Serious Biggest arguments here against white nationalism/fascism/far right ideologies

BummerDrummer

BummerDrummer

Bummer Drummer#8658 Check out my YT •́ε•̀٥
★★★★★
Joined
Oct 11, 2018
Posts
17,375
Online
180d 10h 29m
On this forum, like any other forum or community, there are progressive agents of judaism present in order to dissuade white incels (and incels in general) from the far right. Weather that be Fascism (Which doesn't have to be race based hint hint ethnics reading), White/Racial nationalism, or any other collection of far right beliefs. In this thread I will be debunking the ones I've seen. "This isn't inceldom dicussion" it is, because similar race/political threads have been made, and this is going to be a launching point into another thread about why all incels should join the bulwark against progressivism and why all incels should have far right leanings. Think of this thread as a launching platform and as a prologue to a bigger thread. With all that said, I advise you even if you disagree with my viewpoints to read the thread because your arguments could be here.


Argument #1: "Your race/your women/your people don't like you"
This argument comes from a place of (I think) literal translation but its false, and its insane how far this argument has gone being false. Collectivist ideologies do not agree with ALL of the collective. Communists in a communist society will disagree with some workers, same with fascism. Nationalists (regular) do not like the progressives in the collective. Just because I want an ethnostate doesn't mean I want everyone from my race in my ethnostate and everyone in my race will agree with my ethnostate. Which is why white nationalism (or any racial nationalism) is literally anti 95% of the white (or of any races) population. It is not suppose to be a blanket on all whites, just the white nationalism whites.

The reason its called white nationalism isn't because white nationalists agree with every white person in existence, but because they want a nation of just whites. If their rules involve the genocide of 99.9% of white people in existence but the .1% all live in the collective and can still be an ethnostate then they are still white nationalist. You can apply this to any racial nationalism btw. Most whites hate me and any far right person yes, but they are not white nationalists or far right, and any far right ideology involves a purging of the "most whites" (progressives).


Argument #2: "Society hates you! Why are you on their side?"
Again, this is an argument taken from a literal translation and is more for regular nationalists but I'll still debunk it and its pretty much for the same reasons argument #1 is false. Just because you are a nationalist doesn't mean you like the current society. You do like the concept of your nation but not the way its heading or has headed. Most nationalists are actually insurrectionary because they understand their nation (heritage and values) are being eroded. being a nationalist simply means you like the concept of your nation and its foundation. French nationalists longing to go back to the politics and social attitudes of the french revolution for example, or American nationalists wanting to go back to a "golden age" like the 50's. I don't think I need to explain why I hate society but I can guarantee you it is the furthest from right wing you can get as of currently.

Argument #3: "You are simping for Aryan women/Women/you're a tradcuck/something about women."
Unlike the last 2 arguments I don't really know where this one came from, my guess is that this was astroturfed to the further right after the whole conservative tradthot lauren southern problem. I should say that most far right (note: NOT regular right i.e conservatives or nationalists) see women as stupid and they want to repeal women's rights (see white sharia). Although there are a few fascistic or far right groups that are cucks for women, they are not all and not even a majority. The "tradthot" problem is not far right but is more align with conservatism and nationalism and regular right wing politics. This is why a majority of right wing organizations are entirely men.

Argument #4: "Well if (facists/whitenationalists/nazis/etc.) cared about you, they would throw foids your way!"
This assumes that they are in power when they are not. It should not be a surprise to you that the Nazi party of America, with 5,000 members, cannot give its members foids to fuck. That's because it's a small 5,000 member group (90-95-99% male) and not the nation. When they do get into power this argument can be used, but it will not need to be used as these ideologies when they get into power will distribute women as per their manifesto points.

Argument #5: Eugenicism. "Well you're subhuman/you support eugenics/nazis are eugenicists etc."
This argument comes from historical revisionism and a grouping of the far right. The nazis were not really eugenic, I mean one look at their cabinet will tell you that. They were against the mentally disabled though, and so am I (Not against, but I do think those who are literally incapable of motor function and who are vegetated/brain dead should be given a peaceful death because they're practically not alive in the first place and its the right thing to do). Even if the nazis were insanely eugenicist and really did want only blonde hair blue eye 6'7 giants and they killed everyone else, that still doesn't take away non nazi far right groups. I mean even fascism in its form doesn't advocate for eugenics, and neither does certain sects of national socialism. It definitely doesn't come near white nationalism either. You are conflating the nazis to mean every single hyper right wing group, something liberals frequently do.

And with that last sentence I will actually leave off on this. All of these arguments are to an extent astroturfed by progressives, especially arguments 1 and 5, and it's kind of weird to see something that I expect to see on buzzfeed or vice be argued about on here. It really does make you think...What else on this forum could have a progressive or liberal origin? You're not ready for that, but I can tell you that there's more progressive and liberal influence here than you like to think.

If you're wondering why "politics is cope" isn't here, I will be making a seperate thread talking about how politics isn't a cope and how we all should be bulwarks against progressivism.

Any other arguments I am free to answer for and debunk, although knowing the people here many of you will look at the title and type something already covered in the thread. @ting people I've seen using these arguments and other farrightcels to confirm
@Selinity @Diocel @Mogged Loner @Angry_runt @MountainGorilla @ElliotRodgerGod @ElliotRodgerHere
 
foidologist

foidologist

foidologist zindabad
★★★★★
Joined
Aug 27, 2020
Posts
6,821
Online
61d 4h 24m
Cope. Theocracy is the only viable option.
 
BummerDrummer

BummerDrummer

Bummer Drummer#8658 Check out my YT •́ε•̀٥
★★★★★
Joined
Oct 11, 2018
Posts
17,375
Online
180d 10h 29m
Cope. Theocracy is the only viable option.
theocracy/theocratic ideologies are typically (not always) far right so most of these can apply as well. The KKK is in a way theocratic for example. You can’t just be theocratic though, you have to add that onto an existing economic ideology. Theocratic what?
 
dreadtheblackpill

dreadtheblackpill

the supreme youngcel gentleman
★★★★★
Joined
Jul 31, 2020
Posts
3,408
Online
24d 15h 1m
I hate liberals
 
THE TRUE HONKLER

THE TRUE HONKLER

卐 Nothing but hate and disgust for soyciety 卐
-
Joined
Oct 14, 2020
Posts
14,611
Online
31d 13h 50m
you cant be a nationalist if ur race is shit and the biggest goys out their, fuck it, the only way is a techno master race, or better yet utter destruction of being itself, im tired of the torment of social approval and torturous thinking and how everything that is good contradicts another thing that is good, idk we are all slaves to social approval, fuck
 
foidologist

foidologist

foidologist zindabad
★★★★★
Joined
Aug 27, 2020
Posts
6,821
Online
61d 4h 24m
theocracy/theocratic ideologies are typically (not always) far right so most of these can apply as well. The KKK is in a way theocratic for example. You can’t just be theocratic though, you have to add that onto an existing economic ideology. Theocratic what?
Theocratic Distributism
 
H

Hapacelricecel

Recruit
★★★
Joined
Feb 12, 2019
Posts
255
Online
10d 3h 9m
99% of humankind don't deserve to live on this earth, white or not. They contribute nothing to this world except wasting food and energy. The earth is better off without them. The ones that do, will move to Mars sooner or later.
 
foidologist

foidologist

foidologist zindabad
★★★★★
Joined
Aug 27, 2020
Posts
6,821
Online
61d 4h 24m
99% of humankind don't deserve to live on this earth, white or not. They contribute nothing to this world except wasting food and energy. The earth is better off without them. The ones that do, will move to Mars sooner or later.
I FUCKING LOVE SOYENCE!!!! :soy:
 
Detro

Detro

Blackcel
Joined
Mar 19, 2018
Posts
563
Online
5d 15h 30m
Racism is literally a cope for being low status.
Even if you lived in an ethnostate you would still find something to blame. "Jewish infiltrators" is a popular go-to.
 
your personality

your personality

‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎
★★★★★
Joined
Jun 26, 2020
Posts
21,534
Online
82d 7h 40m
99% of humankind don't deserve to live on this earth, white or not. They contribute nothing to this world except wasting food and energy. The earth is better off without them. The ones that do, will move to Mars sooner or later.
Humans don't deserve to mess up space either tbh
 
foidologist

foidologist

foidologist zindabad
★★★★★
Joined
Aug 27, 2020
Posts
6,821
Online
61d 4h 24m
Racism is literally a cope for being low status.
Even if you lived in an ethnostate you would still find something to blame. "Jewish infiltrators" is a popular go-to.
Literally did you even read the thread
 
Capable_Onion

Capable_Onion

Hikikomori/Neet
★★★★★
Joined
Nov 15, 2019
Posts
5,932
Online
215d 9h 4m
 
BummerDrummer

BummerDrummer

Bummer Drummer#8658 Check out my YT •́ε•̀٥
★★★★★
Joined
Oct 11, 2018
Posts
17,375
Online
180d 10h 29m
I didn't. I don't need to. Racism is cope.
monkey moment

Racism is literally a cope for being low status.
Even if you lived in an ethnostate you would still find something to blame. "Jewish infiltrators" is a popular go-to.
No. Thanks for reminding me of a future thread to make (Racism is not lookism)
Statistically, if America was only white we would be safer crime wise, our gdp would increase, our IQ's would increase and we would be one of the safest countries in the world behind a few european countries. Even then, racism is natural and its natural to dislike outsiders.
 
Last edited:
Detro

Detro

Blackcel
Joined
Mar 19, 2018
Posts
563
Online
5d 15h 30m
Statistically, if America was only white we would be safer crime wise, our gdp would increase, our IQ's would increase and we would be one of the safest countries in the world behind a few european countries. Even then, racism is natural and its natural to dislike outsiders.
Don't live around blacks. You don't need an ethnostate to do this.
GDP would decrease. America is a cultural powerhouse, for a multitude of factors, blacks existing is one of them. You want to see what white countries do? Look at europe. How many of them are culturally or economically relevant?
There's nothing a white person with a high IQ can't do now that they could do in an ethnostate. Having a higher IQ on paper doesn't matter if the people responsible for that paper-IQ already exist.
Don't live around blacks. You don't need an ethnostate to do this.

This is why racism is a cope. The problems you complain about are non-issues if you weren't a low value man. Don't like blacks? Move to a rich white area. Side benefit: you don't have to deal with poor people of any race.
Those pesky niggers stealing a job from you because affirmative action? It's your fault for being so low IQ. If you weren't a midwit and had a valuable skill then you wouldn't be replaceable in the first place.
Blacks existing hasn't seemed to stop high value men from making it. Wishing things were different isn't going to help you make it. Hence: racism is cope.
LITERALLY just stop being dumb and poor.
 
RREEEEEEEEE

RREEEEEEEEE

2/10 curry truecel
★★★★★
Joined
Nov 7, 2017
Posts
36,581
Online
52d 22h 45m
What about... -drum roll- white nationalist cucks who end up marrying non-whites?
 
BummerDrummer

BummerDrummer

Bummer Drummer#8658 Check out my YT •́ε•̀٥
★★★★★
Joined
Oct 11, 2018
Posts
17,375
Online
180d 10h 29m
What about... -drum roll- white nationalist cucks who end up marrying non-whites?
Not rlly existing. There's fascists that do that, but fascism doesn't have to be racially based.
 
RREEEEEEEEE

RREEEEEEEEE

2/10 curry truecel
★★★★★
Joined
Nov 7, 2017
Posts
36,581
Online
52d 22h 45m
Not rlly existing. There's fascists that do that, but fascism doesn't have to be racially based.
But I wonder how can you be a white nationalist but also marry/procreate with non-whites? Seems like these subhumans turn to other races of women because their own aren't giving them any time of day.
 
your personality

your personality

‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎
★★★★★
Joined
Jun 26, 2020
Posts
21,534
Online
82d 7h 40m
What about... -drum roll- white nationalist cucks who end up marrying non-whites?
You are going to get a reply about how no "true" white nationalist does that despite there being lots of examples of just that. The No True Scotsman Fallacy and moving the goalposts will ensue.
 
BummerDrummer

BummerDrummer

Bummer Drummer#8658 Check out my YT •́ε•̀٥
★★★★★
Joined
Oct 11, 2018
Posts
17,375
Online
180d 10h 29m
But I wonder how can you be a white nationalist but also marry/procreate with non-whites? Seems like these subhumans turn to other races of women because their own aren't giving them any time of day.
They don't exist really. I mean I would fuck outside my race but I would not LTR or make children. If you can give some examples that would be good, but there's not many to pick from if at all. Most of these "white nationalists that marry asians" are more akin to fascists or far right but not racially right people.
 
RREEEEEEEEE

RREEEEEEEEE

2/10 curry truecel
★★★★★
Joined
Nov 7, 2017
Posts
36,581
Online
52d 22h 45m
You are going to get a reply about how no "true" white nationalist does that despite there being lots of examples of just that. The No True Scotsman Fallacy and moving the goalposts will ensue.
I always had the feeling it was just a cope for subhuman whites to do. I have never seen a chadlite white nationalist to be honest.
They don't exist really. I mean I would fuck outside my race but I would not LTR or make children.
You're not really a white nationalist then if you would come anywhere near a non-white. I'd be more compassionate about your beliefs if it weren't for the hypocrisy factor. You'd just end up becoming like the guys that I described (white guys that are too subhuman for their own, so they cope with slaying non-whites since that's the best they can get). So yeah, in short I'd think it'd be more respectable to do if you stuck to your own and didn't come near non-whites (since you hate non-whites). Otherwise it's just a big meme, and let's be honest, at this point that's exactly what white nationalism is considering the bulk of its followers are the way I just described.
 
your personality

your personality

‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎
★★★★★
Joined
Jun 26, 2020
Posts
21,534
Online
82d 7h 40m
I always had the feeling it was just a cope for subhuman whites to do. I have never seen a chadlite white nationalist to be honest.
It's just mating guarding oriented around race and securing exclusive mating rights with not only foids of their race but foids of other male's races. Conveniently they say it doesn't matter if they have sex with an ethnic foid as long as they don't have babies. But an ethnic male having casual sex with a white foid but not intending to make babies is still verbotten.
 
RREEEEEEEEE

RREEEEEEEEE

2/10 curry truecel
★★★★★
Joined
Nov 7, 2017
Posts
36,581
Online
52d 22h 45m
It's just mating guarding oriented around race and securing exclusive mating rights with not only foids of their race but foids of other male's races. Conveniently they say it doesn't matter if they have sex with an ethnic foid as long as they don't have babies. But an ethnic male having casual sex with a white foid but not intending to make babies is still verbotten.
That's why it's just simply stupid; the hypocrisy is astounding. Look, I'm a non-white and I don't have anything against them because they don't like my kind, I just don't like them because they are hypocrites. Hypocrites are the lowest of the low.
 
BummerDrummer

BummerDrummer

Bummer Drummer#8658 Check out my YT •́ε•̀٥
★★★★★
Joined
Oct 11, 2018
Posts
17,375
Online
180d 10h 29m
I always had the feeling it was just a cope for subhuman whites to do. I have never seen a chadlite white nationalist to be honest.
There's a few but insurrectionary politics are mostly incel, because the society hates incels. Antifa is all incels mostly too.
You're not really a white nationalist then if you would come anywhere near a non-white. I'd be more compassionate about your beliefs if it weren't for the hypocrisy factor. You'd just end up becoming like the guys that I described (white guys that are too subhuman for their own, so they cope with slaying non-whites since that's the best they can get). So yeah, in short I'd think it'd be more respectable to do if you stuck to your own and didn't come near non-whites (since you hate non-whites). Otherwise it's just a big meme, and let's be honest, at this point that's exactly what white nationalism is considering the bulk of its followers are the way I just described.
No. If we were in an ethnostate yes. We are in a society that is currently multiracial, and within the multiracial society there needs to be needs met. In the same sense you can say "well you're truly not a dissident because you pay taxes to the system". Or "You can't say you hate society because you live in one".

Until the ethnostate comes there's no problem with basic needs (sex). Just no children and no LTR. Note though I will not get either as long as current society continues.
 
RREEEEEEEEE

RREEEEEEEEE

2/10 curry truecel
★★★★★
Joined
Nov 7, 2017
Posts
36,581
Online
52d 22h 45m
There's a few but insurrectionary politics are mostly incel, because the society hates incels. Antifa is all incels mostly too.

No. If we were in an ethnostate yes. We are in a society that is currently multiracial, and within the multiracial society there needs to be needs met. In the same sense you can say "well you're truly not a dissident because you pay taxes to the system". Or "You can't say you hate society because you live in one".

Until the ethnostate comes there's no problem with basic needs (sex). Just no children and no LTR.
View attachment 395670
Bud, you know I like you. But this is just mental gymnastics. If you want a white ethnostate, you could start it at a smaller level; i.e. only associating with whites, only shopping at white-owned shops, etc. You don't need to be near a non-white. It's either all or nothing, not in-between, because it takes away the credibility of the movement.
 
foidologist

foidologist

foidologist zindabad
★★★★★
Joined
Aug 27, 2020
Posts
6,821
Online
61d 4h 24m
Submit to the Holy See
 
BummerDrummer

BummerDrummer

Bummer Drummer#8658 Check out my YT •́ε•̀٥
★★★★★
Joined
Oct 11, 2018
Posts
17,375
Online
180d 10h 29m
Bud, you know I like you. But this is just mental gymnastics. If you want a white ethnostate, you could start it at a smaller level; i.e. only associating with whites, only shopping at white-owned shops, etc.
I do that as it is
You don't need to be near a non-white. It's either all or nothing, not in-between, because it takes away the credibility of the movement.
I mean I am that currently. But if a hot asian woman is trying to take off my pants I am not going to resist that. I just won't have children and it will be a one night stand. Again, "You hate society but you live in it, curious" argument.

I guess you're right in the sense that this is incelo-white nationalism, and we understand sex is a human right and there must be concessions until the ethnostate.
 
the3rdwill

the3rdwill

Recruit
★★★★
Joined
Oct 21, 2019
Posts
306
Online
17d 11h 50m
This forum proves that races can't live together in close proximity without fighting each other. The goal that non-white people have is to somehow fix white people so that they can live in white countries and have access to white people.
 
Idlevillagercel

Idlevillagercel

Detached
★★★★
Joined
Nov 4, 2020
Posts
4,380
Online
44d 10h 21m
On this forum, like any other forum or community, there are progressive agents of judaism present in order to dissuade white incels (and incels in general) from the far right. Weather that be Fascism (Which doesn't have to be race based hint hint ethnics reading), White/Racial nationalism, or any other collection of far right beliefs. In this thread I will be debunking the ones I've seen. "This isn't inceldom dicussion" it is, because similar race/political threads have been made, and this is going to be a launching point into another thread about why all incels should join the bulwark against progressivism and why all incels should have far right leanings. Think of this thread as a launching platform and as a prologue to a bigger thread. With all that said, I advise you even if you disagree with my viewpoints to read the thread because your arguments could be here.


Argument #1: "Your race/your women/your people don't like you"
This argument comes from a place of (I think) literal translation but its false, and its insane how far this argument has gone being false. Collectivist ideologies do not agree with ALL of the collective. Communists in a communist society will disagree with some workers, same with fascism. Nationalists (regular) do not like the progressives in the collective. Just because I want an ethnostate doesn't mean I want everyone from my race in my ethnostate and everyone in my race will agree with my ethnostate. Which is why white nationalism (or any racial nationalism) is literally anti 95% of the white (or of any races) population. It is not suppose to be a blanket on all whites, just the white nationalism whites.

The reason its called white nationalism isn't because white nationalists agree with every white person in existence, but because they want a nation of just whites. If their rules involve the genocide of 99.9% of white people in existence but the .1% all live in the collective and can still be an ethnostate then they are still white nationalist. You can apply this to any racial nationalism btw. Most whites hate me and any far right person yes, but they are not white nationalists or far right, and any far right ideology involves a purging of the "most whites" (progressives).


Argument #2: "Society hates you! Why are you on their side?"
Again, this is an argument taken from a literal translation and is more for regular nationalists but I'll still debunk it and its pretty much for the same reasons argument #1 is false. Just because you are a nationalist doesn't mean you like the current society. You do like the concept of your nation but not the way its heading or has headed. Most nationalists are actually insurrectionary because they understand their nation (heritage and values) are being eroded. being a nationalist simply means you like the concept of your nation and its foundation. French nationalists longing to go back to the politics and social attitudes of the french revolution for example, or American nationalists wanting to go back to a "golden age" like the 50's. I don't think I need to explain why I hate society but I can guarantee you it is the furthest from right wing you can get as of currently.

Argument #3: "You are simping for Aryan women/Women/you're a tradcuck/something about women."
Unlike the last 2 arguments I don't really know where this one came from, my guess is that this was astroturfed to the further right after the whole conservative tradthot lauren southern problem. I should say that most far right (note: NOT regular right i.e conservatives or nationalists) see women as stupid and they want to repeal women's rights (see white sharia). Although there are a few fascistic or far right groups that are cucks for women, they are not all and not even a majority. The "tradthot" problem is not far right but is more align with conservatism and nationalism and regular right wing politics. This is why a majority of right wing organizations are entirely men.

Argument #4: "Well if (facists/whitenationalists/nazis/etc.) cared about you, they would throw foids your way!"
This assumes that they are in power when they are not. It should not be a surprise to you that the Nazi party of America, with 5,000 members, cannot give its members foids to fuck. That's because it's a small 5,000 member group (90-95-99% male) and not the nation. When they do get into power this argument can be used, but it will not need to be used as these ideologies when they get into power will distribute women as per their manifesto points.

Argument #5: Eugenicism. "Well you're subhuman/you support eugenics/nazis are eugenicists etc."
This argument comes from historical revisionism and a grouping of the far right. The nazis were not really eugenic, I mean one look at their cabinet will tell you that. They were against the mentally disabled though, and so am I (Not against, but I do think those who are literally incapable of motor function and who are vegetated/brain dead should be given a peaceful death because they're practically not alive in the first place and its the right thing to do). Even if the nazis were insanely eugenicist and really did want only blonde hair blue eye 6'7 giants and they killed everyone else, that still doesn't take away non nazi far right groups. I mean even fascism in its form doesn't advocate for eugenics, and neither does certain sects of national socialism. It definitely doesn't come near white nationalism either. You are conflating the nazis to mean every single hyper right wing group, something liberals frequently do.

And with that last sentence I will actually leave off on this. All of these arguments are to an extent astroturfed by progressives, especially arguments 1 and 5, and it's kind of weird to see something that I expect to see on buzzfeed or vice be argued about on here. It really does make you think...What else on this forum could have a progressive or liberal origin? You're not ready for that, but I can tell you that there's more progressive and liberal influence here than you like to think.

If you're wondering why "politics is cope" isn't here, I will be making a seperate thread talking about how politics isn't a cope and how we all should be bulwarks against progressivism.

Any other arguments I am free to answer for and debunk, although knowing the people here many of you will look at the title and type something already covered in the thread. @ting people I've seen using these arguments and other farrightcels to confirm
@Selinity @Diocel @Mogged Loner @Angry_runt @MountainGorilla @ElliotRodgerGod @ElliotRodgerHere
You ain't gonna do shit
 
unrelentingclownery

unrelentingclownery

Banned
-
Joined
Nov 17, 2020
Posts
423
Online
9d 13h 3m
Racism is literally a cope for being low status.
Even if you lived in an ethnostate you would still find something to blame. "Jewish infiltrators" is a popular go-to.
Racism is a generalization, same as generalizing by gender, religion, or belief. Those beliefs tend to come from experiences . Racism is “cope or lookism” seems very autistic ways to make everything about an incel lense
 
THE TRUE HONKLER

THE TRUE HONKLER

卐 Nothing but hate and disgust for soyciety 卐
-
Joined
Oct 14, 2020
Posts
14,611
Online
31d 13h 50m
BummerDrummer

BummerDrummer

Bummer Drummer#8658 Check out my YT •́ε•̀٥
★★★★★
Joined
Oct 11, 2018
Posts
17,375
Online
180d 10h 29m
This forum proves that races can't live together in close proximity without fighting each other. The goal that non-white people have is to somehow fix white people so that they can live in white countries and have access to white people.
Yes. The third worlders are progressives trying to ruin our society and we’re defending it. Like irl game
 
DonezoTheClown

DonezoTheClown

Officer
★★★★
Joined
Nov 16, 2020
Posts
822
Online
15d 16h 50m
BLM, crime statistics, love for your own culture and upbringing, political differences between whites and minorities, don't like hearing your stupid paki language when I go outside, don't like your women who are ugly and are forbidden by family and religion to fuck me, the natural hate between different races, having shit on tv translated to your language because youre too lazy too assimilate. And probalby 10 things more if I spend time thinking about it longer. Mosques.

Those are mine, nothing of that has to do anything with inceldom, calling racism cope because it won't get me laid is the most braindead fucking thing on the planet, if you don't get it or see the point here you must be braindead.

I didn't. I don't need to. Racism is cope.
Welp that's a one way ticket to ignore-town my friend.
 
Mogged Loner

Mogged Loner

aka Based Milly
★★★★★
Joined
Nov 16, 2019
Posts
4,964
Online
45d 15h 36m
Argument 1&2 are basically the same

But I digress you have valid points I don’t really care about ethnostates the only problem is if you wanted to achieve one you would have to SERIOUSLY lower your standard of living.

The only reason ethnics aside from the Natives are in this country was to fill labor shortages

There’s not a way to fulfill that gap in labor and resources without having to use ethnics

Only country that can come close to doing it is China but they still need western tech and minerals from underdeveloped nations

Anyway you do away with the ethnics you do away with resources that have become staples in daily life which would ruin your standard of living

But if you’re willing to make that sacrifice then why not? :feelsjuice:
 
Diocel

Diocel

A Soup for one, please.
★★★★★
Joined
Dec 5, 2019
Posts
40,981
Online
179d 22h 25m
Too ADHD for this.
 
Pixycel

Pixycel

GLM commissar
★★★★★
Joined
Sep 21, 2020
Posts
1,995
Online
36d 2h 44m
The only reason ethnics aside from the Natives are in this country was to fill labor shortages

There’s not a way to fulfill that gap in labor and resources without having to use ethnics
Have more kids and let people coming fresh out of collage and highschool start taking the jobs instead of some 3rd worlder who can't speak the language.
Even if there are some labor shortages for a few years until they can be filled out whats the worst that's going to happen? Mr Goldberg not getting his maximum about of shekels for the month? A few investors don't make an ungodly profit? The god of the neo cons aka the GDP is down for a few years?
Compare that to what will happen if you replace your workforce with ethics from a hostile culture.
View: https://www.bitchute.com/video/y69aXyhnB3y1/
View: https://www.bitchute.com/video/qYrLZmmqEaAw/
 
Last edited:
BummerDrummer

BummerDrummer

Bummer Drummer#8658 Check out my YT •́ε•̀٥
★★★★★
Joined
Oct 11, 2018
Posts
17,375
Online
180d 10h 29m
Argument 1&2 are basically the same

But I digress you have valid points I don’t really care about ethnostates the only problem is if you wanted to achieve one you would have to SERIOUSLY lower your standard of living.

The only reason ethnics aside from the Natives are in this country was to fill labor shortages

There’s not a way to fulfill that gap in labor and resources without having to use ethnics

Only country that can come close to doing it is China but they still need western tech and minerals from underdeveloped nations

Anyway you do away with the ethnics you do away with resources that have become staples in daily life which would ruin your standard of living

But if you’re willing to make that sacrifice then why not? :feelsjuice:
The opposite. An Ethnostate would improve terms of living and quality of life. Going by statistics alone we would be way way more developed. Jews import them here to be nation ruiners
 
H

Hyperwristcel

Recruit
★★★
Joined
Jun 22, 2020
Posts
272
Online
1d 6h 42m
any far right ideology involves a purging of the "most whites" (progressives).
Right here you fell for a strawman that was created by leftists. No one on the far right wants to purge anyone, except for some psychos. The majority of nationalists are just like your average liberal, harmless, nice people that one would like to have over for dinner.
most far right (note: NOT regular right i.e conservatives or nationalists) see women as stupid and they want to repeal women's rights (see white sharia)
Another strawman. While it is true that the absolute bottom of the far-right (incels, losers, people with anime avatars) hate women, the majority actually realize that women would be happier in a conservative, traditional and nationalist environment and therefore want to dial back time to the good old days where women wouldn't dye their armpit hair or sell feet pics but instead bake a nice cake and play with the kids.

You have correctly debunked argument number 5, Goebbels for example was a 5'5" mediterranean framecel, the national socialists and the German people loved him. Eugenics were a part of national socialism, that did not mean that all of them wanted to create the 6'7" nordic Übermensch. The pro-nordic movements were a fringe group even during national socialism, and some (such as Himmler) considered blonde slavs to be subhumans, so national socialism was no pro-blonde movement to begin with. Hitler was not blonde either (albeit partly nordic), actually the minority of the NSDAP was. The traitor Stauffenberg was closer to the nordic ideal than most national socialists.
 
Last edited:
BummerDrummer

BummerDrummer

Bummer Drummer#8658 Check out my YT •́ε•̀٥
★★★★★
Joined
Oct 11, 2018
Posts
17,375
Online
180d 10h 29m
Right here you fell for a strawman that was created by leftists. No one on the far right wants to purge anyone, except for some psychos. The majority of nationalists are just like your average liberal, harmless, nice people that one would like to have over for dinner.
Cope wtf? Never seen a fascist/national socialist or etc. not promote the extinction of progressivism. Obviously human killings is not preferred but if it’s the only option I haven’t seen many who wouldn’t pursue it had they been in charge.
Another strawman. While it is true that the absolute bottom of the far-right (incels, losers, people with anime avatars) hate women, the majority actually realize that women would be happier in a conservative, traditional and nationalist environment and therefore want to dial back time to the good old days where women wouldn't dye their armpit hair or sell feet pics but instead bake a nice cake and play with the kids.
Again, that’s traditionalism/conservatism. Although women would objectively be better in that scenario, that’s not the reason for doing it. And it does encompass things like stripping rights anyway.
 
H

Hyperwristcel

Recruit
★★★
Joined
Jun 22, 2020
Posts
272
Online
1d 6h 42m
Cope wtf? Never seen a fascist/national socialist or etc. not promote the extinction of progressivism. Obviously human killings is not preferred but if it’s the only option I haven’t seen many who wouldn’t pursue it had they been in charge.

Again, that’s traditionalism/conservatism. Although women would objectively be better in that scenario, that’s not the reason for doing it. And it does encompass things like stripping rights anyway.
What you wrote was that they supported the purging of most Whites, that is simply incorrect and only psychos would advocate for something like that.

Being conservative in this day and age makes you far-right. Far-left is the new standard, hence, wanting women to be stay-at-home-mothers is far-right.
 
H

Hyperwristcel

Recruit
★★★
Joined
Jun 22, 2020
Posts
272
Online
1d 6h 42m
Don't live around blacks. You don't need an ethnostate to do this.
GDP would decrease. America is a cultural powerhouse, for a multitude of factors, blacks existing is one of them. You want to see what white countries do? Look at europe. How many of them are culturally or economically relevant?
There's nothing a white person with a high IQ can't do now that they could do in an ethnostate. Having a higher IQ on paper doesn't matter if the people responsible for that paper-IQ already exist.
Don't live around blacks. You don't need an ethnostate to do this.

This is why racism is a cope. The problems you complain about are non-issues if you weren't a low value man. Don't like blacks? Move to a rich white area. Side benefit: you don't have to deal with poor people of any race.
Those pesky niggers stealing a job from you because affirmative action? It's your fault for being so low IQ. If you weren't a midwit and had a valuable skill then you wouldn't be replaceable in the first place.
Blacks existing hasn't seemed to stop high value men from making it. Wishing things were different isn't going to help you make it. Hence: racism is cope.
LITERALLY just stop being dumb and poor.
This is what leftists in the US would call "victim blaming" if the races were reversed.

Tired of getting shot by the police? Boo-hoo don't be such a low-IQ nigger!

Tired of having a lower income than Whites and Asians? Just work harder you lazy wanker!

Tired of gang violence and drug dealers? Just move to another neighbourhood!

The reality of course is that one has no power over the environment he is born into or the intelligence, height, race etc. that he was born with. Making fun of someone for being unintelligent or short is just like making fun of someone who was born without limbs.
 
Last edited:
BummerDrummer

BummerDrummer

Bummer Drummer#8658 Check out my YT •́ε•̀٥
★★★★★
Joined
Oct 11, 2018
Posts
17,375
Online
180d 10h 29m
What you wrote was that they supported the purging of most Whites,
Yes, progressives. Which are most whites as you yourself say later in this post I'm quoting
that is simply incorrect and only psychos would advocate for something like that.

Being conservative in this day and age makes you far-right. Far-left is the new standard, hence, wanting women to be stay-at-home-mothers is far-right.
jewish astroturfing has made society far left, but there should still be a distinction and there will continue to be one. I am not the same as a neocon.
 
H

Hyperwristcel

Recruit
★★★
Joined
Jun 22, 2020
Posts
272
Online
1d 6h 42m
jewish astroturfing has made society far left, but there should still be a distinction and there will continue to be one. I am not the same as a neocon.
When we speak in terms of right and left, of political leanings, we are usually referring to the status quo. Hence everyone who advocates for borders (nations) is far-right. Every nationalist is far-right, every conservative who wants women to be able to cook is far right as well. The current political climate dictates this.

Only fifty (or even forty, maybe thirty) years ago that would have been radically different, of course.
 
Last edited:
IslaVista2014

IslaVista2014

With the intent to inflict death
★★★
Joined
Jan 29, 2020
Posts
1,282
Online
38d 22h 37m
Cope

All these arguments are legit.

To address your main argument (I read quick admittedly):

You want whites only but .1% of those whites. Thinking you can genocide 100% of ethnics and 99.9% of whites is delusional. And I hate arguments based on if its realistic or not but still. Western Whites have by far the highest percentage of normies than other races and are responsible for normie culture. Even if you personally prefer whites its dumb to exclude ethnic cels as its already near impossible to find irl incels

Full disclosure Im biased cause am not white (dad is jewish)
 
H

Hyperwristcel

Recruit
★★★
Joined
Jun 22, 2020
Posts
272
Online
1d 6h 42m
Cope

All these arguments are legit.

To address your main argument (I read quick admittedly):

You want whites only but .1% of those whites. Thinking you can genocide 100% of ethnics and 99.9% of whites is delusional. And I hate arguments based on if its realistic or not but still. Western Whites have by far the highest percentage of normies than other races and are responsible for normie culture. Even if you personally prefer whites its dumb to exclude ethnic cels as its already near impossible to find irl incels

Full disclosure Im biased cause am not white (dad is jewish)
I'm curious: As I am not from the US I don't know how people over there classify races and ethnicities ... are Jews considered White? What about Turks and Greeks? Purely judging by skin colour, many Turks and even more Jews could pass as "White" (which is not a race, just a very inaccurate classification of humans) and many Greeks and even some Italians would not pass as "White" despite being of European descent ... what is the general opinion in the US?
 
BummerDrummer

BummerDrummer

Bummer Drummer#8658 Check out my YT •́ε•̀٥
★★★★★
Joined
Oct 11, 2018
Posts
17,375
Online
180d 10h 29m
Cope

All these arguments are legit.

To address your main argument (I read quick admittedly):

You want whites only but .1% of those whites. Thinking you can genocide 100% of ethnics and 99.9% of whites is delusional. And I hate arguments based on if its realistic or not but still. Western Whites have by far the highest percentage of normies than other races and are responsible for normie culture. Even if you personally prefer whites its dumb to exclude ethnic cels as its already near impossible to find irl incels
You didnt read ngl. I never said 99.9% of whites should die, I just used it as a crazy hypothetical. it can be the .00001% remnants of a race, but as long as they're all together in an ethnostate it is still or still can be racial nationalism. As for the exclusion of nonwhites its important to note theres no hostility at all. I don't hate black people. I mean I hate the vast majority of them, but I think and as would any minority thinking that they would be better in their own homelands. The black fascists should be organized into a state and the KKK and the black panthers have worked together before