Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Brutal Wikipedia Censored the Blackpill on Digit Ratio

lonelysince2006

lonelysince2006

Spiritually 38
★★★★★
Joined
Jan 10, 2024
Posts
1,487

Some guy couldn't handle it and decided to remove the entirety of the table listed under "Correlation with traits" because it gives "undue weight" to the viewpoint that digit ratio does have an affect on certain physiological and psychological aspects of humans (which they do) and because it gives an "indiscriminate [amount] of information." Also because he says most of the cited studies are unreliable without even mentioning which ones.

The edit in question:


I also remember not so long ago that the entire topic of digit ratio was classed as "pseudoscience." Normies really do not like genetic determinism.

@GeckoBus

Edit: Wrong link for the second one
 
Last edited:

Some guy couldn't handle it and decided to remove the entirety of the table listed under "Correlation with traits" because it gives "undue weight" to the viewpoint that digit ratio does have an affect on certain physiological and psychological aspects of humans (which they do) and because it gives an "indiscriminate [amount] of information." Also because he says most of the cited studies are unreliable without even mentioning which ones.

The edit in question:


I also remember not so long ago that the entire topic of digit ratio was classed as "pseudoscience." Normies really do not like genetic determinism.

@GeckoBus
27 years old
 

Some guy couldn't handle it and decided to remove the entirety of the table listed under "Correlation with traits" because it gives "undue weight" to the viewpoint that digit ratio does have an affect on certain physiological and psychological aspects of humans (which they do) and because it gives an "indiscriminate [amount] of information." Also because he says most of the cited studies are unreliable without even mentioning which ones.

The edit in question:


I also remember not so long ago that the entire topic of digit ratio was classed as "pseudoscience." Normies really do not like genetic determinism.

@GeckoBus
Just lol
 
Citations 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 apparently show how digit ratio isn't a reliable indicator for many of the stuff we in the incelosphere are concerned about.
 

Similar threads

EgyptianNiggerKANG
Replies
7
Views
273
uglyugly
uglyugly
lonelysince2006
Replies
39
Views
2K
Julaybib
Julaybib
AsakuraHao
Replies
14
Views
1K
Lonelyus
Lonelyus

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top