Hey, adherers of racism and sexism, can you unpack this?

[NorthernWind]

'Associate professors Andrew Timming FCAHR and Chris Baumann, and senior professor of management Paul Gollan have found that appearance-based bias - known within the world of recruitment - also dictates whether or not employees will be listened to by their managers...

"[In our research] attractiveness is measured against a database of faces with some basic demographic information, then each face is rated by 2,600 other respondents on a scale," says Timming...Participants made of 289 managers, were shown the faces of people aged 20-30. Older faces were excluded as age is negatively correlated with attractiveness, according to the report.

Managers were then presented with scenarios like: "Imagine an employee walks into your office and makes a suggestion about how an operational process could be improved. How likely would you be to take their advice?". They were then shown two faces, one attractive and one less attractive, with a variety in gender and race.
Managers were then asked, on a scale of 1-7, how likely they'd be to act on employee's suggestion: 1 being not likely, 7 being extremely likely.

Surprisingly, female voices were listened to more than male voices, and there was no difference between white and non-white employees.
It was only when the introduction of an attractive variable was introduced that Timming and his team noticed a difference...

Interestingly, the gender of the managers played no part in their decision ; female and male managers were equally as likely to ignore less attractive employees."

Https://www.hrmonline.com.au/research/unattractive-people-ignored-work-research/

 

[Balding Subhuman]

Makes sense to me. But also something to note, men are seen as the unattractive gender. The average woman is seen as more attractive than the average man, therefore women are listened to more. Women are extremely entitled though so they don't get it.

And to be honest I see this everywhere. Feminism is something that is promoted all the time. Even when men have real grievances like suicide, addiction and homelessness, nobody cares about them. Because they aren't attractive. Male rights activism is seen as pointless, because the unattractive gender doesn't matter.

The only way for a woman to have the 'male experience' is for her to be extremely ugly. Then she'll get treated like a male.

All in all there's this feeling that ugly people feel all the time but can't put it into words. And the feeling is basically, that if you're born as ugly, you deserve less, whether its romance, companionship, good jobs, favors from people, respect. You matter less. Your needs aren't as important as the needs of attractive people. But you're not allowed to point this out in any way, because then it comes off as complaining, and you aren't supposed to complain about the hierarchy.

Basically only valuable genes are valuable. Your value is set by your looks, your genes. Ugly genes get thrown out, genes that come in an attractive package get preserved and they are worshipped by other people.

 

[NorthernWind]

Makes sense to me. But also something to note, men are seen as the unattractive gender. The average woman is seen as more attractive than the average man, therefore women are listened to more. Women are extremely entitled though so they don't get it.

And to be honest I see this everywhere. Feminism is something that is promoted all the time. Even when men have real grievances like suicide, addiction and homelessness, nobody cares about them. Because they aren't attractive. Male rights activism is seen as pointless, because the unattractive gender doesn't matter.

The only way for a woman to have the 'male experience' is for her to be extremely ugly. Then she'll get treated like a male.

All in all there's this feeling that ugly people feel all the time but can't put it into words. And the feeling is basically, that if you're born as ugly, you deserve less, whether its romance, companionship, good jobs, favors from people, respect. You matter less. Your needs aren't as important as the needs of attractive people. But you're not allowed to point this out in any way, because then it comes off as complaining, and you aren't supposed to complain about the hierarchy.

Basically only valuable genes are valuable. Your value is set by your looks, your genes. Ugly genes get thrown out, genes that come in an attractive package get preserved and they are worshipped by other people.

If you're ugly, then you are treated like complete vermin and you most gladly accept the abuse ( according to normgroids ).
At best you're destined to serve genetically superior. I wouldn't even call this existence 'life'. It's anti-life.

 

[Nagger]

But also something to note, men are seen as the unattractive gender