/communists. Which is a minority in Sweden, it's incredibly hard to find actual socialists in Sweden. Socialists have zero power in Sweden.

 

[Uncle Death]

That's arguable, while more shootings happen the overall crime rate in Sweden is still lower than it was 10-30 years ago. Also ethnicity got nothing to do with who will commit crime, it's all about environmental factors, people who live in poverty are simply way more likely to commit crimes.


I think your definition of "the left" has been completely screwed up by social media, news media. Liberals aren't left wing, they are central right. Only people that should be classified as left wing are actual socialists/communists. Which is a minority in Sweden, it's incredibly hard to find actual socialists in Sweden. Socialists have zero power in Sweden.

based harakiricel

 

[DonezoTheClown]

That's arguable, while more shootings happen the overall crime rate in Sweden is still lower than it was 10-30 years ago. Also ethnicity got nothing to do with who will commit crime, it's all about environmental factors, people who live in poverty are simply way more likely to commit crimes.

There's still more poor white people in most countries than poor blacks/browns, why aren't they committing the same amount of violent crime? You found a correlation that poor people commit more crime but what if blacks are just more likely to be poor because they're lower IQ and that's why the stats show that poor people commit more crime, not because they're poor but because they're black?

If you're a white male and you aren't pissed off by your country being invaded by these brownoids who want affirmative action, demand you don't racially profile them despite them committing way more crime, committing that crime, demand you don't disrespect their retarded religion despite them being guests in your country then there's something very wrong with you.

 

[IronsideCel]

no globo homo