Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Serious Don't be fooled, women DO NOT LIKE SEX

BUT I SAID THAT THERE WAS HUMAN INTERVENTION IN THAT PROCESS.
Calm down, Shhhh, ok ..... I do not fundamentally disagree with you

You have to be more precise than the above statement. The word "culture" is more precise than "human interaction"
THEY ARE AS MUCH ATTRACTED TO CHADS AS WE ARE TO FOIDS
If you go back to step 1 (all mammals), you will notice that any mammal female is attracted to STATUS. Even at that early stage, male and female sexual attraction rest on different principles.

So no, female are not attracted to Chads in the same way we are attracted to them.
 
Calm down, Shhhh, ok ..... I do not fundamentally disagree with you

You have to be more precise than the above statement. The word "culture" is more precise than "human interaction"/

If you go back to step 1 (all mammals), you will notice that any mammal female is attracted to STATUS. Even at that early stage, male and female sexual attraction rest on different principles.

So no, female are not attracted to Chads in the same way we are attracted to them.
WHY DID COMPANIES ADVERTISE CHADS IN FIRST PLACE? WHY NOT NOBLES AGAIN? WHY DIDN'T THEY USE THE MEMORY FROM 1000 YEARS AGO INSTEAD OF 6000?

THAT'S WHY IT'S BS THAT THEIR SEXUALITY DEVIATES IN THAT ASPECT
 
3 RANDOM NUMBERS ARE CHOSEN FROM THE SET (1,2,3...28,29,30). WHAT'S THE PROBABILITY THAT THE SUM OF THREE DISTINCT NUMBERS IS DIVISIBLE BY 3
 
There is no DIRECT (genetic) relationship between Chad's handsomeness and his ability to make foids wet.
but there is bro.. and they are mainly related to survival fitness (cultural and environmental shifts taken into account).
millions of years of mammal evolution has very strong influences on us.. our species exist for only 200k years, that's a minuscule amount of time, relatively speaking.
 
WHY DID COMPANIES ADVERTISE CHADS IN FIRST PLACE?
I explained that already. Because foids remembered what a fit male looks like (from their cavewoman days). It was not all important in the beginning as it is now, but still they prefered looking at a guy that was "easy on the eyes".
WHY NOT NOBLES AGAIN?
Because nobles had been ridiculed by this point, because of democracy. Something new was needed

By the way, Chad nobility is more "democratic" than the hereditary one, because it is basically random.
WHY DIDN'T THEY USE THE MEMORY FROM 1000 YEARS AGO INSTEAD OF 6000?
Because feudal values had collapse as a result of the industrial revolution and the political changes that resulted from it (democracy)
 
I explained that already. Because foids remembered what a fit male looks like (from their cavewoman days). It was not all important in the beginning as it is now, but still they prefered looking at a guy that was "easy on the eyes".

Because nobles had been ridiculed by this point, because of democracy. Something new was needed

By the way, Chad nobility is more "democratic" than the hereditary one, because it is basically random.

Because feudal values had collapse as a result of the industrial revolution and the political changes that resulted from it (democracy)
SO YOU BASICALLY PROVED MY POINT, THAT THE ATTRACTION IS PHYSICAL.

WELL, THEN THE SAME SHALL APPLY TO CAVEMEN, THUS THEIR STATUS WILL BE AS WORTHLESS AS THE NOBLES ONE IS, SINCE THE STRUCTURE OF THEIR SOCIETY IS COMPLETELY DIFFERENT AND SO IS WHAT MAKES ONE INDIIVIDUAL A HIGH STATUS ONE.

THERE IS A REASON WHY FOIDS FROM COMPLETELY DIFFERENT SOCIETIES STILL LUST OVER CHAD, REGARDLESS OF HIM NOT BEING WORSHIPPED ON MEDIA
 
Last edited:
but there is bro.. and they are mainly related to survival fitness (cultural and environmental shifts taken into account).
Uh? What do you mean exactly
millions of years of mammal evolution has very strong influences on us..
Ok, sure. So what?
our species exist for only 200k years, that's a minuscule amount of time, relatively speaking.
Yes, but we have language and culture (themselves the result of evolution). That makes an ENORMOUS difference in how we live. Just compare us to other mammals. A chimp has over 99% of its genes in common with us. Yet he lives more like a wolf or a lion than like us.

The 1% difference in genome btw the Chimp and us contains the genes for language and culture. A tiny thing, with an gigantic effect.

The problem you have with that is that in fact you are IGNORANT about culture.

Modern education gives all of us some knowledge of science, but it almost completely ignores culture. History is no longer seriously taught in HS, nor is literature or religion. YOU CANNOT UNDERSTAND ANYTHING ABOUT HUMAN BEHAVIOR WITHOUT DEEP CULTURAL UNDERSTANDING

Sorry, it is the way it is.
 
First of all, you should stop with the all caps. It really gives the impression that you are hysterical
SO YOU BASICALLY PROVED MY POINT, THAT THE ATTRACTION IS PHYSICAL.
No. You misunderstood what I said
WELL, THEN THE SAME SHALL APPLY TO CAVEMEN, THUS THEIR STATUS WILL BE AS WORTHLESS AS THE NOBLES ONE IS, SINCE THE STRUCTURE OF THEIR SOCIETY IS COMPLETELY DIFFERENT AND SO IS WHAT MAKES ONE INDIIVIDUAL A HIGH STATUS ONE.
I am not sure what you mean
THERE IS A REASON WHY FOIDS FROM COMPLETELY DIFFERENT SOCIETIES STILL LUST OVER CHAD, REGARDLESS OF HIM NOT BEING WORSHIPPED ON MEDIA
There are no "completely different societies" nowadays. The whole world is in the grip of Western culture.
 
First of all, you should stop with the all caps. It really gives the impression that you are hysterical

No. You misunderstood what I said

I am not sure what you mean

There are no "completely different societies" nowadays. The whole world is in the grip of Western culture.
YOU SAID MEDIA CAN'T ELEVATE NOBLES STATUS BECAUSE THEY HAD 0 STATUS IN THAT TIME, BUT THIS APPLIES EVEN MORE TO CAVEMEN.

I DIDN'T, YOU CLEARLY SAID THAT THERE WAS A PHYSICAL COMPONENT.

OF COURSE THERE IS, MEDIA VARIES FROM COUNTRY TO COUNTRY, ESPECIALLY IN THE 20TH CENTURY, BUT FOIDS THERE STILL LUSTED FOR CHAD.

MY KEYBOARD IS BROKEN
 
Uh? What do you mean exactly

Ok, sure. So what?

Yes, but we have language and culture (themselves the result of evolution). That makes an ENORMOUS difference in how we live. Just compare us to other mammals. A chimp has over 99% of its genes in common with us. Yet he lives more like a wolf or a lion than like us.

The 1% difference in genome btw the Chimp and us contains the genes for language and culture. A tiny thing, with an gigantic effect.

The problem you have with that is that in fact you are IGNORANT about culture.

Modern education gives all of us some knowledge of science, but it almost completely ignores culture. History is no longer seriously taught in HS, nor is literature or religion. YOU CANNOT UNDERSTAND ANYTHING ABOUT HUMAN BEHAVIOR WITHOUT DEEP CULTURAL UNDERSTANDING

Sorry, it is the way it is.
bro.. i know you are upset with me, i can sense you are animosity. but you make extremelly bold claims without the hard evidence to back it up.. saying that all women are not attracted to male's bodies is simply false. saying that they don't like sex is also false.

i'm not saying culture is not important. culture is extremelly important. inceldom is, in part, a symptom of modern culture. but the statements you are making really require good evidence. there's just no other way around it.
 
dunno. i dropped out of college. lol
this is a combinatory problem, i dont remember how to solve it.
IT'S MEANT FOR HIGH SCHOOLERS THOUGH, SO YOU CAN SOLVE IT
 
IT'S MEANT FOR HIGH SCHOOLERS THOUGH, SO YOU CAN SOLVE IT
most of my knwledge from highschool is gone. been years. i'm 25yo

i remember some calculus concepts that i thought were really intersting. but thats it.
 
YOU SAID MEDIA CAN'T ELEVATE NOBLES STATUS BECAUSE THEY HAD 0 STATUS IN THAT TIME, BUT THIS APPLIES EVEN MORE TO CAVEMEN.
Yes, the status of nobles had collapsed because they had become obsolete (industrial revolution). There were still some nobles around but people were laughing at them as old fogeys.

But there were no cavemen around, only some old stories about warrior heroes. As a result, people did not KNOW anything about cavemen but they were prepared to consider them as mythical heroes because of those stories (and also of genetic memory of what a physically fit male looks like). It is always easier to romanticize something you don't know (a caveman) than something you do know but despise (a traditional old fogey nobleman)

Chads were not VERY attractive to women in the 50s, because they did not have any particular status yet. However, because of those cavewoman memories, they appeared to be "easy on the eyes" to the average housewives. The Media had no particular plan. They just noticed that they were selling more soap commercials alongside shows that had Chads in them. Most housewives were not sluts either in those days. Very few would have thought of having an affair. But they became used to seeing more and more Chads all the time. Within 3 generations, their granddaughters had become addicted to Chad nobility and THEN Chads started to make them seriously wet.
I DIDN'T, YOU CLEARLY SAID THAT THERE WAS A PHYSICAL COMPONENT.
Yes, but it is not a DIRECT factor in sexual attraction. In the Middle Ages, handsomeness did not play ANY role in male attractiveness, because STATUS had been completely divorced from it.
OF COURSE THERE IS, MEDIA VARIES FROM COUNTRY TO COUNTRY, ESPECIALLY IN THE 20TH CENTURY, BUT FOIDS THERE STILL LUSTED FOR CHAD.
Compared to the differences in culture that existed in the past (say 1000 years ago) the difference that remain are negligible.
MY KEYBOARD IS BROKEN
Poorcel trait. Replace it quick because it really makes you sound like a crazy person (halo effect applied to letter case)
 
i'm not saying culture is not important. culture is extremelly important. inceldom is, in part, a symptom of modern culture. but the statements you are making really require good evidence. there's just no other way around it.
The problem is that you are ignorant of that evidence. That is why I cannot mention it. It would not mean anything to you.
 
Lol major cope

You are moron io hahhahaa


Ugly piece of shit trash like me and you with muttliated damaged penis ?

Of course not

But to think they do are not more horny than males is major cope.

Foids are more perverted and horny only for chad and tyrone
 
my reasoning was that one in three numbers are divisible by three, guess i wasn't thinking of 0.
I THOUGHT YOU DID ALL THE CALCULATIONS
 
[UWSL]the most instinctive, carnal, biological, impulsive sex is a thing for men. Women feel aroused with chads but not because of their muscles per se, not because of their penis per se, not because of their jaw per se (they wouldn't suck it for hours like WE WOULD DO with their tits for example) but they feel an "excitement". /excitation" when detecting high-level genes. He just wants to spread his legs and get his seed.[/UWSL]

[UWSL][UWSL]Women are not turned on by any part of a man's body at all. None. While porn is full of fetishes for feet, hips, tits, ass, legs, and any part of a woman's body, women don't really care about a guy's anus, testicles, or feet. Her arousal comes from knowing that the alpha male is getting turned on by her.[/UWSL][/UWSL]
[UWSL]I'm not saying he doesn't enjoy it, but his sexuality is very different from that of men. Just like you don't enjoy a $100 bill per se, which is just paper, but which you KNOW will allow you to buy other things. Women don't give a shit about men's bodies, what their brain/instinct tells them is that they will get good genes for their offspring. It is not so difficult to understand[/UWSL]
Exactly. They don't give a shit about any special part of men. THEY DON'T EVEN FEEL EXCITED WHEN SUCKING A DICK, BUT THEIR EXCITATION COMES FROM KNOWING THAT THEY ARE PLEASURING THE MALE. They like big dicks BECAUSE THEY GIVE THEM GREATER VAGINAL PLEASURE, but not at all visual, they don't give a shit, women are not visual.

[UWSL][UWSL]For better understanding. If we see big tits, we don't get excited because our hand will feel pleasure, but because of themselves we already love them. and just seeing them we get excited and have an erection. Women ARE NOT EXCITED by seeing a big cock, but in any case, by imagining that THEIR VAGINA will feel more pleasure, but they don't even think about it. It is only when the cock is inside the vagina that they feel sexual pleasure. A woman sees a picture of a big dick in a magazine and it's like seeing a lettuce or a snail. Understanding this is very important.[/UWSL][/UWSL]
[UWSL]I really like that you understand it, not like some retards here. It is so evident that women do not like men's bodies, but what they like is to see that the man has pleasure through the girl's body. See him excited. Feel desired. That's why all the shit about twerking, sensual dances, provocation, innuendo, sexy lingerie, streptese... it's so obvious... it's not that hard to understand, thanks for understanding[/UWSL]
[UWSL]What I mean is that their sexuality is very different from ours. They like Chad as a whole but no specific part in the plan that they would suck his jaw for hours (as we would if we would do with the tits for example). THEY DON'T GET EXCITED seeing a penis in a photograph, they don't watch porn, they don't have foot fetishes, they don't like Chad's anus, they don't masturbate thinking about biceps (but that Chad fucks them like an animal, but she can be with her eyes closed or with her back, her desire comes from the fact that they have "gotten" the alpha male)[/UWSL]
[UWSL]For you to understand it better, you can enjoy an ice cream, but YOU DON'T NEED AN ICE CREAM, you can enjoy a good movie, BUT YOU DON'T NEED A GOOD MOVIE, you can enjoy a trip in a ferrari, but you DON'T NEED A FERRARI, you can enjoy an amusement park but you DON'T NEED an amusement park...it's the same with women...if they were on a desert island they wouldn't even masturbate...if there were no chads they wouldn't even fuck a normie ... men HAVE A BIOLOGICAL IMPULSE, LIKE PISSING, SLEEPING OR ALMOST SHITTING, while women are like "oh, yes, it's great, but if I don't do it, nothing happens". women could go their WHOLE LIFE WITHOUT NO FAP and not give a shit, like we could go our whole life without eating ice cream.[/UWSL]
[UWSL]Seeing a chad they feel a visual pleasure as you might feel seeing a beautiful landscape. Just like when they see a pretty girl (bisexualpill) but that is VERY FAR from our biological, animal, bodily arousal, from every square centimeter of a woman's body, from every thousandth of skin, from every corner. I would suck tits for hours and hours, I see a cleavage and I get excited... THEY DON'T GET Aroused BY THE GENITALS, NOR THE ASS, NOR ANY FUCKING PART OF A MAN'S BODY, They only detect an outfit that makes them sexually available immediate to obtain chad's seed, like a mare that raises her tail to be penetrated by the horse, which is beside itself, excited, nervous[/UWSL]
The :bluepill: invasion is beginning.
 
They like Chad’s big dick and abs and good structured face
 
What? You’re not making any sense at all bro.
 
Cope, women are attracted to mens bodies that are broad shouldered, tall, and ripped. I still remember when Magic Mike came out literally every foid went to see that movie where it’s just a bunch of chads dancing half naked
 
[UWSL]We're mammals, dammit. To understand female sexuality you only have to look at the rest of the mammals: deer, gorillas, elephants, seals... it is the males who are ACTIVE and fight to get pussy while women are PASSIVE and wait for the winner, the alpha, and if a beta loser approaches them they run away in disgust. Then they simply put their pussies at his disposal, raising their tails like mares. Watch a horse fucking, excited, energetic, erect, tense, out of it, while the female is just calm, passive and raises her tail to get penetrated and get the best genes.[/UWSL]

Godzilla tier cope.

Women under a certain age CANNOT HELP wanting to have sex with men they find attractive.

Yes, the female sexual drive is lower but it EXISTS and it's REACTIVE to GORGEOUS and ATTRACTIVE MEN.

Your place on the MALE GORGEOUS HIEARCHY determines how manyy "signals" you will receive from foids.

Your scenario is a red-pill cope in that it gives you incentive/hope that you will ascend if you gain status.

Didn't Henry Kissinger say something like "power is the greatest aphrodisiac"? What kind of sexual acceptance did Kissinger receive? I mean just look at him:



henry-kissinger-GettyImages-515575278.jpg


He probably got with looksmatched foids...and only because of his status. Big whoop. Imagine a way more attractive woman being with him. I bet you if it happened she merely endured him.

Why were Weinstein and Epstein legitimate creeps?

BECAUSE THEIR WEALTH AND STATUS DID NOT TRANSLATE INTO SEXUAL STATUS.

Yea, Harvey Weinstein may have had Gweneth Paltrow watch him take a shower or whatever. He may have gotten with some actresses but he never had their enthusiastic consent due to BEING UGLY.

Women have BEAUTY STANDARDS for men and their arousal is dependent on this. "muh status" is a BIG FUCKING COPE.

Yes, if you gain enough status women will prostitute themselves to you.

For example, in order to boost her career, a young and comely Kamala Harris prostituted herself to a man in his 60s with political power named Willie Brown:

Willie_Brown_by_Gage_Skidmore.jpg




31909002-8623781-image-m-50_1597334238747.jpg


Kamala Harris photographed next to Willie Brown, under whose long and hard tutelage she came under.

Seems to me the above scenario ain't that much better than getting with actual sex workers.
 
Last edited:
On the other hand, the reason the males of the KENNEDY clan -- and Bill Clinton -- received sexual success is because THEY ARE GOOD LOOKING.

JFK managed to have sex with MARLYN MONROE in her PEAK because he was ATTRACTIVE.

That same woman however was prostituting herself to Arthur Miller.

JFK got eager monkey sex from Marlyn Monroe. Arthur Miller only got starfish sex.
 
Last edited:
Yes, absolutely. But they are not having sex with his body (like we do); they are having sex with his status
Cope. High status men get cheated on by their wives fucking young chads.
 
Exactly. They don't give a shit about any special part of men. THEY DON'T EVEN FEEL EXCITED WHEN SUCKING A DICK, BUT THEIR EXCITATION COMES FROM KNOWING THAT THEY ARE PLEASURING THE MALE. They like big dicks BECAUSE THEY GIVE THEM GREATER VAGINAL PLEASURE, but not at all visual, they don't give a shit, women are not visual.
Keep coping


Dickpill mega
 
Last edited:
The TRUTH about female sexual nature SPOILS the beta-bux/status game.

Robin Williams and Anthony Bourdain killed themselves because the whole beta bux/status thing did not result in receiving more genuine female love.
 
This is some massive fucking cope.
 
[UWSL]the most instinctive, carnal, biological, impulsive sex is a thing for men. Women feel aroused with chads but not because of their muscles per se, not because of their penis per se, not because of their jaw per se (they wouldn't suck it for hours like WE WOULD DO with their tits for example) but they feel an "excitement". /excitation" when detecting high-level genes. He just wants to spread his legs and get his seed.[/UWSL]

[UWSL][UWSL]Women are not turned on by any part of a man's body at all. None. While porn is full of fetishes for feet, hips, tits, ass, legs, and any part of a woman's body, women don't really care about a guy's anus, testicles, or feet. Her arousal comes from knowing that the alpha male is getting turned on by her.[/UWSL][/UWSL]
They love the feelings they get from sex. That's why for example dick size doesn't matter that much in real life
 
Women love and crave sex however it is with chad only.

The reason you dont see it in their behavior is because you are not chad
 
chads and foids have life in tutorial mode :yes:
 
I don’t know what to believe anymore
 
nice mental gymnastics
 
Women have lower sex drive than men. We men would fuck most women but women wouldn't do the same. This lower sex drive makes them naturally crave only the top 20 percent of men in terms of looks, which is a mechanism made for them to want only the best genetics possible. They are attracted to men's bodies but most men don't turn them on. They have a higher threshold for looks. If women lived in a world full of Chads, they would be fucking and cheating like mad. Yes, there would be giga chads and more attractive men but the pool of men they find attractive would increase significantly.
 
Women have lower sex drive than men. We men would fuck most women but women wouldn't do the same. This lower sex drive makes them naturally crave only the top 20 percent of men in terms of looks, which is a mechanism made for them to want only the best genetics possible. They are attracted to men's bodies but most men don't turn them on. They have a higher threshold for looks. If women lived in a world full of Chads, they would be fucking and cheating like mad. Yes, there would be giga chads and more attractive men but the pool of men they find attractive would increase significantly.
 
Wtf is this stupid thread. Men obviously have a higher sex drive than women but saying they don’t like it at all is a blatant lie. If that was true then they wouldn’t be chads fucktoy
 
Wtf is this stupid thread. Men obviously have a higher sex drive than women but saying they don’t like it at all is a blatant lie. If that was true then they wouldn’t be chads fucktoy
Yeah this thread is pretty stupid.

On the other hand I've seen people say women want sex just as much as men, which is also stupid.
 

Similar threads

Devilspawncel
Replies
9
Views
334
blackpillednigga
blackpillednigga
L
Replies
34
Views
674
screwthefbi
screwthefbi
sultryloser
Replies
63
Views
3K
XDFLAMEBOY
XDFLAMEBOY

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top