Cleftcel
genetic determinist
★★
- Joined
- Mar 4, 2018
- Posts
- 3,085
And thinks that its a good thing overall that we are been purged from the gene pool. We would produce ugly ass kids tbh and things will be even worse for sub8 male in the future
I think the only ppl who should breed should be tall, good looking and smartYes, destroy chads, as they are outdated mammoth hunters, valued only because humans and especially femoids have primitive minds
that's a good point, all my grandparents were short subhumans tbh but in their day it was enough to be a decent man with a jobo know that your ancestor left their debt to you. My 5 foot great grand papa had the sex and I suffer for it.
Short, cute and smartI think the only ppl who should breed should be tall, good looking and smart
yeah that's what I meant, miserable ugly people will only produce more miserable ugly people. Its an act of cruelty for an uggo to reproduce tbh. Eugenics is ultimately about minimising suffering.But it would be nice to destroy some bad genes and genetic illness.
that's true I agree completely, but who gives a fuck about those men other than other short and/or ugly menWhat good does looks anyways beside attracting foids. All real contributors to humanity have been short bald men.
Ugliness means derision and hatred from those who are beautiful
Eugenics will never work. I attempted to introduce the karma pill here, but the mod would ban me. The law of genetics are below the divine laws, what means if you need to learn some lesson in this life somethng will happen, does not matter if your parents have good genetics or not. And also we have more bodies than this physical body which rules our life.
Well, I know this is bs for everyone here. But if you as me, you believe in God, you believe in justice. It would too much "easy" to save humanity doing eugenics without people solving their internal conflicts and loving each other.
Matthew 22:39 "Love your neighbor as yourself "
I am. I usually think about how my suffering and failure are neccesary for a bigger good.
Yes, destroy chads, as they are outdated mammoth hunters, valued only because humans and especially femoids have primitive minds
I'm eugenecist as wanting to invest more in genetic engineering and changing my genes or the genes of everyone children so they don't face inceldom by either wiping out hypergamy of woman genes and/or making all males highIQ chadsAnd thinks that its a good thing overall that we are been purged from the gene pool. We would produce ugly ass kids tbh and things will be even worse for sub8 male in the future
And to anyone who defends a patriarchy here.I wish eugenics was implemented among curries a while back. but arrange marriage does the exact opposite of that. We are now crowned the ugliest race
thanks for the link,saved and ill have to read it some timeEugenics and other Evils
Eugenics and other Evils - Wikisource, the free online library
en.wikisource.org
I think there's a threshold of good looks/genetics you must possess to be a mostly happy person, this is where we should aim for every baby bornBut I am in favor of eliminating many strands of DNA. But human discontent will always be on the rise no matter what genetic composition you put humanity in.
happiness is not a universality in a vacuum. You must always have things supporting it. Telling people to be unconditionally happy wouldn't need to be told if that weren't the case.thanks for the link,saved and ill have to read it some time
I think there's a threshold of good looks/genetics you must possess to be a mostly happy person, this is where we should aim for every baby born