Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Discussion Controversial thought: (modern) Women are potentially superior to men and no longer need us

Iamnothere000

Iamnothere000

Veteran
★★★★
Joined
Nov 13, 2019
Posts
1,308
This is a very controversial thought and I was thinking hard before I was writing this because some of you could get a spastic aneurism reading this. This is not a fully formed opinion but instead a somewhat developed thought so please tell me what you think.

I think with modern technology available, women don’t really need men, only a few Chads to breed.

Sure, there are far fewer women who are willing to do the heavy lifting and putting in the work hours needed to run society (therefore we have a just gender pay gap) but theoretically not all this work that men do is necessary to keep the living standards up.

Only a few activities to maintain infrastructure are really necessary in this ocean of bullshit-jobs we find ourselves in today. And those are not even that difficult with the right equipment so even foids could do it.

Add to this automation and men become obsolete.

Women also don’t need men in an emotional way. If Chad (or later, a betabux) is not available they turn into lesbians or adopt dogs.

If men were to disappear, women also would no longer need men to protect them from other men. Most modern problems for women are caused by men (who are ironically sexually rewarded for it, but that’s another topic).

There would still be slow progress since there are (fewer) inventors and entrepreneur among women. However, there would be significantly less crime and such.

Also, women are less violent and more social/communicative then men, making for better social integration of the individual. (Something that men increasingly lack).

Lastly, women are the reproductive bottleneck, therefore they need us far less than we need them.

(a society of women only need a few men to maintain the population, while a society of men would need an almost equal number of women for that)

This means if things continue, men will become obsolete and discarded like a defunct tool: left to rust and decay. Only Chads will have any value.

There are two solutions that I can discern:

1.) Women must be directly or indirectly enslaved by men. Directly through things like Islam or indirectly through an artificial dependence (e.g. in hard times women would be looking for a provider).

2.) Men must (one final time) reinvent themselves and become fully independent from women. Sex-robots, VR-Porn, Artificial wombs, AI-Girlfriends, Libido-Suppression-Drugs, Men-Only-Clubs/Companies/Society’s and LOTS of deprogramming is needed to destroy the mental chain that leads from our collective necks to female hands.
 
The pitiful morons we are, we keep working for society and then look back and don't understand why we're not getting paid for the job we worked so hard for. In modern society you can hardly win.
 
It's inevitable. They'll genetically engineer or selectively abort babies so that most newborns are female and only top-tier men are born. This will fix the incel crisis, but on the flipside, whores will be in charge of not releasing nukes at each other and that can never end well for humanity.

On the bright side, I'll already be dead by the time that happens anyway and regardless of what happens, my life is already over. :feelsaww: I don't need solutions. The only solution for me is for humanity to annihilate itself.
 
The point is that ugly females pass on genes, so there always will be inceps
 
Cope!!!!
Men will always be superior:lul::lul:
 
Its good to discuss things. I wouldn't count what women need or don't need because they don't rule this world. We are far, far away from a society that doesn't need men, world still needs infrastructure and building and development. Women also need men to fight their battles and die in wars, to keep the order, to enable tutorial mode. Etc

If we go by the logic that world doesn't need men to function because foids can also do those things, then this world needs women even less, whatever women does man can do it better, there are already 8 billion of people so giving birth is not top priority. Average woman has 1.5 kids per life I think, same result could be achieved with ten times less women if breeded regularly. Also artificial wombs.
 
Also, women are less violent and more social/communicative then men, making for better social integration of the individual. (Something that men increasingly lack).
:bluepill: Women are the violent and emotionally erratic sex, its just that they lack the physical aptitude to enact their violence. Were the physical strength differences between men and women reversed, you'd see far more female-on-male violence than you see male-on-female violence today because men exercise self-control. This is demonstrable by looking at domestic violence statistics which prove women are the majority initiators
 
No

If men didn’t do agriculture, they would all starve

If men didn’t drive truck, they wouldn’t be able to buy food from the store

If men didnt work as police, no one would be able to enforce the laws protecting them

If men didn’t maintain water and sewage systems, they wouldn’t have water to bathe with or drink, or have functioning toilets

If men didn’t maintain the electrical grid and online networks, no more orbiters in their electronic devices and no more social media validation
 
You spilled a los of :bluepill: but your main point is right, niggers in here don't believe me when I tell themwomen will take over the world because :bluepill: soys enable them
 
Foids are so entitled that if they were tasked with solely trying to run the world, they would just argue and bitch with each other and nothing would get done, have you seen how some of them treat other members of their gender? It is even worse than the normie male dick measuring contest, foids are extremely vindictive to anyone not within their clique.
 
Women are biologically dependent on men.
 
This is a very controversial thought and I was thinking hard before I was writing this because some of you could get a spastic aneurism reading this. This is not a fully formed opinion but instead a somewhat developed thought so please tell me what you think.

I think with modern technology available, women don’t really need men, only a few Chads to breed.

Sure, there are far fewer women who are willing to do the heavy lifting and putting in the work hours needed to run society (therefore we have a just gender pay gap) but theoretically not all this work that men do is necessary to keep the living standards up.

Only a few activities to maintain infrastructure are really necessary in this ocean of bullshit-jobs we find ourselves in today. And those are not even that difficult with the right equipment so even foids could do it.

Add to this automation and men become obsolete.

Women also don’t need men in an emotional way. If Chad (or later, a betabux) is not available they turn into lesbians or adopt dogs.

If men were to disappear, women also would no longer need men to protect them from other men. Most modern problems for women are caused by men (who are ironically sexually rewarded for it, but that’s another topic).

There would still be slow progress since there are (fewer) inventors and entrepreneur among women. However, there would be significantly less crime and such.

Also, women are less violent and more social/communicative then men, making for better social integration of the individual. (Something that men increasingly lack).

Lastly, women are the reproductive bottleneck, therefore they need us far less than we need them.

(a society of women only need a few men to maintain the population, while a society of men would need an almost equal number of women for that)

This means if things continue, men will become obsolete and discarded like a defunct tool: left to rust and decay. Only Chads will have any value.

There are two solutions that I can discern:

1.) Women must be directly or indirectly enslaved by men. Directly through things like Islam or indirectly through an artificial dependence (e.g. in hard times women would be looking for a provider).

2.) Men must (one final time) reinvent themselves and become fully independent from women. Sex-robots, VR-Porn, Artificial wombs, AI-Girlfriends, Libido-Suppression-Drugs, Men-Only-Clubs/Companies/Society’s and LOTS of deprogramming is needed to destroy the mental chain that leads from our collective necks to female hands.
Foids are dumb, childish and irresponsible.

Non-married adult foids only survive because they're being indirectly supported by men.
 
This is probably the first generation in history where globally/universally foids have indeed become the overlords.

There are actually a lot of foids who could physically kick a lot of our asses (although obviously not many of us would like to have to admit that)

Not only is it over… But now if u say even a word to disagree, you could literally get yer ass handed to you by 1 of these 6' + gigas /stacys.

Shit is crazy out here in 2022 bro :feelsLSD:
 
:bluepill: Women are the violent and emotionally erratic sex, its just that they lack the physical aptitude to enact their violence. Were the physical strength differences between men and women reversed, you'd see far more female-on-male violence than you see male-on-female violence today because men exercise self-control. This is demonstrable by looking at domestic violence statistics which prove women are the majority initiators
They may be as cruel and vindictive as men (or even more so) but they are not as violent. They just lack the testosterone. Women dominate the domestic violence stats because they have no self-restraint unlike men. If raised properly (lol) they would be more peaceful on average.

No

If men didn’t do agriculture, they would all starve

If men didn’t drive truck, they wouldn’t be able to buy food from the store

If men didnt work as police, no one would be able to enforce the laws protecting them

If men didn’t maintain water and sewage systems, they wouldn’t have water to bathe with or drink, or have functioning toilets

If men didn’t maintain the electrical grid and online networks, no more orbiters in their electronic devices and no more social media validation
Did you even read a single word? Women can now do all these jobs because men invented useful equipment that can be operated even by weak and stupid women. Life is now so easy (thanks to men) that women don’t really need men anymore.

Women are biologically dependent on men.
How exactly in modern times?
 
Another victim of feminist propaganda
 
WOMEN DON'T NEED 80% OF THE MEN SINCE ONLY TOP 20% ARE ATTRACTIVE TO THEM AND THEY DON'T NEED ANYMORE TO HAVE UGLY ASS HUSBAND SINCE THEIR ARE FINANCIALLY INDPENDENT AND THEY BETTER LIVE SINGLE THAN WITH UGLY GUY
 
The number 1 reason is women don't need sex as much as men do.
 
This is a very controversial thought and I was thinking hard before I was writing this because some of you could get a spastic aneurism reading this. This is not a fully formed opinion but instead a somewhat developed thought so please tell me what you think.

I think with modern technology available, women don’t really need men, only a few Chads to breed.

Sure, there are far fewer women who are willing to do the heavy lifting and putting in the work hours needed to run society (therefore we have a just gender pay gap) but theoretically not all this work that men do is necessary to keep the living standards up.

Only a few activities to maintain infrastructure are really necessary in this ocean of bullshit-jobs we find ourselves in today. And those are not even that difficult with the right equipment so even foids could do it.

Add to this automation and men become obsolete.

Women also don’t need men in an emotional way. If Chad (or later, a betabux) is not available they turn into lesbians or adopt dogs.

If men were to disappear, women also would no longer need men to protect them from other men. Most modern problems for women are caused by men (who are ironically sexually rewarded for it, but that’s another topic).

There would still be slow progress since there are (fewer) inventors and entrepreneur among women. However, there would be significantly less crime and such.

Also, women are less violent and more social/communicative then men, making for better social integration of the individual. (Something that men increasingly lack).

Lastly, women are the reproductive bottleneck, therefore they need us far less than we need them.

(a society of women only need a few men to maintain the population, while a society of men would need an almost equal number of women for that)

This means if things continue, men will become obsolete and discarded like a defunct tool: left to rust and decay. Only Chads will have any value.

There are two solutions that I can discern:

1.) Women must be directly or indirectly enslaved by men. Directly through things like Islam or indirectly through an artificial dependence (e.g. in hard times women would be looking for a provider).

2.) Men must (one final time) reinvent themselves and become fully independent from women. Sex-robots, VR-Porn, Artificial wombs, AI-Girlfriends, Libido-Suppression-Drugs, Men-Only-Clubs/Companies/Society’s and LOTS of deprogramming is needed to destroy the mental chain that leads from our collective necks to female hands.
ive always thought this. It's not controversial at all. We are just jealous and lack the power and control over toilets that our ancestors did.

YOU GIVE THEM AN INCH, they will take a mile.
 
Can't be bothered to read this, but who will build the houses? Who will fix the roads? Who will maintain and develop the infrastructure they love - afterall, think what goes into their 1 moronic selfie - building huge machines and mining the materials, designing and building the chips/ram/processor, laying the undersea cables, launching the satellites for mobile connections, programming the website, communication protocols etc etc etc etc etc etc etc etc etc

You think women could do this? LMAO
 
They need the police to protect them from men raping them.
Yea, but in my scenario, this need would not exist if men were to disappear.

But chads are still needed to put some standards on women, why would a foid get out of bed and spend 2 hours putting on make up if there's no chad, even tho foids hate most men, their hopes and dreams involve chad
In my scenario there would be a few chads left. But that does not mean that foids would maintain standards.

ive always thought this. It's not controversial at all. We are just jealous and lack the power and control over toilets that our ancestors did.

YOU GIVE THEM AN INCH, they will take a mile.
The merciful thing would be to abort all the non-Chads and be done with it. But instead we are left to fester …why are we still here???

Can't be bothered to read this, but who will build the houses? Who will fix the roads? Who will maintain and develop the infrastructure they love - afterall, think what goes into their 1 moronic selfie - building huge machines and mining the materials, designing and building the chips/ram/processor, laying the undersea cables, launching the satellites for mobile connections, programming the website, communication protocols etc etc etc etc etc etc etc etc etc

You think women could do this? LMAO
Maybe you should read. Women can do those things, just less efficient. We must be honest bro, and face the fact that (some, mostly older) women can also be competent at something.
 
Maybe you should read. Women can do those things, just less efficient. We must be honest bro, and face the fact that (some, mostly older) women can also be competent at something.

Serious question - if they had to start from scratch - would you buy a car that said "made and designed by women" - you'd trust it not to kill you?!
 
Serious question - if they had to start from scratch - would you buy a car that said "made and designed by women" - you'd trust it not to kill you?!
Lol, no. You know how those feminist start-ups go down. Either its men doing all the background work or it turns out to be some kind of over-hyped scam.

However, if there was a hypothetical all-women society and they managed to design/build and use a car, I would keep an eye on it and decide later.
 
Lol, no. You know how those feminist start-ups go down. Either its men doing all the background work or it turns out to be some kind of over-hyped scam.

However, if there was a hypothetical all-women society and they managed to design/build and use a car, I would keep an eye on it and decide later.

Don't worry, it wouldn't be suitable for us - it'd be fit with a Personality Detector 3000 - in this new world, you wouldn't need keys - your personality is all you'd need to get (or not) access to the car

They might even make it self-destruct when an 'undesirable' tried to open it...to eliminate our kind, you know
 
Don't worry, it wouldn't be suitable for us - it'd be fit with a Personality Detector 3000 - in this new world, you wouldn't need keys - your personality is all you'd need to get (or not) access to the car

They might even make it self-destruct when an 'undesirable' tried to open it...to eliminate our kind, you know
:feelshaha: The brakes may or may not give consent before each use.
 
:feelshaha: The brakes may or may not give consent before each use.

Lol...it would communicate with the car in front's Personality Detector...if there was a Kween, our car would stop or swerve into a tree...while if there was another incel who had suddenly managed to start the thing, it'd speed up, to double the damage...of course, the deploying or not of airbags would also be dependant on your Personality - posting on inceltears and/or 'feminist' forums would be a require, to be the most upstanding citizen...the car would even haven an automatic tampon dispenser, cuz, u know, that shit's important to feminists...
 
Ai hookers will replace gamergirls and onlyfans "creators"
And lots of men too, unfortunately.

Were in the beginning of technological revolution. And we don't know what's coming.

After Neolithic revolution people stopped being hunters and gatherers, they were farmers. Product per capita increased greatly, but people did not work less. Instead there were newer jobs. Well sort of. People engaged in crafts and building much more.

Then there was industrial revolution. Agriculture was almost automated. Today its only 3% of population that is involved in farming comparing to 80% in medieval age. These 77% of people still have jobs. In the late 19 century they moves to factories. And now you not only have bread, but also drive Ford.

Then these factory jobs were automated. Right now it is possible
To run a factory with only few engineers, who only intervene when something is broken. This trend will continue.

Where do people go from all these factories? Perhaps into service economy. Like not a factory worker, but factory process setup consultant.

In this case yes foids have advantage, because they're peecieved better. But, keep in mind, there's still need for research, women are only good at gender studies.
 
It’s reality
 
Women may not need men in their personal lives but men still keep the society going by doing all the essential jobs. "I'm an independent woman and I don't need no man" is something a foid can only say in a modern developed society. They are definitely not superior to any man
 
I just want a thick milf sex robot :cryfeels:
 
They're only better because men LET them be better. The male thirst for roast beef overpowers our common sense and makes us desperate for pussy, therefore elevating them to levels they don't deserve. This wasn't the case for all of humanity, we let go and relinquished all control over women.
 
It's inevitable. They'll genetically engineer or selectively abort babies so that most newborns are female and only top-tier men are born. This will fix the incel crisis, but on the flipside, whores will be in charge of not releasing nukes at each other and that can never end well for humanity.

On the bright side, I'll already be dead by the time that happens anyway and regardless of what happens, my life is already over. :feelsaww: I don't need solutions. The only solution for me is for humanity to annihilate itself.
Mega :blackpill:
 
They are superior due to the system created, the game is rigged in their favor, there's no real merit. even though, society still trive in the back of men, without men society as we know would collapse, to think the contrary is a sign of retardation
 
The point is that ugly females pass on genes, so there always will be inceps

I disagree with the original post as it believes a lot of Feminist myths, but regarding this comment I'd say that the solution is simple. Simply institute a "boy license" that only attractive couples may have boys and all boys from unattractive couples or where one partner is ugly will be aborted.
 
They are superior due to the system created, the game is rigged in their favor, there's no real merit. even though, society still trive in the back of men, without men society as we know would collapse, to think the contrary is a sign of retardation

Yep, just look at how toilets function is less prosperous societies. Even if you introduce Feminism and female choice there, they are literally in the same boat as in a traditionalist society. Toilets only win when everything is made heavily in their favour, this is why the United Nations only ever invests in education for girls.
 
This is a very controversial thought and I was thinking hard before I was writing this because some of you could get a spastic aneurism reading this. This is not a fully formed opinion but instead a somewhat developed thought so please tell me what you think.

I think with modern technology available, women don’t really need men, only a few Chads to breed.

Sure, there are far fewer women who are willing to do the heavy lifting and putting in the work hours needed to run society (therefore we have a just gender pay gap) but theoretically not all this work that men do is necessary to keep the living standards up.

Only a few activities to maintain infrastructure are really necessary in this ocean of bullshit-jobs we find ourselves in today. And those are not even that difficult with the right equipment so even foids could do it.

Add to this automation and men become obsolete.

Women also don’t need men in an emotional way. If Chad (or later, a betabux) is not available they turn into lesbians or adopt dogs.

If men were to disappear, women also would no longer need men to protect them from other men. Most modern problems for women are caused by men (who are ironically sexually rewarded for it, but that’s another topic).

There would still be slow progress since there are (fewer) inventors and entrepreneur among women. However, there would be significantly less crime and such.

Also, women are less violent and more social/communicative then men, making for better social integration of the individual. (Something that men increasingly lack).

Lastly, women are the reproductive bottleneck, therefore they need us far less than we need them.

(a society of women only need a few men to maintain the population, while a society of men would need an almost equal number of women for that)

This means if things continue, men will become obsolete and discarded like a defunct tool: left to rust and decay. Only Chads will have any value.

There are two solutions that I can discern:

1.) Women must be directly or indirectly enslaved by men. Directly through things like Islam or indirectly through an artificial dependence (e.g. in hard times women would be looking for a provider).

2.) Men must (one final time) reinvent themselves and become fully independent from women. Sex-robots, VR-Porn, Artificial wombs, AI-Girlfriends, Libido-Suppression-Drugs, Men-Only-Clubs/Companies/Society’s and LOTS of deprogramming is needed to destroy the mental chain that leads from our collective necks to female hands.

Women can't be superior by your argument because of the simple fact they are unable and unwilling to maintain, invent and progress IT and superstructure. They cannot and will not stomach the labor necessary for civilization.

After all this empowerment, women still gravitate to useless liberal arts degrees, gender studies degrees or 'professions' that use their sexuality. Even among blue collar work they are almost completely absent. They can't do the high intensity jobs like construction, unloading trucks, sewage, power grids. Things absolutely essential to our existence.

Look at the current situation in Sri Lanka. Why haven't the based females swooped in to save the day?

Your problem is that like foids, you have mistaken the interdependence of modern day civilization for true independence. Women are as pathetic as ever, still totally reliant on men and their labor - they just fail to acknowledge it because women derive support from various sources now as opposed to individual men. So men being the providers is obscured in their solipsistic mind. If its not front and center, they refuse to acknowledge it.
 
Last edited:
No

If men didn’t do agriculture, they would all starve

If men didn’t drive truck, they wouldn’t be able to buy food from the store

If men didnt work as police, no one would be able to enforce the laws protecting them

If men didn’t maintain water and sewage systems, they wouldn’t have water to bathe with or drink, or have functioning toilets

If men didn’t maintain the electrical grid and online networks, no more orbiters in their electronic devices and no more social media validation
this. and this is only the tip of the infrastructure inceberg that men are maintaining almost all by themselves...
 
Women can't be superior by your argument because of the simple fact they are unable and unwilling to maintain, invent and progress IT and superstructure. They cannot and will not stomach the labor necessary for civilization.

After all this empowerment, women still gravitate to useless liberal arts degrees, gender studies degrees or 'professions' that use their sexuality. Even among blue collar work they are almost completely absent. They can't do the high intensity jobs like construction, unloading trucks, sewage, power grids. Things absolutely essential to our existence.

Look at the current situation in Sri Lanka. Why haven't the based females swooped in to save the day?

Your problem is that like foids, you have mistaken the interdependence of modern day civilization for true independence. Women are as pathetic as ever, still totally reliant on men and their labor - they just fail to acknowledge it because women derive support from various sources now as opposed to individual men. So men being the providers is obscured in their solipsistic mind. If its not front and center, they refuse to acknowledge it.

this. and this is only the tip of the infrastructure inceberg that men are maintaining almost all by themselves...

Ok, if it’s really the case that there are not enough women (per capita) in a modern western country who are willing and able to maintain the infrastructure and keep such a society running, then my initial conclusion is wrong.:feelstastyman:

But is still think women should be enslaved or we should become independent from them. :dab:
 
They are superior due to the system created, the game is rigged in their favor, there's no real merit. even though, society still trive in the back of men, without men society as we know would collapse, to think the contrary is a sign of retardation
QFT. Put men's and women's teams on truly equal footing and see what happens. Women have zero ability to survive in nature; they pay no taxes on net; they have lived and will always live by manipulating men.
 
I think they would still need a subhuman slave class of men to make up for the economic strain provided by foid stuff like motherhood.
 
Tesla predicted this ages ago.

 
I believe they really thrive in the environment we created for them as a society. All this corporate bs and social whatever. They definitely don't need men anymore to protect them, and we men have basically nothing to offer anymore except money and dick. We became too powerful for our own good and created a world where we as humans no longer need to fight for survival.l, thus making us men almost obsolete.
 
Women can't be superior by your argument because of the simple fact they are unable and unwilling to maintain, invent and progress IT and superstructure. They cannot and will not stomach the labor necessary for civilization.

After all this empowerment, women still gravitate to useless liberal arts degrees, gender studies degrees or 'professions' that use their sexuality. Even among blue collar work they are almost completely absent. They can't do the high intensity jobs like construction, unloading trucks, sewage, power grids. Things absolutely essential to our existence.

Look at the current situation in Sri Lanka. Why haven't the based females swooped in to save the day?

Your problem is that like foids, you have mistaken the interdependence of modern day civilization for true independence. Women are as pathetic as ever, still totally reliant on men and their labor - they just fail to acknowledge it because women derive support from various sources now as opposed to individual men. So men being the providers is obscured in their solipsistic mind. If its not front and center, they refuse to acknowledge it.
Based
 
This is a very controversial thought and I was thinking hard before I was writing this because some of you could get a spastic aneurism reading this. This is not a fully formed opinion but instead a somewhat developed thought so please tell me what you think.

I think with modern technology available, women don’t really need men, only a few Chads to breed.

Sure, there are far fewer women who are willing to do the heavy lifting and putting in the work hours needed to run society (therefore we have a just gender pay gap) but theoretically not all this work that men do is necessary to keep the living standards up.

Only a few activities to maintain infrastructure are really necessary in this ocean of bullshit-jobs we find ourselves in today. And those are not even that difficult with the right equipment so even foids could do it.

Add to this automation and men become obsolete.

Women also don’t need men in an emotional way. If Chad (or later, a betabux) is not available they turn into lesbians or adopt dogs.

If men were to disappear, women also would no longer need men to protect them from other men. Most modern problems for women are caused by men (who are ironically sexually rewarded for it, but that’s another topic).

There would still be slow progress since there are (fewer) inventors and entrepreneur among women. However, there would be significantly less crime and such.

Also, women are less violent and more social/communicative then men, making for better social integration of the individual. (Something that men increasingly lack).

Lastly, women are the reproductive bottleneck, therefore they need us far less than we need them.

(a society of women only need a few men to maintain the population, while a society of men would need an almost equal number of women for that)

This means if things continue, men will become obsolete and discarded like a defunct tool: left to rust and decay. Only Chads will have any value.

There are two solutions that I can discern:

1.) Women must be directly or indirectly enslaved by men. Directly through things like Islam or indirectly through an artificial dependence (e.g. in hard times women would be looking for a provider).

2.) Men must (one final time) reinvent themselves and become fully independent from women. Sex-robots, VR-Porn, Artificial wombs, AI-Girlfriends, Libido-Suppression-Drugs, Men-Only-Clubs/Companies/Society’s and LOTS of deprogramming is needed to destroy the mental chain that leads from our collective necks to female hands.
lmao nah bro. women didnt evolve to take control they evolved to be takin control of society would collapse
 
This is probably the first generation in history where globally/universally foids have indeed become the overlords.

There are actually a lot of foids who could physically kick a lot of our asses (although obviously not many of us would like to have to admit that)

Not only is it over… But now if u say even a word to disagree, you could literally get yer ass handed to you by 1 of these 6' + gigas /stacys.

Shit is crazy out here in 2022 bro :feelsLSD:
ur using an extreme case of a 6 foot women ofc :feelstastyman::feelstastyman::feelstastyman:. anyway its not us enabling this (unless u still treat women nice) its the normies
 

Similar threads

VictimofBpillReaper
Replies
21
Views
514
VideoGameCoper
VideoGameCoper
CHOoseWisely123
Replies
38
Views
1K
Cock'nBalls
Cock'nBalls
db-bchr-iv
Replies
8
Views
234
db-bchr-iv
db-bchr-iv
Balding Subhuman
Replies
13
Views
785
_meh
_meh

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top