The thread:
incels.is
The Study it refers to:
The Articles linked in the thread:
a) Article about the original 2003 study
www.newscientist.com
b) Article about the 2013 rerun of the study
www.latimes.com
Key Points to take away from the paper
This is important because obviously when ever a guys has sex with a woman, the gender ratio is 50/50.
So we would expect equal amounts of partners between men and women. The researchers struggled with this question, since men report more partners and women less.
Women reporting more partners just flips the problem.
Of course we know the answer now.
Also, notice in the quote how they make excuses for the women, since the finding contradicts the image of the pure female:
"This pattern should be interpreted cautiously because the overall interaction between participants sex and testing condition was not significant."
This goes hand in hand with something @WorthlessSlavicShit has pointed out to me in this thread:
incels.is
In this thread I linked research that showed that people in academia have a tendency to excuse findings that reflect negatively on women.
When a finding shines a bad light on women, they suddenly become all critical and say oh we have to be more careful and oh, we have to check the methodology etc.
Its a joke.
The quote I posted above is a great example of this. "Women fuck more than men? Impossiboru!"
I've also shown another example in my psychopathy thread, where they did live brainstate monitoring on women and found that their pleasure centers light up from causing their partners pain. That's what we objectively observe. But then the researchers twist this into "this means women value commitment from men."
No comment.
www.dailymail.co.uk
Finally, in the 2013 re-run of the original 2003 lie-detector study, it was found that:
“Women are reporting significantly more partners than the men.”
"Fisher said the findings should raise flags with researchers who use surveys to study sexuality "
"The average age of the study participants was 18, and the overwhelming majority of them were white."
"It was unclear why, 10 years later, women were now reporting that they had a greater number of partners than men"
No further comment is necessary.
@proudweeb
Should @Gymcelled 's original thread be in must read? You decide.
Women's partner count DOUBLED when they thought they were hooked up to a lie detector
They also lied more than men Article https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn3936-fake-lie-detector-reveals-womens-sex-lies/ Paper https://www.amherst.edu/media/view/239672/original/Alexander+%26+Fisher+%282003%29.pdf
incels.is
The Study it refers to:
The Articles linked in the thread:
a) Article about the original 2003 study
Fake lie-detector reveals women's sex lies
Women are less likely than men to be truthful about their sexual experiences, suggest new work that solves an old puzzle
b) Article about the 2013 rerun of the study
Who lies more about sex, men or women?
Ever have that awkward talk with a romantic partner about your sexual history -- about how old you were when you lost your virginity and how many people you've had sex with?
www.latimes.com
Key Points to take away from the paper
- Women's body count doubled when they thought they could not get away with lying (fake lie detector test)
- Women reported significantly earlier age of first sexual experiences than men
- Women reported more sexual partners than men in the fake lie detector test, quote:
This is important because obviously when ever a guys has sex with a woman, the gender ratio is 50/50.
So we would expect equal amounts of partners between men and women. The researchers struggled with this question, since men report more partners and women less.
Women reporting more partners just flips the problem.
Of course we know the answer now.
Also, notice in the quote how they make excuses for the women, since the finding contradicts the image of the pure female:
"This pattern should be interpreted cautiously because the overall interaction between participants sex and testing condition was not significant."
This goes hand in hand with something @WorthlessSlavicShit has pointed out to me in this thread:
Misandry, Not Misogyny, is Rampant in Society (Study)
Analysis finds that across the board, there is pro-female bias in society. - research findings that report favorably on male traits are viewed as less credible - research that reports unfavorably on women is viewed as less credible - pro-female bias is deliberately misconstrued as being harmful...
incels.is
In this thread I linked research that showed that people in academia have a tendency to excuse findings that reflect negatively on women.
When a finding shines a bad light on women, they suddenly become all critical and say oh we have to be more careful and oh, we have to check the methodology etc.
Its a joke.
The quote I posted above is a great example of this. "Women fuck more than men? Impossiboru!"
I've also shown another example in my psychopathy thread, where they did live brainstate monitoring on women and found that their pleasure centers light up from causing their partners pain. That's what we objectively observe. But then the researchers twist this into "this means women value commitment from men."
No comment.
Women gain happiness from seeing their partner upset - because it 'shows their relationship is strong'
Psychologists believe that women gain happiness from seeing their partners unhappy as being able to spot their other halves' bad moods shows the strength of their relationship.
Finally, in the 2013 re-run of the original 2003 lie-detector study, it was found that:
“Women are reporting significantly more partners than the men.”
"Fisher said the findings should raise flags with researchers who use surveys to study sexuality "
"The average age of the study participants was 18, and the overwhelming majority of them were white."
"It was unclear why, 10 years later, women were now reporting that they had a greater number of partners than men"
No further comment is necessary.
@proudweeb
Should @Gymcelled 's original thread be in must read? You decide.
