Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Blackpill [Hard To Swallow Edition] Masturbation Could Never Be A Substitute For Sex (Sexbots Are Nothing But A Cope)

English is your 2nd language with how badly you have interpreted this thread
Of course it's not my native language. You talked about bullshit from the start to the end of your thread. Do you want me to quote the shit you wrote? Literally, every argument you make is just you talking about what you like to do with women. You like to be dominant, you don't like porns because you can't satisfy your urges in such a way...

And then about robots: the cope argument, as usual.

Every thing you don't like is cope, as usual. This is typical attitude of a cuck who can only create arguments based on how he feels, not using logic.

Because the main reason why (some) people do prefer sexdolls, it's because of the unique experience they can provide. Or, because of other things, unrelated to your own personal copes.

I can tell you why I don't like to go find prostitutes: Tiresome, I need to search around forums (escortforums), check my local area, be in touch with the community to find what I like, travel long distances. And maybe I discover that what I payed for is not what I wanted (it happened) and what I was willing to pay for.

This discussion is almost pointless. Almost every argument made by a validation addicted cuck is basically just him telling you what he wants, and then projecting his own preferences to extend them into universal rules. You're talking like every man in the whole world has the same fetishes you have. I have my own degenerate fetishes.
 
I've seen many times on this site users claiming that masturbation solves the issue of sexual urges and I think its time this nonsense was addressed once and for all and the coping stops

Saying that masturbation solves the issue of sexual urges is like saying just eating a lot of bread solves the issue of hunger

There's more to satisfying hunger than simply being full, just like there's more to satisfying sexual urges than simply ejaculating

If the food doesn't taste good you won't get much of a dopamine release from eating

If the food isn't nutritionally balanced your body won't have any resources to keep you healthy and functioning and in essence you will still feel fatigued and starved since you'll be deficient in nutrients, etc

Masturbation will never be enough because it is missing an aspect to it, that is what truly makes sex enjoyable for a man, DOMINANCE

There's a deeper satisfaction you get when you make a woman submit to your sexual whims, porn tries to imitate this phenomenon with the "money shot", that's the entire point of the "money shot", that's why its a staple in porn, its a means for you to live vicariously through that act, and see a woman in complete sexual submission, face covered in your seed, its an act of shaming the woman whilst simultaneously "marking/branding" her as yours, its like planting a flag on territory you've claimed, like how a dog pees on things it wants to let other dogs know its theirs, there's something very "primal" about it, and that's whats satisfying about sex, YOU CAN'T GET THAT FROM JERKING YOUR DICK

Masturbation can never be as satisfying as sex, I've had sex once (prostitute) and its a completely different experience, its ridiculous to compare sitting down, stroking your dick waiting to cum so you can stop thinking about sex, TO ACTUALLY PARTICIPATING IN THE ACT OF SEX RATHER THAN JUST ENDLESSLY THINKING ABOUT AND OBSESSING OVER IT

Its a very ironic statement to say that masturbation is a substitute for sex, here's why, try and follow the logic, if stroking your dick to an act satisfies you, WOULDN'T ACTUALLY DOING THE ACT SATISFY YOU MORE? (simple and obvious question to ask yourself)

This is common sense, of course its more satisfying and masturbation could never substitute it, just as bread could never substitute an entire diet

You don't even need to have sex to come to this realization, you just need to stop coping and think this through

To go even further this is why I think sex-bots are a cope, because you could never emulate that experience with a robot, you can't dominate something that you own and it can't really refuse, or resist your sex acts. A sex bot doesn't submit its body to you, it has no ownership of its body to begin with

Imagine the most amazing sexbot ever, it looks completely human, its a perfect 10/10 for you, guess what, you'll be bored with it after a fucking month, maybe even 2 weeks, and if you get a new and different one, you'll notice that you are becoming bored with sexbots on the whole, because it isn't satisfying your subconscious mind, the deeper and more primal parts of your mind (monkey brain, lizard brain, etc)

Sexual release without a partner, is nothing but surface level satisfaction, it won't truly satisfy you, it will always be "just enough to get you by", but it will never satisfy

Without domination there is no complete sexual satisfaction for a man, you are always going to feel like "something is missing", and no it isn't "love" or "affection", its dominance, the feeling of conquering someone, having them submit to you, the feeling of ownership and the security that comes with it, masturbation can't substitute that
Ok Mr.ifuckapussy... well you are not a incel anymore.
@Master ban this non incel he fuck a pussy.
 
Ok Mr.ifuckapussy... well you are not a incel anymore.
@Master ban this non incel he fuck a pussy.

You do realize that the implication of this statement is that in order for a man to "remain" incel (remain in contact with men who share his plight), he has to KEEP HIMSELF SEXUALLY STARVED AND NOT PURSUE ANY ALTERNATIVES

In other words BE VOLCEL, which is a contradiction, because you can't be both volcel AND incel

So are you admitting, that you have and will continue to refuse any alternative means to attain sex outside of female validation?
 
Last edited:
You do realize that the implication of this statement is that in order for a man to "remain" incel (remain in contact with men who share his plight), he has to KEEP HIMSELF SEXUALLY STARVED AND NOT PURSUE ANY ALTERNATIVES

In other words BE VOLCEL, which is a contradiction, because you can't be both volcel AND incel

So are you admitting, that you have and will continue to refuse any alternative means to attain sex outside of female validation?
Do you realize you are a cuck right ?
You pay women who don't giva fuck about you unless you give them $$$ that means you are a cuck and you don't have a honor about yourself because you know is over and you can't get free sex only if you pay.
It is better to jerk off(free$$$)
Paying for sex(cost$$$)cuck intensified.
 
Do you realize you are a cuck right ?
You pay women who don't giva fuck about you unless you give them $$$ that means you are a cuck and you don't have a honor about yourself because you know is over and you can't get free sex only if you pay.
It is better to jerk off(free$$$)
Paying for sex(cost$$$)cuck intensified.

One thing I will agree with you on is that I don't have any honor, you have accepted your societal indoctrination so easy, honor, justice, morality, its all pointless and subjective BS, doesn't really mean anything, and its all driven by ones ego, and you are obviously an egoist, since you actually care so much about what others think of you, the point of paying for sex is exactly the fact that the women don't care about you, its a transaction idiot, you are paying for a service

Do you refuse to purchase fast food because the workers at the outlets don't care about you personally, nope I'm sure you still buy KFC, etc, its really no different, I'm purchasing a product for my use, its guys like you who are cucked, you see women as humans rather than objects for your use, so you feel bad if a "person" doesn't like you

I'd probably enjoy the sex more if I knew the whore hated me JFL, the irony of you calling me a cuck when its you who has the cucked mindset, talk about cognitive dissonance.
 
Yeah dude you are right, we have a primal need to play with our genitalia while watching others of ours species having sex, rather than actually having sex........ makes perfect sense, masturbation is definitely not just a cope
Chuckled quite hard right here.

JFL at sexbotcopers, foid subjugation is the only way. Great thread as usual.
 
This thread is functional, generating comic and laughable debates; yes, the argument that "masturbation" is no substitute for a genuine experience of coitus is correct: Ejecting sperm, yes, is "misleading" the brain that a reproduction has been made, as if fulfilling the evolutionary goal, is a "lie. Even though, even with this trick planted in the brain, the need for real sex is linked to factors such as Status and Power, and Power is what motivates all beings: So, in theory, the Will to Power not being effected, but only in the "hand" as an orgiastic object of obscenity and derision, not in an attractive foid, Power is not satisfied because it is insufficient and the object of effectuation of Power is diminished in quantum, for in self- erotic satisfaction the realization of Power is being effected in itself, and this realization itself does not fulfill the goal of expanding the innate Will of Power in beings; so that's it, whatever
 
I don't think you read my post properly, by dominate I don't mean just extreme stuff like some BDSM shit, during sex a woman submits her body to your usage, you are dominating a woman by default by having sex with her, because she has to SUBMIT to your acts, sex is inherently about dominant and submissive roles.

When I say dominance I don't mean just extreme and violent things, the act of dominating isn't just that, sex is inherently an act of submission for women (the penetrated), and an act of dominance for men (the penetrator). The feeling of someone submitting to you cannot be replaced by masturbation or sex bots, because something that doesn't have a consciousness cannot submit, its an object.

Are you seriously going to argue you vigorously pounding your loins into someone over and over until you release bodily excretions into and/or inside them, isn't a physically dominating act?

You can go ahead and make that argument, and that's where I stop arguing lol
Its not so simple though. Sex doesn't have to be dominator over dominated. Foids like that and so do some men. The issue here is that sex is ultimately mutual. The difference between rape and sex is whether the foid wants you to fuck her or not. She is validating your needs and desires by letting you fuck her consenually.

You might dominate her physically, but not psychologically. She still has reign over your need to dominate, thus controlling you. You couch this in "submission". Think of a barking dog. When the owner throws some meat to the dog, it stops barking. Does the dog dominate its owner? Does the owner submit to the dog? Substitue men for dogs and foids for their owners. She doesn't have to feed you. She can starve you if she wants. If you try to bite her to get meat, then its rape. Rape is punished by society. This is why women possess so much power in modern society. They control meat and many men act like dogs.

I personally don't care for the submission aspect of sex you seem to stress on. Sex to me means something else than it does to you. I see sex as nothing more than a physical act. Its the stuff surrounding the sex that makes me happy.

The sexbot route could work for me because even though its not conscious, it still could simulate the experience well enough to temporarily trick my mind. Perhaps permanently if drugs or neurostimulation techniques are involved. And lets be honest, women are temporary. Their love for you is as real as the love a sexbot can provide. Why not sub them in? If this is an indication of mental illness, so be it. My only goal is to be happy for once. Idk if that requires complex delusions, as most relationships are like that already.
 
One thing I will agree with you on is that I don't have any honor, you have accepted your societal indoctrination so easy, honor, justice, morality, its all pointless and subjective BS, doesn't really mean anything, and its all driven by ones ego, and you are obviously an egoist, since you actually care so much about what others think of you, the point of paying for sex is exactly the fact that the women don't care about yomou, its a transaction idiot, you are paying for a service

Do you refuse to purchase fast food because the workers at the outlets don't care about you personally, nope I'm sure you still buy KFC, etc, its really no different, I'm purchasing a product for my use, its guys like you who are cucked, you see women as humans rather than objects for your use, so you feel bad if a "person" doesn't like you

I'd probably enjoy the sex more if I knew the whore hated me JFL, the irony of you calling me a cuck when its you who has the cucked mindset, talk about cognitive dissonance.
Cope combined with Hypocrisy the proof is why are you on this forum in the first place if you don't have honor,justice, morality(you call it BS) once again you try to protect your cuck lifestyle (hypocryisy is strong with you)we are all cucks In one from or another because some people release sexual needs by fapping others by escorting(speaking about ugly men) but you know what the difference is between two category is you/they pay and we don't and that means we are not that cucks as you call us "cuck mentality caring about others"
We can go to escort anytime but we know is worthless paying a women who doesn't like us to initiate sexual contact with us she's doing what is doing for money and the experience is mediocre even worse or cringe.
You can't compare pay sex with free sex is Sky, Earth difference.
And yes I'm a egoistic person because I'm a human, born with a ego and you are?...also a egoistic person trying to protect your egoistic thought and now you want to win a argument to feel satisfy about your egoistic mindset(ooo..look "I'm Smart" that's is selfhonor ops but you say you don't have honor ops Hypocryisy detected again).
And yes I care about what people think about me because I can't change that it is not in my power and yes you care also what people think about you(if you say No you are a "Hypocrite" that means you are lying)the proof is your whole history on the incels.co/internet,etc

The Truth is we are all cucks(to comeback to the subject) but some people pay some people don't (speaking about ugly men).

Lifeisbullshit we are bound to suffer and to be mock until we die.

Just don't think about what other think about you theory.

legit legit legit
Tbhtbht htbhtbh.
 
PoshMelodicEgg size restricted
 
i wanna try that, but not with that anime shit
its just an april fools joke unfortunately, we'll have to wait another decade for something like that
 
Who would think otherwise? This isn't blackpill, it's common sense. The two can be comparable to a certain point and in certain aspects, but they will never be the same for obvious reasons.
 
i can sorta confirm this. feeling of phone sex is way defferent then porn. it's more personalize. fact that i amble to say anything and make her submit is primal.

Nonetheless its nothing what chad gets. he can slap her in the face and tell her to get on her knees to suck his cock and she will do it happily
 
I feel like this should be common knowledge.
Fapping is just a cope. But at least we have that instead of nothing at all.
 
I feel like this should be common knowledge.
Fapping is just a cope. But at least we have that instead of nothing at all.
yeah i guess its an ok cope. otherwise ill be walking around with a raging boner. Actually to be honest i hardly masturbated when i was younger. just when i hit 22+ for some reason my hormones changed and started masturbating to random pics or gifs of girls.
 
OP, i need know your IQ, all your posts seems strangely too BlackPill and too High IQ, really really strange.
 
OP, i need know your IQ, all your posts seems strangely too BlackPill and too High IQ, really really strange.

Never actually did a test and I don't see the point

I've always argued that

1. CSQ (Common Sense Quotient) > IQ (Intelligence Quotient)

2. Intelligence is just a substitute for actual capability (made a thread about it too)

Having a high IQ doesn't mean anything if you do nothing with it, and that's why its pointless, imagine if all I planned on doing with my life, was to come online here everyday and make posts, that doesn't sound very smart to me, so even lets say that was my goal and I had a 200+IQ, in my book I'd still be an idiot, there are also many men with low IQ's who have certain skills/knowledge (especially in the business world) who have struck it rich, being high IQ wasn't necessary for that

I feel like IQ is a cope a lot of people cling to so they can have something to feel good about, being high IQ and not applying it in any way that leads to your success is not boast worthy, its not something to be proud of, so it doesn't matter how high IQ I am until I becoming successful via said IQ

The results of an IQ test would make no difference to me, I'd still pursue all my goals the same way

I feel a lot of people take the test to give themselves an excuse to relax and do nothing with their lives

1. You discover you're high IQ and you become proud and complacent and do nothing
2. You discover you're low IQ and you use that as an excuse as to why you are a failure and give up to do nothing

People who take these tests are "looking for something", I'm not looking for anything, all I know is that I have to do something to get what I want from life, that's all I needed to know, the rules of the game, I'm going to play regardless
 
Never actually did a test and I don't see the point

I've always argued that

1. CSQ (Common Sense Quotient) > IQ (Intelligence Quotient)

2. Intelligence is just a substitute for actual capability (made a thread about it too)

Having a high IQ doesn't mean anything if you do nothing with it, and that's why its pointless, imagine if all I planned on doing with my life, was to come online here everyday and make posts, that doesn't sound very smart to me, so even lets say that was my goal and I had a 200+IQ, in my book I'd still be an idiot, there are also many men with low IQ's who have certain skills/knowledge (especially in the business world) who have struck it rich, being high IQ wasn't necessary for that

I feel like IQ is a cope a lot of people cling to so they can have something to feel good about, being high IQ and not applying it in any way that leads to your success is not boast worthy, its not something to be proud of, so it doesn't matter how high IQ I am until I becoming successful via said IQ

The results of an IQ test would make no difference to me, I'd still pursue all my goals the same way

I feel a lot of people take the test to give themselves an excuse to relax and do nothing with their lives

1. You discover you're high IQ and you become proud and complacent and do nothing
2. You discover you're low IQ and you use that as an excuse as to why you are a failure and give up to do nothing

People who take these tests are "looking for something", I'm not looking for anything, all I know is that I have to do something to get what I want from life, that's all I needed to know, the rules of the game, I'm going to play regardless


Is very nice, i understand and i like your posts.
 
There is a lot more to sex than just orgasming. Skin to skin contact, pheromones and smells, emotional bonding, ect.

Anything other than a submissive virgin wife is cope. That’s why all major religions valued and enforced virgin brides. The Christian metaphor of true Christians being the virgin bride ordained in white.

Everything is fucking cope, the disgusting humanist luciferian elite have successfully destroyed everything. Armageddon is nigh.
7932F4CD 09BF 4020 B878 32D8F4AE66F2
 
i can sorta confirm this. feeling of phone sex is way defferent then porn. it's more personalize. fact that i amble to say anything and make her submit is primal.

Nonetheless its nothing what chad gets. he can slap her in the face and tell her to get on her knees to suck his cock and she will do it happily
Next level shit, but still not good enough


Dude, phone sex is literally just porn, auditory porn, you're still just jerking off to a form of stimuli rather than interacting with a physical body, you can't confirm anything, your comparison is ridiculous

I'll go a step further. You could program a chatbot program to act the exact way many foids do in your chadfish experiments given enough sample data. Enough that it would be difficult to determine between a real foid and a bot.

Not knowing if you were talking to a bot or person, would you feel the same in terms of satisfaction?
 
I'll go a step further. You could program a chatbot program to act the exact way many foids do in your chadfish experiments given enough sample data. Enough that it would be difficult to determine between a real foid and a bot.

Not knowing if you were talking to a bot or person, would you feel the same in terms of satisfaction?
that just might be crazy enough to work. most foids act very same. a bot might be able to replicate how all of them act around chad
 
The thought experiment presumes you don't know its a bot.

He didn't even address that part, how it would make him feel if he didn't know or not, he just focused on that it might actually be possible
 
He didn't even address that part, how it would make him feel if he didn't know or not, he just focused on that it might actually be possible
It technically is, even with current tech. Replicating 18 yo thot speak is easy enough given a large enough sample. You could even hookup a Wavenet based voice processor and replicate her manner of speaking too. Chad could be simulated too tbh.

You know what would be truely devilish? Replicating Chads using AI and then leading on thousands of hypergamous foids simulataneously for weeks, using the convos generated to feed ThotBot on the male side.
 
It technically is, even with current tech. Replicating 18 yo thot speak is easy enough given a large enough sample. You could even hookup a Wavenet based voice processor and replicate her manner of speaking too. Chad could be simulated too tbh.

You know what would be truely devilish? Replicating Chads using AI and then leading on thousands of hypergamous foids simulataneously for weeks, using the convos generated to feed ThotBot on the male side.

JFL maybe I could start a phone sex agency and make 100% profit by using bots
 
JFL maybe I could start a phone sex agency and make 100% profit by using bots
Surprised somebody hasn't done this. You would need lots of seed data to train the bot, but it'll self perpetuating after a while.
 
Last edited:
Surprised somebody hasn't done this. You would need lots of seed data to train the bot, but it'll self perpetuating after a while.

Hardest part would be getting a realistic and attractive sounding voice software
 
Whores are always complaining about how Chad uses their body to masturbate so I don't know. Apparently sex is only a bit better than masturbation physically, but maybe the mental aspect is also miles more enjoyable. I would imagine the contact alone would be very exciting alone.
 
Last edited:
This is why I believe the physical satisfaction a man gets from the act of rape likely far exceeds that of a consensual sex act,, and this is why men who rape once always go on to rape again.

Think about it, the men who rape (especially serial rapists) know full well they can possibly be arrested and sent to jail, killed, get an std, etc, its a very risky crime where you can leave dna and get caught, but they ignore all of that and still pursue the act again and again and again, and that's because the pleasure and feeling of power and satisfaction it grants overrides all logic, a man will do almost anything to attain that feeling again
That's why even prostitutes (or normal women where the sex is consensual can get boring). I think even prostitutes (or normal women who you pay indirectly by paying for taking them out/buying them presents) are not substitute for the real thing.
P.S. I'm neither advocating for rape nor saying I will rape anyone, just saying that the dominant part of the rape (which is not fake) is far more enjoyable than the regular starfish sex.
 
I've seen many times on this site users claiming that masturbation solves the issue of sexual urges and I think its time this nonsense was addressed once and for all and the coping stops

Saying that masturbation solves the issue of sexual urges is like saying just eating a lot of bread solves the issue of hunger

There's more to satisfying hunger than simply being full, just like there's more to satisfying sexual urges than simply ejaculating

If the food doesn't taste good you won't get much of a dopamine release from eating

If the food isn't nutritionally balanced your body won't have any resources to keep you healthy and functioning and in essence you will still feel fatigued and starved since you'll be deficient in nutrients, etc

Masturbation will never be enough because it is missing an aspect to it, that is what truly makes sex enjoyable for a man, DOMINANCE

There's a deeper satisfaction you get when you make a woman submit to your sexual whims, porn tries to imitate this phenomenon with the "money shot", that's the entire point of the "money shot", that's why its a staple in porn, its a means for you to live vicariously through that act, and see a woman in complete sexual submission, face covered in your seed, its an act of shaming the woman whilst simultaneously "marking/branding" her as yours, its like planting a flag on territory you've claimed, like how a dog pees on things it wants to let other dogs know its theirs, there's something very "primal" about it, and that's whats satisfying about sex, YOU CAN'T GET THAT FROM JERKING YOUR DICK

Masturbation can never be as satisfying as sex, I've had sex once (prostitute) and its a completely different experience, its ridiculous to compare sitting down, stroking your dick waiting to cum so you can stop thinking about sex, TO ACTUALLY PARTICIPATING IN THE ACT OF SEX RATHER THAN JUST ENDLESSLY THINKING ABOUT AND OBSESSING OVER IT

Its a very ironic statement to say that masturbation is a substitute for sex, here's why, try and follow the logic, if stroking your dick to an act satisfies you, WOULDN'T ACTUALLY DOING THE ACT SATISFY YOU MORE? (simple and obvious question to ask yourself)

This is common sense, of course its more satisfying and masturbation could never substitute it, just as bread could never substitute an entire diet

You don't even need to have sex to come to this realization, you just need to stop coping and think this through

To go even further this is why I think sex-bots are a cope, because you could never emulate that experience with a robot, you can't dominate something that you own and it can't really refuse, or resist your sex acts. A sex bot doesn't submit its body to you, it has no ownership of its body to begin with

Imagine the most amazing sexbot ever, it looks completely human, its a perfect 10/10 for you, guess what, you'll be bored with it after a fucking month, maybe even 2 weeks, and if you get a new and different one, you'll notice that you are becoming bored with sexbots on the whole, because it isn't satisfying your subconscious mind, the deeper and more primal parts of your mind (monkey brain, lizard brain, etc)

Sexual release without a partner, is nothing but surface level satisfaction, it won't truly satisfy you, it will always be "just enough to get you by", but it will never satisfy

Without domination there is no complete sexual satisfaction for a man, you are always going to feel like "something is missing", and no it isn't "love" or "affection", its dominance, the feeling of conquering someone, having them submit to you, the feeling of ownership and the security that comes with it, masturbation can't substitute that
Ngl I kinda like when I get dominated. And I know it's very pathetic and cucked. But I can't help but have a little kink for femdom. But yeah most men prefer to dominate the female
 
To go even further this is why I think prostitutes are a cope, because you could never emulate that experience with a prostitute, you can't dominate something that you own and it can't really refuse, or resist your sex acts. A prostitute doesn't submit its body to you, it has no ownership of its body to begin with

Imagine the most amazing prostitute ever, it looks completely human, its a perfect 10/10 for you, guess what, you'll be bored with it after a fucking month, maybe even 2 weeks, and if you get a new and different one, you'll notice that you are becoming bored with prostitutes on the whole, because it isn't satisfying your subconscious mind, the deeper and more primal parts of your mind (monkey brain, lizard brain, etc)

Sexual release without a partner, is nothing but surface level satisfaction, it won't truly satisfy you, it will always be "just enough to get you by", but it will never satisfy
 
Ngl I kinda like when I get dominated. And I know it's very pathetic and cucked. But I can't help but have a little kink for femdom. But yeah most men prefer to dominate the female
You're going to need to find another fetish lol.

No woman is ever going to want to do that with you, and any woman you pay to do that to you will probably try to manipulate you into doing cuck shit.

Have you ever heard of "findom", that isn't misspelled, google it. That's the kinda cucked mindset men like you are at risk of falling into as your wealth grows over time.
 
You're going to need to find another fetish lol.

No woman is ever going to want to do that with you, and any woman you pay to do that to you will probably try to manipulate you into doing cuck shit.

Have you ever heard of "findom", that isn't misspelled, google it. That's the kinda cucked mindset men like you are at risk of falling into as your wealth grows over time.
Yeah just searched it up. Maybe I mistaked some of my fetishes for femdom. I still like to dominate and feel like a beast. Would you consider ass eating part of femdom?
 
Yeah just searched it up. Maybe I mistaked some of my fetishes for femdom. I still like to dominate and feel like a beast. Would you consider ass eating part of femdom?
I'm not doing any kind of ass eating or anything like that lol.

But it depends on whose ass is being eat, if you are doing the eating it's not femdom. If I'm watching porn and I see any woman go to do that shit I delete the video immediately lol. That shit is effeminate as fuck and the men look gay as well when they go into these submissive positions so that the woman can lick their crack.

If you took a screenshot of any of those scenes and you photoshopped the woman out and left only the man, you'd assume it was from a gay porn based on the effeminate submissive position the man was in.
 
I'm not doing any kind of ass eating or anything like that lol.

But it depends on whose ass is being eat, if you are doing the eating it's not femdom. If I'm watching porn and I see any woman go to do that shit I delete the video immediately lol. That shit is effeminate as fuck and the men look gay as well when they go into these submissive positions so that the woman can lick their crack.

If you took a screenshot of any of those scenes and you photoshopped the woman out and left only the man, you'd assume it was from a gay porn based on the effeminate submissive position the man was in.
Oh hell no! I meant the man eating out the woman. That's what I meant. I cant help it. Eating ass is kinda hot to me. I would never to get my ass eaten tho. Tf. So your telling me you wouldnt eat out this girls ass(in the picture)? 99% of men would happily do so. Eating ass is actually pretty common.
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20220221_200320.jpg
    Screenshot_20220221_200320.jpg
    90.2 KB · Views: 19
Oh hell no! I meant the man eating out the woman. That's what I meant. I cant help it. Eating ass is kinda hot to me. I would never to get my ass eaten tho. Tf. So your telling me you wouldnt eat out this girls ass(in the picture)? 99% of men would happily do so. Eating ass is actually pretty common.
I would much rather stick my dick in it, but with an ass that size I doubt my dick would even reach in doggy style position lol. I would have to hit her from cow girl position lol.
 
Saying "only having sex with real women is legitimate" is just simp/cuck behaviour.
You realize that this elevation of women, even when it's under the pretence of "domination", is giving them more power of you, correct?
Once we have sex robots & artificial wombs, men will finally have uncompromising autonomy over human reproduction, in such a way that benefits the human civilization as a whole. No longer men will or have to cater to women, rather we'll return back to cater to the nuclear family that kept the human race in check since our dawn of time.
 
Saying "only having sex with real women is legitimate" is just simp/cuck behaviour.
Arguing against a strawman rather than simply quoting someone and arguing against what they literally said is simp/cuck behavior.

Who the hell said anything about "legitimacy" as if the act has to be validated by others?.

My point is that it won't be as enjoyable, I don't care about what other people think of the act. You must be an egoist and projecting hard if you start dreaming up words like "legitimate".

You know what's ironic?

Press CTRL+F on your keyboard and search the word "legit". On the two pages of this entire thread you are the FIRST PERSON to use the word legitimate or any variation of the word up until I responded just now. So you really are just projecting.

Next time argue against what people say rather than what you feel about what they're saying, the quote feature exists for a reason, so you don't have to make shit up.

You realize that this elevation of women, even when it's under the pretence of "domination", is giving them more power of you, correct?
No, the laws are what gives women power over you. In the past they had no say, now their voices and actions are backed by daddy government. That power exists whether you acknowledge it or not. As incels we can't give or take that power away.

Also that power only exists if you are targeting women in the West, which is exactly why I'm an advocate for wealthmaxxing and third-worldmaxxing.

Please understand that we won't get to experience this grand era of sex android technology, we have to think and operate in the real world. We'll both be long dead before the world even sees the beta testing model of a realistic sex android.

Once we have sex robots & artificial wombs, men will finally have uncompromising autonomy over human reproduction, in such a way that benefits the human civilization as a whole. No longer men will or have to cater to women, rather we'll return back to cater to the nuclear family that kept the human race in check since our dawn of time.
I actually agree with this. But in terms of sex it will never be as enjoyable as having a physical human woman submit to you. There's a psychological aspect to sex too, and you can't really live that out as a man without a woman present in body and mind. You can't dominate something that isn't even self aware and has the ability to truly say no or express emotions.

I'm sure you can simulate it enough to an extent that most men would not care by programming in facial responses on an android. But for some men it still won't be enjoyable because it's not genuine. Also that's like a century+ from now, facial expressions are hard to realistically simulate with robotics. Uncanny Valley would instantly kill your erection lol.

It's the same problem for women too, actually it's worse for them. For men sex can be just about pleasure because were not really emotional, so in our case we can still enjoy fucking a realistic sexbot a lot even without the feeling of dominance, but women won't even bother buying a male sexbot because there's no emotional aspect to it, it's pointless for them. This is why the sexbot market will be solely for men.

There won't be any Chadbots flooding the market because women want attention, validation, emotional connections, etc. You can't get that from something that doesn't really exist and isn't really conscious. Men really just want sex, but a great part of sex is the feeling of dominating a woman and having her submit to you. So even though we can still enjoy the sex part, we won't get the dominance part.
 
I've never really been into dominating women so sex wouldn't solve that problem for me. Also, you don't have to only masturbate to the act of sex, you can also masturbate to softcore porn, nothing at all etc. That being said, if sex is truly a problem and you are thinking about having it all the time 24/7, then yes you should probably hire a prostitute.
 
Last edited:
I'll still feel mogged raping a women she'd be comparing be to all the big dicks she's taken:feelstastyman: and didnt you say that women follow code like a robot, so validatation from them is meaningless, the same thing applies to raping them right:feelsseriously:
 
also your idea that just fucking a prostitute will fix all your problem is stupid, feminist support prostitution "sex work" etc, your essentially just paying for something that other men get for free, and playing by the rules of a system that enforces you to pay for sex, it'd be better just to be a neet taking pensions from taxpayers unironically
 
Coper at it again, you argue for escorts which is not the same as gf, but you don't cry about that
 

Similar threads

Narcicel's Oneitis
Replies
19
Views
486
edgelordcel
edgelordcel
screwthefbi
Replies
16
Views
314
screwthefbi
screwthefbi
broken & doomed
Replies
26
Views
812
Murdoch89
M
SlayerSlayer
Replies
29
Views
707
Buried Alive 2.0
Buried Alive 2.0

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top