Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Serious [Serious] can rapists or sexual offenders be allowed here even if they were incel before?

Pajeetsingh

Pajeetsingh

Rodgerist.
-
Joined
Jun 25, 2022
Posts
4,146
Food for thought. Users telling eachother that'll rape a foid or telling others to do so is a very common sight here, that made me wonder,If a user here actually up raping or sexually assaulting a foid , do they belong here? Afterall they had sex without "paying" even if it wasn't consensual?
@wereq @DarkStarDown @Blackpill Monk @LeFrenchCel
What do you think?
 
Of course they should be allowed
 
I think the "without paying" refers to being genuinely desired, so someone who can just rape to get his needs met would still be an incel.

But nevertheless I am not sure they should be allowed here.
 
Is this supposed to be IT bait? :feelshaha:

But yes. Rapemaxxing is not ascension. The entire point of ascension is that the woman wants to fuck you because she likes you.

That's why escortcels are allowed here, that's not real ascension. Escorts have to fuck you because you pay them.

Edit: the 'yes' wasn't an answer to the question, it was 'yes' to the fact rapemaxxing is not ascension.

I actually don't know. Having actual criminals here would put even a bigger spotlight on the forum, and that's obviously not ideal, as @WorthlessSlavicShit said.
 
Last edited:
1715601081818
 
If they're here in this forum or lurking and reading this,
I salute you, thank you.
1715601109694
 
Welcome them with open arms
 
They should be granted mod powers upon registration
 
Yes they are doing my dream job
 
They haven't ascended and are still incels, though I don't know whether it's a good idea for this site to harbor actual criminals:feelskek:.

I think the "without paying" refers to being genuinely desired, so someone who can just rape to get his needs met would still be an incel.

But nevertheless I am not sure they should be allowed here.
Is this supposed to be IT bait? :feelshaha:

But yes. Rapemaxxing is not ascension. The entire point of ascension is that the woman wants to fuck you because she likes you.

That's why escortcels are allowed here, that's not real ascension. Escorts have to fuck you because you pay them.
 
Inceldom entails not being desired by a woman, not not having sex.
A man who fucks a prostitute is still an incel if no woman desires him enough to have sex with him for free. Same goes for a rapist.
 
More important question is what happens to users that get raped by foids.
 
More important question is what happens to users that get raped by foids.
Unless it's pegging or they are forced to lick their pussies they have ascended as they obviously have been desired by a woman. There might be very, very few exceptions, but I currently cannot think of any. Maybe if the only reason for raping is to spread HIV to harm them, then it might not count.
 
That's a big grey area ngl :feelswhere:
 
Think of it as you went to an escort and u didnt pay because you sneaked out.

So yes
 
is there something you want to say
 
Food for thought. Users telling eachother that'll rape a foid or telling others to do so is a very common sight here, that made me wonder,If a user here actually up raping or sexually assaulting a foid , do they belong here? Afterall they had sex without "paying" even if it wasn't consensual?
@wereq @DarkStarDown @Blackpill Monk @LeFrenchCel
What do you think?
Most of the us incels don't have the guts to do rape as most of the incels are highly inhib
 
But i think it is allowed
 
The entire point of ascension is that the woman wants to fuck you because she likes you.
This is a slippery slope because a lot of married men would belong here then.
 
This is a slippery slope because a lot of married men would belong here then.
Well, the woman at least used to like them for what they were ... unless she's a golddigger, then it's essentially prostitution, you are right
 
rape = based plus the hoe didn't want them so yes
 
Food for thought. Users telling eachother that'll rape a foid or telling others to do so is a very common sight here, that made me wonder,If a user here actually up raping or sexually assaulting a foid , do they belong here? Afterall they had sex without "paying" even if it wasn't consensual?
@wereq @DarkStarDown @Blackpill Monk @LeFrenchCel
What do you think?
They are still incels of course. Sexhaving ones, but still incels just like the escortcels. They have to rape the foids for a reason yk.
 
That is an interesting question.

I suppose they would fall in the same category as escortcels.
 
Is this supposed to be IT bait? :feelshaha:

But yes. Rapemaxxing is not ascension. The entire point of ascension is that the woman wants to fuck you because she likes you.

That's why escortcels are allowed here, that's not real ascension. Escorts have to fuck you because you pay them.

Edit: the 'yes' wasn't an answer to the question, it was 'yes' to the fact rapemaxxing is not ascension.

I actually don't know. Having actual criminals here would put even a bigger spotlight on the forum, and that's obviously not ideal, as @WorthlessSlavicShit said.
They have to consent to it so they willingly fucked.
 
This is a slippery slope because a lot of married men would belong here then.
I get what you mean. Women will never be truly attracted to nice guy betabuxxers in the same way they are genuinely attracted to Chads. Betabuxxers would never be truly desired, no matter how hard they oofy doofy.

However, a marriage is more than a simple relationship. There is a bit more to it.
 
Food for thought. Users telling eachother that'll rape a foid or telling others to do so is a very common sight here, that made me wonder,If a user here actually up raping or sexually assaulting a foid , do they belong here? Afterall they had sex without "paying" even if it wasn't consensual?
@wereq @DarkStarDown @Blackpill Monk @LeFrenchCel
What do you think?
No
 
Food for thought. Users telling eachother that'll rape a foid or telling others to do so is a very common sight here, that made me wonder,If a user here actually up raping or sexually assaulting a foid , do they belong here? Afterall they had sex without "paying" even if it wasn't consensual?
@wereq @DarkStarDown @Blackpill Monk @LeFrenchCel
What do you think?
As long as it’s not romantically based they can be here but advocating open criminal behavior should always result in a banning.

As we must protect the forum’s existence by shielding it from the (in)justice system via the Biden junta attempting to shut us down.

We don’t want to provide them any political/legal capital or precedent to do so which is why we ask and demand users not call for that stupid shit.
 
Food for thought. Users telling eachother that'll rape a foid or telling others to do so is a very common sight here, that made me wonder,If a user here actually up raping or sexually assaulting a foid , do they belong here? Afterall they had sex without "paying" even if it wasn't consensual?
@wereq @DarkStarDown @Blackpill Monk @LeFrenchCel
What do you think?
I mean, it technical meets the criteria since they did attain it without having genuine attraction from the foid: However, many issues exist with this.
though I don't know whether it's a good idea for this site to harbor actual criminals:feelskek:.
This is the first one, especially if they also were to claim they haven't been caught yet: That could open up a whole other can of worms in itself, plus tons of underaged edge lords(which we have too many of already) would use it as another way to sound "cool"
That's a big grey area ngl :feelswhere:
 
No rapists and sex offenders with hands on offense can’t be incels. They are Tyrone’s and chads along with bubbas
 

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top