I have stumbled across an insight that will be absolute suicide fuel, especially for stormfrontcels and other incels coping with national/racial pride.
It is well known in curry discourse that Indians are hybrids of chad Aryan conquerors and Dravidians. But what's not looked at as often is that Dravidians themselves are not a singular ethnic group, but a hybrid of Iran Neolithic Farmers (Iran_N) and South Asian Hunter-Gatherers (AASI). What's interesting is that the proto-Dravidian language and other features of Dravidian cultures probably originated in the Indus-Valley Civilization, which was majority Iran_N and minority AASI, in stark contrast to modern Dravidians who are significantly more AASI. What this suggests is that even before the chad Aryans migrated to India, the chad Iran_N were still mogging the AASI, imposed their Dravidian culture on them, and raped their women to create modern Dravidians.
What I noticed was these mogging events happen often in history. Another case is the Iberian conquest of the Americas. Despite the fact that the Mesoamerican civilizations were far more advanced than the Spanish during the time, the chad Spanish conquistadores still conquered the entire continent, imposed their culture on the indigenous Americans, and then produced rape babies with the indigenous women to produce the modern ethnic groups in the South American continent.
Yet this even extends to places that seem genetically homogeneous. The modern English have an Anglo-Saxon identity, language, and culture, yet only about a third of their ancestry comes from the Anglo-Saxons. The Anglo-Saxon chads simply took control of their lands and imposed their culture on the native Britons, creating the English people.
But it goes back even farther. The Germanic people that settled in England did not create their culture by themselves but were derived from the Proto-Indo-European (PIE) chads who imposed Indo-European language and culture on all European ethnic groups. Some of them received more DNA from these PIE chads, like the Nordic peoples (roughly 50% of their ancestry), and hence are more chadlike, but they, majority of them, were still ultimately just the rape babies of chads and traitorous indigenous foids.
BUT IT DOES NOT EVEN END THERE. The Proto-Indo-European people, majority of them, ultimately the rape babies of the chad Ancient North Eurasians (ancestor of Europeans, West Asians, South Asians, Central Asians, and Native Americans) who were THEMSELVES the product of Y-chromosomal Adam, the first chad who mogged all other living human males at the time to create all of modern humans.
How do I know these were all chads? Because in all these cases, the Y-chromosome haplogroup of these people were carried by their chad conquerors and their mtDNA haplogroups were carried by indigenous people. Since the Y-chromosome can only be passed down by males and the mtDNA haplogroup can only be passed down by females, it means that they must have been descendants of male chads and traitorous indigenous foids, with the subhuman incel males of the time dying out.
So do you see what this is suggesting? It shows repeatedly in human history, a group of people exist - a group of chads take control, impose their culture and language on other all people, rape all other foids, and produce babies bearing their culture only for the process to repeat. This means that almost NONE of society cultures or languages average modern humans speak truly belong to sub-5s male (incels). Modern humans on average are just rape babies of chads and their foid concubines bearing a culture that was forced upon unfortunate incels.
Proof:It is well known in curry discourse that Indians are hybrids of chad Aryan conquerors and Dravidians. But what's not looked at as often is that Dravidians themselves are not a singular ethnic group, but a hybrid of Iran Neolithic Farmers (Iran_N) and South Asian Hunter-Gatherers (AASI). What's interesting is that the proto-Dravidian language and other features of Dravidian cultures probably originated in the Indus-Valley Civilization, which was majority Iran_N and minority AASI, in stark contrast to modern Dravidians who are significantly more AASI. What this suggests is that even before the chad Aryans migrated to India, the chad Iran_N were still mogging the AASI, imposed their Dravidian culture on them, and raped their women to create modern Dravidians.
What I noticed was these mogging events happen often in history. Another case is the Iberian conquest of the Americas. Despite the fact that the Mesoamerican civilizations were far more advanced than the Spanish during the time, the chad Spanish conquistadores still conquered the entire continent, imposed their culture on the indigenous Americans, and then produced rape babies with the indigenous women to produce the modern ethnic groups in the South American continent.
Yet this even extends to places that seem genetically homogeneous. The modern English have an Anglo-Saxon identity, language, and culture, yet only about a third of their ancestry comes from the Anglo-Saxons. The Anglo-Saxon chads simply took control of their lands and imposed their culture on the native Britons, creating the English people.
But it goes back even farther. The Germanic people that settled in England did not create their culture by themselves but were derived from the Proto-Indo-European (PIE) chads who imposed Indo-European language and culture on all European ethnic groups. Some of them received more DNA from these PIE chads, like the Nordic peoples (roughly 50% of their ancestry), and hence are more chadlike, but they, majority of them, were still ultimately just the rape babies of chads and traitorous indigenous foids.
BUT IT DOES NOT EVEN END THERE. The Proto-Indo-European people, majority of them, ultimately the rape babies of the chad Ancient North Eurasians (ancestor of Europeans, West Asians, South Asians, Central Asians, and Native Americans) who were THEMSELVES the product of Y-chromosomal Adam, the first chad who mogged all other living human males at the time to create all of modern humans.
How do I know these were all chads? Because in all these cases, the Y-chromosome haplogroup of these people were carried by their chad conquerors and their mtDNA haplogroups were carried by indigenous people. Since the Y-chromosome can only be passed down by males and the mtDNA haplogroup can only be passed down by females, it means that they must have been descendants of male chads and traitorous indigenous foids, with the subhuman incel males of the time dying out.
So do you see what this is suggesting? It shows repeatedly in human history, a group of people exist - a group of chads take control, impose their culture and language on other all people, rape all other foids, and produce babies bearing their culture only for the process to repeat. This means that almost NONE of society cultures or languages average modern humans speak truly belong to sub-5s male (incels). Modern humans on average are just rape babies of chads and their foid concubines bearing a culture that was forced upon unfortunate incels.
(https://psmag.com/environment/17-to-1-reproductive-success)
https://slate.com/human-interest/20...ildren-for-every-17-women-8000-years-ago.html
One Of The Example:
https://slate.com/human-interest/20...ildren-for-every-17-women-8000-years-ago.html
One Of The Example:
Incels are involuntary subhumans with no culture. Incels have no names. Incels have no language. Incels have no clothes or history or source of national pride or anything. These were ALL forced upon to filthy reject (incels) by the chad of a tribe. This is why incels can't relate to pop culture and most of the past culture in form of entertainment. Just a reminder that average Incel (social outcast) were rejected and bullied by their own race.
Last edited:
