As someone who deeply studied history, nothing has annoyed me more than holocaust denial. From whichever perspective one examines it, holocaust denial is stupid, irrational, and quite frankly, ideologically contradictory. If one is serious about National Socialism, they should argue in favor of that ideology, one tenant of which is racial Darwinism, and the outright rejection of Abrahamic slave morality. Assuming the Nazi's stayed true to their own ideology, there would be no reason for them to simply house the Jewish population, rather than exterminate them. When a Nazi denies the holocaust, he is unknowingly adhering to Classical Liberal ideology, they are confessing that the idea of unjustified killing of racial opponents is immoral, and seeking moral superiority through victimhood of a global conspiracy. How childish, I would expect such tactics from the Marxists, yet we see it more-so on the Far-Right. If historical facts get in the way of your ideological support, then pick a different ideology or seriously reconsider your moral framework.
We could talk all day about the evidence, but this horse has already been beat into ashes. The Nazis' own paperwork aligned almost perfectly with the estimations, both from Western-Allied sources and Soviet investigators. Nazis themselves admitted to the crimes, Nazi officials who were tortured espoused stories that perfectly coincided with those who weren't. Survivor testimony and camp evidence, along with census data from an array of independent sources can all be amalgamated to verify and document the holocaust. It happened. Holocaust Deniers often point to a few mishaps in the remembered details of survivors, such as accusations that the bodies were blue (when Zkylon B makes them turn red). These are very childish arguments, with any historical event, there's going to be some faulty memories, especially when trauma is involved. If these arguments were to be taken seriously then nearly any historical event could be deemed fake on a few accounts of inaccurate witnesses. Any criminal lawyer will tell you that.
I'm not against Incels arguing for National Socialism, I believe we should foster an open dialog where ideological duel is encouraged, but we have to stick to the facts, for without which we will descend onto the level of the freaks at IncelTears. I love you all so I mean this with the most noble intentions, so with all due respect, grow the fuck up.
We could talk all day about the evidence, but this horse has already been beat into ashes. The Nazis' own paperwork aligned almost perfectly with the estimations, both from Western-Allied sources and Soviet investigators. Nazis themselves admitted to the crimes, Nazi officials who were tortured espoused stories that perfectly coincided with those who weren't. Survivor testimony and camp evidence, along with census data from an array of independent sources can all be amalgamated to verify and document the holocaust. It happened. Holocaust Deniers often point to a few mishaps in the remembered details of survivors, such as accusations that the bodies were blue (when Zkylon B makes them turn red). These are very childish arguments, with any historical event, there's going to be some faulty memories, especially when trauma is involved. If these arguments were to be taken seriously then nearly any historical event could be deemed fake on a few accounts of inaccurate witnesses. Any criminal lawyer will tell you that.
I'm not against Incels arguing for National Socialism, I believe we should foster an open dialog where ideological duel is encouraged, but we have to stick to the facts, for without which we will descend onto the level of the freaks at IncelTears. I love you all so I mean this with the most noble intentions, so with all due respect, grow the fuck up.
Last edited:
