Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

RageFuel diocel the pedo.

  • Thread starter Deleted member 20987
  • Start date
Can't wait for this bad faith moral crusader @psygnosis-owl to be banned ngl.

Mods can't ban unless I've broken any rules.

Are they going to ban people for advertising fastbanana.com which blocks incels.co getting any ad-revenue?
@psygnosis-owl is an SJW cuck confirmed :banhammer:

SJW are also pro pedophillia.

Walk on home boy.
Can't wait for this bad faith moral crusader @psygnosis-owl to be banned ngl.

No faith just basic knowledge of human biology and sex education which you pedocels continue to ignore.

Not a bash on incels, I'm talking pedocels saying they can't get laid with a 7 year old tik tok social influencer that's being promoted around here.
 
Last edited:
Are we really doing this pedo hunt moral fagging shit on incels.co?

We talk about killing women, beating and raping them and all of a sudden wanting to fuck foids under 18 is a problem?
Moral fags belong on a cross.
 
you pedocels
Speak for yourself you insufferable garbage, keep bootlicking for me.

Regardless, the idea that we should self-censor is exactly the sort of attitude which makes other sites bad.
 
Speak for yourself you insufferable garbage, keep bootlicking for me.

Regardless, the idea that we should self-censor is exactly the sort of attitude which makes other sites bad.

Actually @Master is a fan of the website in my banner below.

So not sure why @knajjd gave me a warning for mentioning it in passing.

Chad ************ vs Virgin FastBanana

https://incels.is/threads/fastbanana-v-************.230165

************ was the former url.
 
Actually @Master is a fan of the website in my banner below.
No, you're proselytizing for modern societal standards, that's what makes you a bootlicker.
 
a- not jewish, false rumour starting in a now deleted thread to hide that fact by mods. Only cause it made a poster look dumb
b- Going by your antisemetism jews are often credited by promoting pedophillia not moralising it.

So I guess this forum is full of "Jewish pedophiles" if we go by your logic.
You are mistaken. antisemitism is primarily because Jews are moralfagging SJW cunts.

So every person (like yourself) who goes on a moralfagging rant here is just like those Jewish pigs.
 
Mods can't ban unless I've broken any rules.
not sure why @knajjd gave me a warning for mentioning it in passing.

Guys, when do you think he going to get that him being a whiny moralfag is exactly whats going to get him banned (nobody comes to an incel forum to self censor, that defeats the purpose)

Nobody likes a virtue signaller
 
Never been on looksmaxx but from a prelim browse the place seems pedocontentfree. Though you can never know.

They talk about JB. As do the lookism net forum.
 
No, you're proselytizing for modern societal standards, that's what makes you a bootlicker.

I only align to being incel.

Not a pedocel whether our forum or Nathan's. Not trying to convert anyone.

Although there were multiple incels.co trying to advertise discord which is a rival messaging board. Shall we ban them?

Nope cause @GoffSystemQB is pretending there isn;t a discord exodus being promoted by about 90% of his users.
 
You are mistaken. antisemitism is primarily because Jews are moralfagging SJW cunts.

So every person (like yourself) who goes on a moralfagging rant here is just like those Jewish pigs.

Well that view is illegal and there is a Jewish clause in forum rules for antisemitism.

I'm neither a Jew, nor Zionist nor antisemitic.

It's all a stormfront cope.

No political stance for your face.
They talk about JB. As do the lookism net forum.

Jailbait is an American word as a lot of states the age of consent is 18.

We have it 16 in the UK so the word is Null.

In Brazil where they have produce most teenage bikini models for jailbait gallery the age of consent is 14 and looking at clothed teens is legal.

Nice knowing you.
 
Last edited:
Reported for moralfagging. What users says on here concerns the users itself.
 
Well that view is illegal and there is a Jewish clause in forum rules for antisemitism.

I'm neither a Jew, nor Zionist nor antisemitic.

It's all a stormfront cope.

No political stance for your face.


Jailbait is an American word as a lot of states the age of consent is 18.

We have it 16 in the UK so the word is Null.

In Brazil where they have produce most teenage bikini models for jailbait gallery the age of consent is 14 and looking at clothed teens is legal.

Nice knowing you.


Looking at clothed teens under 18 is illegal in UK if Mr police forensic deems it a "provacactive" or "sexualised pose" or some shit like that.

Non-erotic and non-sexualised pictures showing children in their underwear, swimming costumes from either commercial sources or family albums. Pictures of children playing in normal settings, in which the context or organisation of pictures by the collector indicates inappropriateness.

This can include drawings of fairies or cartoons.

 
Looking at clothed teens under 18 is illegal in UK if Mr police forensic deems it a "provacactive" or "sexualised pose" or some shit like that.

This can include drawings of fairies or cartoons.


Nice, will read.

Tbh I don't really look at under 18 images too much.

I am for freedom of expression ages 13-17 and tbf the mainstream has a lot sexualised teenage imagery like Nickelodeon, fashion catalogues, music videos etc so how Mr Plod polices the copine scale is interesting.

I still think the CP TOR and Poundland wannabe mrz, boojles here on incels.co are larpers though. But not letting them off the hook as even joking about it is sick tbh.

Can you pm if you're on a different forum or other social media?
 
Last edited:
Are we really doing this pedo hunt moral fagging shit on incels.co?

We talk about killing women, beating and raping them and all of a sudden wanting to fuck foids under 18 is a problem?
Yeah it doesn't make any sense. I'm against rape and murder as well but I understand that many incels are full of hatred and resentment due to all the suffering they went through at the hands of women, so I won't shame anyone here for it. If they want to repent and hear the gospel I'm always here for them.

@psygnosis-owl clearly doesn't belong here. I think he is actually a she based on how (s)he's always shaming other people's looks and saying they probably have small dicks. He claims that "pedo"cels are ruining incels' image which is dumb since it's ruined anyway and the same could be said about any politically incorrect opinion. In order to have incels' image not ruined, if that was even possible at this point, we would have to ban everything even slightly politically incorrect from here and become Reddit 2.0.
 
Last edited:
This copine thing seems legit.

You think so? You could be just a normal dad who uploads family photos of his tween daughter in a bikini to a photo album site and get your doors kicked in by cops at 6am a week later.
 
Another day, another thread by psygnosis-owl about other users with 50+ replies
 
Yeah it doesn't make any sense. @psygnosis-owl clearly doesn't belong here. I think he is actually a she based on how (s)he's always shaming other people's looks and saying they probably have small dicks.
Types like a foid too. Same illogical shitty arguments.

I dont even know why I bothered taking it seriously.

Well onto the ignore list it goes. It'll take mods another year to take out this trash

2020 08 05 13 12 51
 
@psygnosis-owl clearly doesn't belong here. I think he is actually a she based on how (s)he's always shaming other people's looks and saying they probably have small dicks. He claims that "pedo"cels are ruining incels' image which is dumb since it's ruined anyway and the same could be said about any politically incorrect opinion. In order to have incels' image not ruined, if that was even possible at this point, we would have to ban everything even slightly politically incorrect from here and become Reddit 2.0.
Could be an IT foid LARP ngl, wouldn't surprise me.
 
I gave you a link in my OP. I suggest you read ALL replies. He starts by saying teens but then admits children are fair game too.
Moralfagging isn't welcome here, kill yourself and fuck off the forum
 
@psygnosis-owl clearly doesn't belong here. I think he is actually a she based on how (s)he's always shaming other people's looks and saying they probably have small dicks.

Oh you were referring to me calling out @CelticTruecel for his anti semitism?

The same anti semitism he backpeddled out of when he lost the argument when I said peope within his discord circle were Jews but it was a reason .net got a Ddos attack?

Then I get these same anti semitic trolls trying t coax me into being anti semitism despite them calling me a "jewish cunt fuck off" like @Damo the incel who isn't banned for multiple forum rules broken.

Listen if you make a dick statement (excuse the pun) and its a mistake. Own it, don't get a mod to delete it under the guise of pulling the "incel/body shaming card" to hide the fact he fell on his own sword (trolling).

You weren't even in that thread so that proves there is no "incel community", instead skullduggery going on discord behind the scenes trying to manipulate outcomes on the forum.

That is worse than sock puppets and alt accounts, again that rule is clearly stated to discourage or ban users fom harressing active posters on behalf of permabaned users to manipulate the forum on their behalf. A rule not being upheld by any of the mods.
Moralfagging isn't welcome here, kill yourself and fuck off the forum

Encouraging suicide is illegal.
He doesn't get that going on a moral crusade is about the quickest thing that can get you banned here.

A temporary rule made up in a kangeroo court from a forum with off-shore servers?
 
Last edited:
You think so? You could be just a normal dad who uploads family photos of his tween daughter in a bikini to a photo album site and get your doors kicked in by cops at 6am a week later.
I was talking about it as a way of classification. We can debate about which level should be used to start apprehending pedophiles. And the law is not dumb enough to blindly follow it(well I'll admit they could be dumb sometimes). But for the most part I am sure each case is analyzed more than just following a scale.
 
That's just banter tbh
 
Nice, will read.

Tbh I don't really look at under 18 images too much.

I am for freedom of expression ages 13-17 and tbf the mainstream has a lot sexualised teenage imagery like Nickelodeon, fashion catalogues, music videos etc so how Mr Plod polices the copine scale is interesting.

I still think the CP TOR and Poundland wannabe mrz, boojles here on incels.co are larpers though. But not letting them off the hook as even joking about it is sick tbh.

Can you pm if you're on a different forum or other social media?


What you could find legally printed in Kay's clothing magazines -- 12yo girls in panties and bra-- circa late 80's would now be deemed CP by the plod.


The Sun newspaper had topless 16yo girls on page 3 until 1996. This is the very newspaper that loves to get lower class pleps worked up into a salivating "nonce bashing" pedo hysteria with its obsession with underage sexuality.

P.s Samantha fox was getting her knockers out for photographers at 15 but has not caused her deep traumatic stress 35 years later as far as I know.
 
Last edited:
@psygnosis-owl so why are you here if you hate this place and the users here so much? This is how I know that you're LARP, anybody who actually didn't like this place would leave, or never register in the first place.
 
Hey I do not agree with banning people just because they posted on controversial forums.
What is there stays there and unless they say there that they are not incels, they shouldn't be banned.

Also this thread looks like a light-doxx-attempt, you shouldn't try to doxx your incels buddies, they should be like brothers-in-pain to you.
 
Last edited:
Judging by your behaviour, it doesn't really seem like you belong here in the first place.

Not only have you decided to go on a crusade and accused members of being pedos without any evidence, but you are also perpetuating it and bringing other members into your crusade. This cancel culture bullshit isn't welcome on this forum and it's well known that most things posted on here are shitposts anyways, so using shitposts as proof makes no sense. I am well within my rights to warn you outside of the rules and so is every other moderator if they see you doing stuff like this. There's no "kangaroo court" when it comes to punishing members outside of the rules but this obviously goes against the spirit of the community.
based

would be awesome if you took out the trash permanently
 
A temporary rule made up in a kangeroo court from a forum with off-shore servers?
Your attempt at shaming @Diocel / trying to get him banned could be against the "no persecution" and "posting misinformation" rules.
 
BLUEPILLERS: 81
 
You dumbasses support 25 year olds getting raped but then say its wrong when it happens to a 3 year old. You have let your innate social instincts cloud your vision, just like all those normies who say they support “human rights” but then say they want child rapists to be hung and drawn and quartered in public. Jfl Diocel is the only sane one here
 
Oh you were referring to me calling out @CelticTruecel for his anti semitism?

The same anti semitism he backpeddled out of when he lost the argument when I said peope within his discord circle were Jews but it was a reason .net got a Ddos attack?

Then I get these same anti semitic trolls trying t coax me into being anti semitism despite them calling me a "jewish cunt fuck off" like @Damo the incel who isn't banned for multiple forum rules broken.

Listen if you make a dick statement (excuse the pun) and its a mistake. Own it, don't get a mod to delete it under the guise of pulling the "incel/body shaming card" to hide the fact he fell on his own sword (trolling).

You weren't even in that thread so that proves there is no "incel community", instead skullduggery going on discord behind the scenes trying to manipulate outcomes on the forum.

That is worse than sock puppets and alt accounts, again that rule is clearly stated to discourage or ban users fom harressing active posters on behalf of permabaned users to manipulate the forum on their behalf. A rule not being upheld by any of the mods.


Encouraging suicide is illegal.


A temporary rule made up in a kangeroo court from a forum with off-shore servers?
:soy:
 
Are we really doing this pedo hunt moral fagging shit on incels.co?

We talk about killing women, beating and raping them and all of a sudden wanting to fuck foids under 18 is a problem?
This thread is definitely going on IT. YO!! IT screencap me yeah, need that one minute of fame.
 
You dumbasses support 25 year olds getting raped but then say its wrong when it happens to a 3 year old. You have let your innate social instincts cloud your vision, just like all those normies who say they support “human rights” but then say they want child rapists to be hung and drawn and quartered in public. Jfl Diocel is the only sane one here
I personally believe most people on this forum do not support 3 year olds getting raped. I have that much trust in humanity. Otherwise the End couldn't come sooner.
 
Last edited:
Judging by your behaviour, it doesn't really seem like you belong here in the first place.

Not only have you decided to go on a crusade and accused members of being pedos without any evidence.

In bold hilarious.

It doesn't matter how many times your posters deny it, or threads go missing, I've got tons of screenshots of them gloating over and being proud of downloading child pornography.

I don't appreciate
- Being gaslighted and being told whats on screen, right in front of me, on a public forum isn't there when it is.
- Being called "a liar with no proof". I can understand a exposed poster talking crap, but a mod?

If anything this is meant to be an incel forum where boys talk about being disenfranchised. Yet I see incels thinking they have a shot at retracing or attempting "psychosexual milestones" as an incel at age 18-25, even older. If it didn't happen in your teen won't happen now. Plus you won't "play doctor" with a 9-12 year old as a 18 year old let alone a 50 year old.

Isn't that alone a "fakecel" if a person thinks they will get sex fullstop, let alone deluded they could get it with a prime jailbait who sexual market value if off the scale?

You've seen the Tinder statistics for so-called 20-30 year old "washed up roasties" in incel talk. If you can't attract them (who only choose 00.02% of guys) then no way in hell can an incel fuck 13-19 year olds.
 
Last edited:
You dumbasses support 25 year olds getting raped but then say its wrong when it happens to a 3 year old. You have let your innate social instincts cloud your vision, just like all those normies who say they support “human rights” but then say they want child rapists to be hung and drawn and quartered in public. Jfl Diocel is the only sane one here
 
Looks like its over.
 
Damn, go off the the forum for a whole day and there's juicy drama :feelsPop::feelsPop::feelsPop:
 
Owl got the chop
 
WTF HAPPENED?! I WAS GONE FOR JUST TWO HOURS.

TWO HOURS.

tenor.gif
 
I was about to tell that I would accept an incel who killed 200 innocent people as a friend just to make it to IT, but it'd be legally stupid to say such a thing even though I could think it.
 
WTF Did I miss?
 
In bold hilarious.

It doesn't matter how many times your posters deny it, or threads go missing, I've got tons of screenshots of them gloating over and being proud of downloading child pornography.

I don't appreciate
- Being gaslighted and being told whats on screen, right in front of me, on a public forum isn't there when it is.
- Being called "a liar with no proof". I can understand a exposed poster talking crap, but a mod?

If anything this is meant to be an incel forum where boys talk about being disenfranchised. Yet I see incels thinking they have a shot at retracing or attempting "psychosexual milestones" as an incel at age 18-25, even older. If it didn't happen in your teen won't happen now. Plus you won't "play doctor" with a 9-12 year old as a 18 year old let alone a 50 year old.

Isn't that alone a "fakecel" if a person thinks they will get sex fullstop, let alone deluded they could get it with a prime jailbait who sexual market value if off the scale?

You've seen the Tinder statistics for so-called 20-30 year old "washed up roasties" in incel talk. If you can't attract them (who only choose 00.02% of guys) then no way in hell can an incel fuck 13-19 year olds.

This post strongly indicates that this is some seething foid, if not some super salty soy cuck who hasn't had his daily shot of Tyrone's cum in his mouth.

If anything this is meant to be an incel forum where boys talk about being disenfranchised. Yet I see incels thinking they have a shot at retracing or attempting "psychosexual milestones"

Interesting use of language. Why use the phrase "where boys talk about being disenfranchised"? It's like the women who refer to men whom they don't consider "real men" so they use the term "boys."

Also, note the dissociation when talking about us. The user refers to incels along with the word "they" as if it's "them, not me."

You've seen the Tinder statistics for so-called 20-30 year old "washed up roasties" in incel talk. If you can't attract them (who only choose 00.02% of guys) then no way in hell can an incel fuck 13-19 year olds.

And later the user writes the phrase "washed up roasties" in quotation marks and calls it "incel talk," which indicates that they clearly don't approve of the term or the the we talk. Only a foid or a cuck would get mad at this phrase.

In the next sentence right after, "incel," is used dissociatively once again.

Probability of user being a foid or a soy cuck: >75%.

Back to reddit, you cunt.
 
Last edited:
This post strongly indicates that this is some seething foid, if not some super salty soy cuck who hasn't had his daily shot of Tyrone's cum in his mouth.



Interesting use of language. Why use the phrase "where boys talk about being disenfranchised"? It's like the women who refer to men whom they don't consider "real men" so they use the term "boys."

Also, note the dissociation when talking about us. The user refers to incels along with the word "they" as if it's "them, not me."



And later the user writes the phrase "washed up roasties" in quotation marks, which indicates that they clearly don't approve of the term. Only a foid or a cuck would get mad at this phrase.

In the next sentence right after, "incel," is used dissociatively once again.

Probability of user being a foid or a soy cuck: >75%.

Back to reddit, you cunt.
Giga fucking based.
 

Similar threads

Mistake
Replies
31
Views
535
Emba
Emba
Simba
Replies
23
Views
942
PraiseworthyGift
PraiseworthyGift
screwthefbi
Replies
17
Views
448
Spooky_Heejin
Spooky_Heejin
CruxGammata
Replies
10
Views
261
CruxGammata
CruxGammata

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top