Just some time ago an ITcel shared our post which featured about 20 male models in a meme format. Their post was plagued with highly-upvoted comments noting how most of those guys aren't even good-looking, followed by isolating physical flaws of several models and discussing why they actually aren't attractive to women. No wonder average-looking guys dom't have a chance. Foids today are desensitized from their youth by watching gigachads all around them on social networks to the point that the average guy has no sexual appeal anymore. 30 minutes on tinder and she can arrange a coffe with a chad in her vicinity, or a gigachad if she's willing to swipe some more and a few miles further. She can even have sex with them if she wants to. Who would bother with boring average and even chadlite guys when you can have cream of the crop on demand?
All that has gotten me thinking, are we overestimating what foids consider good-looking? Are the standards for chads even higher than we thought them to be? I mean they're discussing literal models like Gandy and Meeks and outright saying they aren't attractive. Does the recent meme of "chads are incels today" hold some truth?
Most of us consider 8/10 to be a chad capable of slaying. But I think that's outdated. You can't truly slay Stacies today if you're under 8.5/9. With the explosion of tinder and tiktok female standards are rising higher than anyone could have predicted.
I think this is where the misunderstanding comes between IT and us. When some ITcel claims (or lies) to have seen an average guy slaying, that guy might as well be a chad by our standards. You have to understand, IT's views on attractiveness are skewed. They don't consider anyone ugly, so how can we deduce what they are thinking of when they say they see average guys slaying? What is average for them? If at the same time no one is ugly to them and models are unappealing, then I guess that they consider the local chad slayer average looking.
So, do we need to fix the PSL and decile scale and adjust it to the cUrReNt YeAr? What do you think?
All that has gotten me thinking, are we overestimating what foids consider good-looking? Are the standards for chads even higher than we thought them to be? I mean they're discussing literal models like Gandy and Meeks and outright saying they aren't attractive. Does the recent meme of "chads are incels today" hold some truth?
Most of us consider 8/10 to be a chad capable of slaying. But I think that's outdated. You can't truly slay Stacies today if you're under 8.5/9. With the explosion of tinder and tiktok female standards are rising higher than anyone could have predicted.
I think this is where the misunderstanding comes between IT and us. When some ITcel claims (or lies) to have seen an average guy slaying, that guy might as well be a chad by our standards. You have to understand, IT's views on attractiveness are skewed. They don't consider anyone ugly, so how can we deduce what they are thinking of when they say they see average guys slaying? What is average for them? If at the same time no one is ugly to them and models are unappealing, then I guess that they consider the local chad slayer average looking.
So, do we need to fix the PSL and decile scale and adjust it to the cUrReNt YeAr? What do you think?
