Show evidence otherwise don't bark bs, fag!
These are all the major y haplogroups of south asia:
en.m.wikipedia.org
Haplogroup H (Y-DNA) - Wikipedia
en.m.wikipedia.org en.m.wikipedia.org
en.m.wikipedia.org
Haplogroup J-M172 - Wikipedia
en.m.wikipedia.org en.m.wikipedia.org
en.m.wikipedia.org
Haplogroup L-M20 - Wikipedia
en.m.wikipedia.org en.m.wikipedia.org
en.m.wikipedia.org
Haplogroup R1a - Wikipedia
en.m.wikipedia.org en.m.wikipedia.org
Haplogroup R-M124 - Wikipedia
en.m.wikipedia.org en.m.wikipedia.org
en.m.wikipedia.org
Haplogroup F-M89 - Wikipedia
en.m.wikipedia.org en.m.wikipedia.org
Haplogroup O-K18 - Wikipedia
en.m.wikipedia.org en.m.wikipedia.org
Amongst these haplogroups, 4 originate from central and western Asia (eurasia), 2 are considered native, and one has an east Asian origin.
This is the major mtdna haplogroups of south asia:
en.m.wikipedia.org
en.m.wikipedia.org
en.m.wikipedia.org
From among these major mtdna haplogroups, 2 can be considered "
native", and cover almost 100% of the south asian maternal gene pool, while the remaining last mtdna haplogroup is found sparsely and sporadically across the entire subcontinent.
"The
macrohaplogroup M, which is considered as a cluster of the proto-Asian maternal lineages,
[32] represents more than
60% of South Asian MtDNA.
[48]"
"The
macrohaplogroup R (a very large and old subdivision of
macrohaplogroup N) is also widely represented and accounts for the other
40% of South Asian MtDNA."
Haplogroup U which is is a haplogroup that both Europeans and south Asians share is found at its highest concentration among a population at ONLY
10-15% and is found sporadically throughout the subcontinent in many different groups so its not necessarily concentrated in one region of south asia.
When it comes to mtdna for curries:
"Most of the studies based on mtDNA variation have reported genetic unity of South Asian populations across language, caste and tribal groups.
[1][2][3] It is likely that haplogroup M was brought to Asia from East Africa along the southern route by earliest migration wave 78,000 years ago.
[1]
According to
Kivisild et al. (1999), "Minor overlaps with lineages described in other Eurasian populations clearly demonstrate that recent immigrations have had very little impact on the innate structure of the maternal
gene pool of South Asians. Despite the variations found within India, these populations stem from a limited number of founder lineages. These lineages were most likely introduced to South Asia during the Middle Palaeolithic, before the peopling of Europe 48,000 years ago and perhaps the Old World in general."
[1] Basu et al. (2003) also emphasises underlying unity of female lineages in India.
[68]"
Meanwhile when it comes y- dna:
"Conclusions based on Y Chromosome variation have been more varied than those based on mtDNA variation. While
Kivisild et al. (2003) proposes an ancient and shared genetic heritage of male lineages in South Asia, Bamshad et al. (2001) suggests an affinity between South Asian male lineages and modern west Eurasians proportionate to upper-caste rank and places upper-caste populations of southern Indian states closer to East Europeans.
[90]"
But what about Parsi cucks? You guys got raped and kicked out from your own country and your rapists were none other that your own countrymen whom you are worshipping.
What a giga cuck
Are you retarded? Parsis and modern iranians are much closely related to each other than parsis are to curries. Most iranians converted to Islam and the rest became refugees. It took 400 years for iran to become a muslim majority country after Islam first arrived there. I don't even understand the second part of your reply, yes persians were the rapists who I'm praising. That's the entire point of a racewar
Present day India is much stronger than Iran; we can easily invade it whenever we want
Has literally nothing to do with our discussion
