On a deep subconscious level, we rate the attractiveness of someone on whether or not we would have sex with them. It's that simple.
Attractiveness should not be rated on a scale of 1-10.
It should be rated on a scale of Yes or No.
Would you have sex with this person. Yes or No.
That's all that matters when it comes to attractiveness, and it would provide a much more clear ranking of show someone is viewed by the opposite sex.
It doesnt matter if your a 3. Or a 6. Or a 4. Women are not going to want to have sex with you.
To a modern woman there is no difference between a 2/10 man and a 5/10 man. They are both invisible and unfuckable in her eyes.
This is why swipe left or swipe right is so popular. It weeds people out as fuckable or not. Rating scales are pointless.
This is why women rate 80%+ of men unattractive. They don't have any sexual feelings for the vast majority of men. It's not necessarily that the 4/10 or 5/10 guy is ugly or genuinely unattractive. It has more to do with the fact they don't feel sexual desire when looking at him (when they're forced to acknowledge his existence). However they are instantly wet when they see a Chad.
This is why women see sub 8 men as invisible. You are not a sexual option to them.
Men on the other hand have much higher libido then women, so men are far more likely to have lower standards when choosing someone they would have sex with. Men have sex with sheboons, landwhales, and all manor of other grotesque women because nature forces us to by giving us an unrealistic extreme level of libido
TL;DR
Women either see you as fuckable or not. There's no point in being excited if you gymmaxxed and moved from a 4/10 to a 5/10. Your still invisible and unfuckable. Get to a 8/10 and MAYBE a woman might notice you.
We are cursed by nature with high libido to make us fuck even ugly women. Women do not have this insane level of libido so their viewpoint of men is more realistic.
Attractiveness should not be rated on a scale of 1-10.
It should be rated on a scale of Yes or No.
Would you have sex with this person. Yes or No.
That's all that matters when it comes to attractiveness, and it would provide a much more clear ranking of show someone is viewed by the opposite sex.
It doesnt matter if your a 3. Or a 6. Or a 4. Women are not going to want to have sex with you.
To a modern woman there is no difference between a 2/10 man and a 5/10 man. They are both invisible and unfuckable in her eyes.
This is why swipe left or swipe right is so popular. It weeds people out as fuckable or not. Rating scales are pointless.
This is why women rate 80%+ of men unattractive. They don't have any sexual feelings for the vast majority of men. It's not necessarily that the 4/10 or 5/10 guy is ugly or genuinely unattractive. It has more to do with the fact they don't feel sexual desire when looking at him (when they're forced to acknowledge his existence). However they are instantly wet when they see a Chad.
This is why women see sub 8 men as invisible. You are not a sexual option to them.
Men on the other hand have much higher libido then women, so men are far more likely to have lower standards when choosing someone they would have sex with. Men have sex with sheboons, landwhales, and all manor of other grotesque women because nature forces us to by giving us an unrealistic extreme level of libido
TL;DR
Women either see you as fuckable or not. There's no point in being excited if you gymmaxxed and moved from a 4/10 to a 5/10. Your still invisible and unfuckable. Get to a 8/10 and MAYBE a woman might notice you.
We are cursed by nature with high libido to make us fuck even ugly women. Women do not have this insane level of libido so their viewpoint of men is more realistic.
Last edited:
