Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

JFL Wikipedia thinks, that misandry doesn't exist

AsakuraHao

AsakuraHao

Banned
-
Joined
May 16, 2021
Posts
5,931
Sociologist Allan G. Johnson argues in The Gender Knot: Unraveling our Patriarchal Legacy that accusations of man-hating have been used to put down feminists and to shift attention onto men, reinforcing a male-centered culture.[44] Johnson posits that culture offers no comparable anti-male ideology to misogyny and that "people often confuse men as individuals with men as a dominant and privileged category of people" and that "[given the] reality of women's oppression, male privilege, and men's enforcement of both, it's hardly surprising that every woman should have moments where she resents or even hates men".

Marc A. Ouellette argues in International Encyclopedia of Men and Masculinities that "misandry lacks the systemic, transhistoric, institutionalized, and legislated antipathy of misogyny"; in his view, assuming a parallel between misogyny and misandry overly simplifies relations of gender and power.[4]

Anthropologist David D. Gilmore also argues that misogyny is a "near-universal phenomenon" and that there is no male equivalent to misogyny,[3] further defending manifestations of perceived misandry as not "hatred of men's traditional male role" and a "culture of machismo". He argues that misandry is "different from the intensely ad feminam aspect of misogyny that targets women no matter what they believe or do".[3]

Michael Kimmel states of misogyny and misandry that "claiming some sort of equivalent parallel is, of course, utterly tendentious."[17]

:feelskek::feelskek::feelskek::feelskek::feelskek::feelskek::feelskek::feelswhat::feelswhat::feelswhat::feelswhat::feelswhat::feelswhat::feelswhat::feelspuke::feelspuke::feelspuke::feelspuke::feelspuke::feelspuke::feelspuke::feelsrope::feelsrope::feelsrope::feelsrope::feelsrope::feelsrope::feelsrope:
 
It does exist and it's far more common than Misogyny
 
Yes, I guess girls being almost twice more likely to be adopted has anything to do with misandry :feelsclown:

''Its word: Girls make up about 64 percent of all children adopted by Americans outside the United States. That's a mere 56 * boys for every hundred girls.''
 
Cuckepedia is just cuckit 2.0
 
Leftists think of everything as power relations, mimicking Marx's idea of the bourgeoise x proletarians.

So they see the world like this:

bourgeoise x proletarians
white x black
men x women
straight people x homos

And in their minds, any attack the second group makes towards the first group is not unjust violence but rather just retaliation. Yes, it's retarded, and yes, it makes them bug when several categories overlap (gay white x straight black for instance).
 
Michael Kimmel states of misogyny and misandry that "claiming some sort of equivalent parallel is, of course, utterly tendentious."
Jfk at kikepedia
Kikmmel
 
''Its word: Girls make up about 64 percent of all children adopted by Americans outside the United States. That's a mere 56 * boys for every hundred girls.''
You want to try that high level mathematics operation again?
 
Just become a misanthrope bro

i-am-free-of-all-prejudice-i-hate-everyone-equally-quote-1.jpg
 
Some retards with meme degrees said "nuh uh" so it doesnt exist stupid inkler :soy:
 
So accusing your opponent of thinking bad thoughts and feeling bad emotions about a certain group of people is not an argument and is just used to deflect? How will rightthinkers argue now that it’s wrongthink to call people names like it’s an argument?
 
Whatever doesnt fit into their agenda doesnt exist.
 

Similar threads

Balding Subhuman
Replies
15
Views
506
Buried Alive 2.0
Buried Alive 2.0
AsiaCel
Replies
3
Views
441
Namtriz912
Namtriz912
Shaktiman
Replies
18
Views
889
Antorian
Antorian
Lv99_BixNood
Replies
17
Views
494
zerozerozero
zerozerozero

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top