SlayerSlayer
COMPLY WITH MY FUCKING pronoun (it)
★★★★★
- Joined
- Jul 10, 2018
- Posts
- 19,433
When it comes to dogs, women tend to be more accepting of all sizes, shapes, and breeds of dogs. Humans, even the most virulent racists, often have a sincere appreciation for diversity-- IN DOGS. Many basic bitches even have a preference for smaller dogs, because small dogs are quieter, less intimidating, lower maintenance, and cuter. Women don't mind getting fucked up dogs. There's a lot of virtue signalling to be had when women go get a rescue, and blast on IG their deformed behaviorally incompetent dog that "just needs a home." The love for a flawed dog is sincere.
There's no difference between a spouse and a dog. A dog is just a creature that is branded to be there for you-- is that not the same as a husband? Yet it comes to female preferences for a spouse they suddenly turn into Gobbels. If we mapped the range of female preferences of dogs to that of humans, it would be like if women MUST ONLY ADOPT get golden retrievers in their prime that are already seeing-eye dog trained, or maybe ONLY ADOPT special-forces trained Belgian Malois that has the capacity to DEFEND YOU. All other dogs will rot in the pound and get eaten by gooks, and women will laugh at those dogs of inferior stock as they get eaten.
Genetically superior breeds would be the only breeds whores would be walking around. Ganders at the dog park would be a lot more boring. Even though, yes, everyone has objectively "better" dogs, there's nothing special or unique about any of your fucking dogs they are all the same.
Also, it's weird now normies hate mutts. Normies intuitively know that mutts are inferior, and have no shame about talking shit about half-breed dogs. Normies want pure-breds as the ultimate status symbol. Yet when it comes to humans mutts are superior, being half-black mogs these days. Pure-races (except huwwwhites) get shitted on.
There's no difference between a spouse and a dog. A dog is just a creature that is branded to be there for you-- is that not the same as a husband? Yet it comes to female preferences for a spouse they suddenly turn into Gobbels. If we mapped the range of female preferences of dogs to that of humans, it would be like if women MUST ONLY ADOPT get golden retrievers in their prime that are already seeing-eye dog trained, or maybe ONLY ADOPT special-forces trained Belgian Malois that has the capacity to DEFEND YOU. All other dogs will rot in the pound and get eaten by gooks, and women will laugh at those dogs of inferior stock as they get eaten.
Genetically superior breeds would be the only breeds whores would be walking around. Ganders at the dog park would be a lot more boring. Even though, yes, everyone has objectively "better" dogs, there's nothing special or unique about any of your fucking dogs they are all the same.
Also, it's weird now normies hate mutts. Normies intuitively know that mutts are inferior, and have no shame about talking shit about half-breed dogs. Normies want pure-breds as the ultimate status symbol. Yet when it comes to humans mutts are superior, being half-black mogs these days. Pure-races (except huwwwhites) get shitted on.
Last edited: