https://twitter.com/araingang?lang=en . Yeah some mulla on twitter. Send me a study
Idc, but it is still accepting of dalits/untouchables.
It's bullshit. All the Vedas, Ramayana, Mahabharats were written by these "dalits". Aren't we worshiping them?
You stupid retard genoplot is website dedicated to genetics it was constructed with their help
Jfl, they have non-curries and top and curries on the bottom essentially.
I’m not anti-Hindu. People will cope with religion how they wish. So in this respect I’m the opposite of you. Hindu nationalists are the ones spreading fake history, cause the British accounts match with other ones more. For example, Hindus claim that the Vedas teach vegetarianism but as you might already know that they actually sacrificed animals while traditions like Buddhists and Jains are the ones that actually forcefully banned this practice (under King Ashoka).
He was not, all he’s doing here is talking about how the castes were perceived. The Buddha said that caste is just a social convention as other groups like the Greeks did not have them. The Buddha literally taught that one is not higher or lower based on their birth (caste) but by their virtue.
Don't argue with him he is a stupid retard he believes in retarded Hindu nationalist revisionist history
Source?
Regardless, if they're closer to Iranians, they would still be considered MENA
OK, well MENAs still mog on average
Embarassing. No wonder you're so stupid
Hinduism is a religion that glories and demands filthniess, degeneracy, rape and overall subhuman behaviorThe Mahabharata, Book 13: Anusasana Parva: Section LXXVIII
The Mahabharata, Book 13: Anusasana Parva: K.M. Ganguli translation, at sacred-texts.comsacred-texts.com
“One should always bathe, using cow-dung at the time. One should sit on dried cowdung. One should never cast one's urine and excreta and other secretions on cowdung. One should never obstruct kine in any way. One should eat, sitting on a cowhide purified by dipping it in water, and then cast one's eyes towards the west,”
Panchagavya - Wikipedia
en.m.wikipedia.org
View attachment 1089114
“Pañca-gavya, the five products received from the cow, namely milk, yogurt, ghee, cow dung and cow urine, are required in all ritualistic ceremonies performed according to the Vedic directions. Cow urine and cow dung are uncontaminated, and since even the urine and dung of a cow are important, we can just imagine how important this animal is for human civilization…”
-Srimad Bhagavatam 8.8.11
In the urine of cows dwells the Ganges, prosperity (dwells) in the dust (rising from their couch), good fortune in cow dung, and virtue in saluting them. Therefore should they be constantly saluted.
Vishnu Smriti 23.61
The Mahabharata, Book 13: Anusasana Parva: Section LXXVIII
The Mahabharata, Book 13: Anusasana Parva: K.M. Ganguli translation, at sacred-texts.comsacred-texts.com
wtf i LDAR for a few hours and come back and my thread is full of deathnics trying to mog each other
who cares boyos. no blonde HBB primo for any of us. they dont care who invented trig. blonde HBB prime women just want 9/10 epicanthal tilt 6' 100k 7" mayo or bbc
who cares boyos. no blonde HBB primo for any of us. they dont care who invented trig. blonde HBB prime women just want 9/10 epicanthal tilt 6' 100k 7" mayo or bbc
The first suicide bombers were non-muslim pajeets lmfaoooooo!!!
Lol what is this supposed to prove?
no, it is and @Copexodius Maximus shows you are a liar lmfao
This isn't true.
95% of the land conquered is still a massive L on your part
Doesn't matter. Sri lanka is not Hindu, so they don't have the subhuman rituals you dumbfucks participate in, that's why sri lanka is better off than India in HDI. Same goes fr Bangladesh and the Maldives
Congratulations. You went from living in a hellhole to a shithole. Such an improvement!
india could be potentially the Utopia he dreams of if they abandoned hinduism. Anyone with a quarter of a functioning brain can see how determintal that shitskin demon religion is
The difference is that cow piss and cow shit stuff is religious obligation/rituals in Hinduism.
The camel urine thing in Islam was only something that was relegated to ONE group that was sick that the prophet Muhammad met. It's not something that is a religious ritual/practice.
And like I said to him, camel urine has actually been shown to have some medical benefits when mixed with other things.
I have argued with multiple pajeets on this forum, and I have noticed they always resort to whataboutism. I guess this is just more pajeet racial behaviour
Same with Hinduism. Not everyone drinks cow urine.
Source for this?
No,but cow poo is very common item they use
"It was proved that camel’s urine has anti-diabetic, anti-cancer, antibacterial, antiviral, and antifungal properties. It also has hepato-protective and cardiovascular effects."
Like I said, prophet Muhammad prescribed camel urine MIXED WITH MILK as medication ONE TIME to a group of people he encountered who was sick. There's nothing holy or sacred about camel urine in islam, unlike in Hinduism where they consider everything about a cow sacred, including its urine, which they drink raw
Latinas hate them too sadly, maybe even more than white girlsFucking white girls hate Indian Guys nigga
Not everyone stop watching bigoted videos whose only purpose is to divide people by cherry picking videos.
There's a clear conflict of interest here. That's why I didn't cited studies for benefits of cow urine cause they were written by Indians.
Here's one if you are interested
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4566776/
Nm, I looked into it and it seems that I was thinking that because of just paternal ancestry being R1A like north west curries while Iranians have J2.
As for whole genetics, it seems there are some curries and Iranian groups are straddling together in the middle and that’s where the Afghans are also found.
This seems to be based on data collected from reddit where they used a more granular analysis of south asian data it seems. Surprised the Indian government hasn’t banned it yet.
Brutal. Although he claims to be a Jain and not a Hindu, but then goes onto defend Hindu nationalism.
YOU WILL NEVER GET A WHITE BLONDE GIGASTACY
Im pretty sure there are other studies if you look into. Im too lazy to do anymore research
Cow urine may have some benefits, I don't deny that. But drinking it point blank or treating it sacred is still insane.
The main issue is the cow poo
So would you say pashtun genes are more sand or curry?
Only a minority does how many times do I have to tell you.
I would say they are more Indian. Cause AASI and they were once Hindu and Buddhist like Pakistanis.
In the real world when two groups are side by side geographically, you will have areas where there is a transition from one to another. They are in a place where they share similar genetics to both sands and curry. But those curries will be pretty Iranic looking to begin with.
But since Pashtun is an Eastern Iranian language rather than an Indo-Aryan one, I think for convenience I would refer to them as sand. This takes into account their cultural identity as well in the case of a tie breaker.
Kys shit skin heil Hitler
Mayonaise chases non-mayo (ricefoids, curryfoids, and blackfoids)
Men want whats genetically different from them
The perfect beautiful succulent face of blondes , with their perfect fat distribution, and tendency to be slutty, is heroin for currycels
We just want what is different from our curryfoids (curryfoids have fugly faces and frumpy fat distribution)
Why are we so discriminated against? Why is the currycel vs blonde stacy matchup so rigged? No other combo has such a handicap.
Currycels will always crave Blonde HBB
I’ll make sure shit skins you never experience white vagina!
I follow actual people in academia not amatures. People like J Sai Deepak, Anand Ranganathan, Meenakshi Jain, Vikram Sampath, Sandeep Sanyal etc. They are well researched rational people who don't claim anything of this sorts.
That vegetarian thing is especially irritating. People who themselves are not vegetarian are claiming this shit. Savarkar if you didn't know was against untouchable and vegetarianism, and wanted to destroy verna and jati all together. Not like castist and racist Gandhi.
Fuck Ashoka for all the genocides of Ajivikas he did and down fall of Maurya Empire.
This is what Buddha said
AN 5:191 Soṇa Sutta | The Dog Discourse
Theravada Buddhist Sutta from the PÄli Canon
"In the past, brahman males mated only with brahman females and not with non-brahman females. At present, brahman males mate with brahman females and with non-brahman females. At present, male dogs mate only with female dogs and not with female non-dogs. This is the first ancient brahmanical tradition that is now observed among dogs but not among brahmans."
He criticized Bhramins for marrying non-Bhramins and said dogs were better than them
Buddha was against inter jati marriages. Read this paper https://www.jstor.org/stable/29757366
Last edited:
It's a wrap for currycels who want a baddie like Mia Melano
The genocides happened before he became a Buddhist. There are claims of Ashoka killing Ajivika or Jains (don’t remember which) because of drawing the Buddha inferior to their leader but this story is anachronistic.
What a disingenuous Hindu. I will take the time to address every single claim he made and debunk it.
And then you’ll just how much these hindu nationalist are some of the biggest liars that have ever existed.
That currycel may think he is are smart, but he can’t outsmart a Jew.
Let’s take a look at his claims.
He mentions various:
1) Madhura Sutta
SuttaCentral
Early Buddhist texts from the Tipitaka (Tripitaka). Suttas (sutras) with the Buddha's teachings on mindfulness, insight, wisdom, and meditation.
Based on this it is a discussion the monk is debunking the claims of Brahmins that they are the highest caste. And says this claim has no basis to it.
2) Kannakatthala Sutta
SuttaCentral
Early Buddhist texts from the Tipitaka (Tripitaka). Suttas (sutras) with the Buddha's teachings on mindfulness, insight, wisdom, and meditation.
This one repeats the same as before, however it says this:
Sir, there are these four classes: aristocrats, brahmins, peasants, and menials. Is there any difference between them?”
“Of the four classes, two are said to be preeminent—the aristocrats and the brahmins. That is, when it comes to bowing down, rising up, greeting with joined palms, and observing proper etiquette.”
The Buddha isn’t saying here that caste is good jfl, he is just saying it exists and that two are considered higher caste. But in the previous passage it already debunked the idea of superiority, so this is talking about them in terms of social classes in society and how they are treated differently.
3) Assalayana Sutta
SuttaCentral
Early Buddhist texts from the Tipitaka (Tripitaka). Suttas (sutras) with the Buddha's teachings on mindfulness, insight, wisdom, and meditation.
This passage is literally a group of Brahmims who are upset the Buddha is teaching to all 4 castes and wants him to accept Brahmin superiority. He then addresses them with this:
“What do you think, Assalāyana? Have you heard that in Greece and Persia and other foreign lands there are only two classes, masters and bonded servants; and that masters may become servants, and servants masters?”
“Yes, I have heard that.”
“Then what is the source of the brahmins’ certainty and forcefulness in this matter that they make this claim?”
He is literally saying the opposite of what the person in the tweets claim. And says caste doesn’t even exist in foreign lands, so how are these things determined at birth and make people inferior or superior?
And the part about “mixing castes” was mocking the Brahmins for claiming their caste is pure by saying they don’t know their own family heritage like a dog or mule can know (based on mixture).
“What do you think, Assalāyana? Suppose a brahmin boy was to sleep with an aristocrat girl, and they had a child. Would that child be called an aristocrat after the mother or a brahmin after the father?”
“They could be called either.”
“What do you think, Assalāyana? Suppose a mare were to mate with a donkey, and she gave birth to a mule. Would that mule be called a horse after the mother or a donkey after the father?”
“It’s a mule, as it is a crossbreed. I see the difference in this case, but not in the previous cases.
4) The Buddha being a kshatriya of the solar dynasty and of the shakya clan. All of this is his family identity. Is he supposed to pretend like caste system doesn’t exist in India jfl? Just like I’m an Ashkenazi Jew of Slavic heitage, does that mean I’m now supporting the Ashkenazi/Sephardic/Mizrahi division system? I don’t support the divisions but it has become a reality of the Jewish community today.
5) The Buddha talking maintaining purity for 7 generations is doing the same as above about mocking Brahmin claim of purity. The Buddha says if that’s the case then how come even he knows more of his ancestors and know their lineage?
6) When they talk about future Buddhas it means it probably comes from later writings. But a future Buddha would be born in a high caste because they would be taken seriously by society. If a future Buddha came in a lower caste then people would ignore him. This is similar to the prophetic tradition in Judaism, where a prophet is born of lineages where the family won’t be outcastes.
This one is actually the closest to being kind of discriminatory, but it’s more a matter of pragmatism.
So based on all of his claims being debunked, can you now see how much these Hindus distort and lie? Don’t trust them, because what they are doing is just another form of bluepilling coping.
What about thisThe genocides happened before he became a Buddhist. There are claims of Ashoka killing Ajivika or Jains (don’t remember which) because of drawing the Buddha inferior to their leader but this story is anachronistic.
What a disingenuous Hindu. I will take the time to address every single claim he made and debunk it.
And then you’ll just how much these hindu nationalist are some of the biggest liars that have ever existed.
That currycel may think he is are smart, but he can’t outsmart a Jew.
Let’s take a look at his claims.
He mentions various:
1) Madhura Sutta
SuttaCentral
Early Buddhist texts from the Tipitaka (Tripitaka). Suttas (sutras) with the Buddha's teachings on mindfulness, insight, wisdom, and meditation.suttacentral.net
Based on this it is a discussion the monk is debunking the claims of Brahmins that they are the highest caste. And says this claim has no basis to it.
2) Kannakatthala Sutta
SuttaCentral
Early Buddhist texts from the Tipitaka (Tripitaka). Suttas (sutras) with the Buddha's teachings on mindfulness, insight, wisdom, and meditation.
This one repeats the same as before, however it says this:
Sir, there are these four classes: aristocrats, brahmins, peasants, and menials. Is there any difference between them?”
“Of the four classes, two are said to be preeminent—the aristocrats and the brahmins. That is, when it comes to bowing down, rising up, greeting with joined palms, and observing proper etiquette.”
The Buddha isn’t saying here that caste is good jfl, he is just saying it exists and that two are considered higher caste. But in the previous passage it already debunked the idea of superiority, so this is talking about them in terms of social classes in society and how they are treated differently.
3) Assalayana Sutta
SuttaCentral
Early Buddhist texts from the Tipitaka (Tripitaka). Suttas (sutras) with the Buddha's teachings on mindfulness, insight, wisdom, and meditation.
This passage is literally a group of Brahmims who are upset the Buddha is teaching to all 4 castes and wants him to accept Brahmin superiority. He then addresses them with this:
“What do you think, Assalāyana? Have you heard that in Greece and Persia and other foreign lands there are only two classes, masters and bonded servants; and that masters may become servants, and servants masters?”
“Yes, I have heard that.”
“Then what is the source of the brahmins’ certainty and forcefulness in this matter that they make this claim?”
He is literally saying the opposite of what the person in the tweets claim. And says caste doesn’t even exist in foreign lands, so how are these things determined at birth and make people inferior or superior?
And the part about “mixing castes” was mocking the Brahmins for claiming their caste is pure by saying they don’t know their own family heritage like a dog or mule can know (based on mixture).
“What do you think, Assalāyana? Suppose a brahmin boy was to sleep with an aristocrat girl, and they had a child. Would that child be called an aristocrat after the mother or a brahmin after the father?”
“They could be called either.”
“What do you think, Assalāyana? Suppose a mare were to mate with a donkey, and she gave birth to a mule. Would that mule be called a horse after the mother or a donkey after the father?”
“It’s a mule, as it is a crossbreed. I see the difference in this case, but not in the previous cases.
4) The Buddha being a kshatriya of the solar dynasty and of the shakya clan. All of this is his family identity. Is he supposed to pretend like caste system doesn’t exist in India jfl? Just like I’m an Ashkenazi Jew of Slavic heitage, does that mean I’m now supporting the Ashkenazi/Sephardic/Mizrahi division system? I don’t support the divisions but it has become a reality of the Jewish community today.
5) The Buddha talking maintaining purity for 7 generations is doing the same as above about mocking Brahmin claim of purity. The Buddha says if that’s the case then how come even he knows more of his ancestors and know their lineage?
6) When they talk about future Buddhas it means it probably comes from later writings. But a future Buddha would be born in a high caste because they would be taken seriously by society. If a future Buddha came in a lower caste then people would ignore him. This is similar to the prophetic tradition in Judaism, where a prophet is born of lineages where the family won’t be outcastes.
This one is actually the closest to being kind of discriminatory, but it’s more a matter of pragmatism.
So based on all of his claims being debunked, can you now see how much these Hindus distort and lie? Don’t trust them, because what they are doing is just another form of bluepilling coping.
This is what Buddha said
AN 5:191 Soṇa Sutta | The Dog Discourse
Theravada Buddhist Sutta from the PÄli Canonwww.dhammatalks.org
"In the past, brahman males mated only with brahman females and not with non-brahman females. At present, brahman males mate with brahman females and with non-brahman females. At present, male dogs mate only with female dogs and not with female non-dogs. This is the first ancient brahmanical tradition that is now observed among dogs but not among brahmans."
He criticized Bhramins for marrying non-Bhramins and said dogs were better than them
Buddha was against inter jati marriages. Read this paper https://www.jstor.org/stable/29757366
If that was in Manusmrithi it's discrimination, it Buddha says it's "pragmatism". Really? Fuck both Buddists and Hindus.
Make Bharat Jain Again
. Even the word Bharat came from Jain Bharata Chakravarti. Jainism brought prosperity to India more than other two anyway
Two answers to this.
1) It is mocking the Brahmins, as the Vedic Brahmins were actually an opponent school of Buddhism. Why would mating with non-brahmins be a way to mock them? Because they claim to be of a pure lineage, as mentioned in another sutta.
2) read the beginning of the page lol. It literally says this is supposed to be funny.
Acknowledging the caste system existing and it having a social hierarchy is obviously going to mean they will be listened to less at the bottom and ignored. In Jainism all 24 tirthankars were kshatriyas. Explain to me why there were no lower caste Tirthankars jfl.If that was in Manusmrithi it's discrimination, it Buddha says it's "pragmatism". Really? Fuck both Buddists and Hindus.
Make Bharat Jain Again
Obviously both future buddhas and many of the past tirthankars were mythological, but still there is still going societal influence of wanting to make your leader as high socially as can be. Even in Buddhist texts there are mentions of the Buddha’s dad working on crops, but this contradicts his dad being a king. This is no different in both traditions.
Ashoka was converted to Buddhism 4 years before Kalinga war massacre. He was a shitty person
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s7c8giY9K8A
Seems he became a sincere Buddhist after this and felt remorse.
Beloved-of-the-Gods, King Priyadarsi (Ashoka) conquered the Kalingas eight years after his coronation. One hundred and fifty thousand were deported, one hundred thousand were killed and many more died (from other causes). After the Kalingas had been conquered, Beloved-of-the-Gods came to feel a strong inclination towards the Dharma, a love for the Dharma and for instruction in Dharma. Now Beloved-of-the-Gods feels deep remorse for having conquered the Kalingas.
— Ashoka, Rock Edict No. 13
Yeah Buddha was claiming that Bhramins were not following their own traditions of marrying only other Bhramins as if it was a bad thing and mocked them.
No. The Mahabharata, Ramayana and Vedas were written by Sudharas. It was not a caste system. Watch this please
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LFlXrjuWDf4
First it was not "lower" or "upper" caste. We had kings who identified as Sudhras like Reddy. Your question is like asking all world leaders were Presidents.
Don't argue his Hindu nationalist brain will always deny it.
Bro, He literally genocided Ajivika and Jains for ego purposes and commies claim he is a peace loving king.
Fuck Ashoka. He caused the downfall of great Mauryan Empire
Deny what? I am a Hindutva wadi not a Hindu wadi. Again I hate Hindus as much as you do, if not more probably.
Dude just shut up this is a incel forum no-one wants to listen to your retarded Hindu nationalist shit. Go post this type of shit on relevant forums.
Hmmm what are your thoughts on RSS and caste system not a hindutva wadi?
He have no expertise in history why would someone listen to him?
Caste is a misleading term. But jatis and vernas must be abolished as they are irreverent today. The RSS and BJP today is full of cucks. But Savarkar was a great person
'cause he provides sources for his claims and also 'cause fuck Ashoka
What about caste reservation? Not a hindutva wadi.
>Supports RSS
>Not a hindutva wadi
Choose one
M
Nah, there is nothing like scaring white women in the streets
We are not monoliths NCPs like Marxist leftists. I can choose second without choosing first.
Reservations only to SC and ST s not to OBC's . OBC reservation is a scam. Even land owing communities are getting reservations
Last edited:
I know. But also don't spout misleading lies out of your mouth on Hinduism. Criticize them for legitimate things like those cow shit and urine videos people always post here.
He mocked them because the Brahmins think it’s a bad thing. Idk what’s so hard to get there.
I watched the video. This is just complete hindu revisionism.
Point 1- “This is just from preindustrial age where you learn from parents”.
Wrong, the Rig Veda literally talks about the different castes coming from different parts of a cosmic man. Brahmins from the head and shudras from feet. The word jati literally means birth while varna means colour (since they were probably race based early on).
Point 2 - Saying “Brahmin of this community” is trying to obfuscate the religious meaning of the term with some meme common slang. Then he goes onto cry about marxists because Brahmins only have access to vedas. But this is also false, as Brahmins were not allowed to be killed for any reason due to their superiority (according to dharmashastras) while shudras were to have molten lead poutred down their throats and ears for even reciting or hearing the vedas accidentally.
Point 3 - “there were hindus who advocated against caste discrimination, it just happens that those voices aren’t found in textbooks”
So he is just speculating and hoping it’s true with no evidence. The only time we see seeing movements is after Islam comes into India and they start seeing low castes turning to Islam. It’s the same in modern times with Buddhism and christianity.
The reason there were “shudra-kshatriyas” (like Chandragupta Maurya) was because whoever is then ruler gets to make the rules. If the Brahmins disagreed and said a shudra can’t rule, they would get their head chopped off jfl.
It’s pretty obvious you are a larping Hindu.
Yeah, I think he’s lying about being a Jain. There was also twitter white nationalists recently on Twitter who got outed as larping hindu currycels jfl.
I already debunked his point, yet he is just repeating them now. Instead of looking at actual scholars, he runs towards hindu nationalist revisionists.
Users who are viewing this thread
