Human Benchmark
Take the test multiple times, the first try will almost always be terrible.
Experiment How good at FPS games are you? Human Benchmark aim test.
Take the test multiple times, the first try will almost always be terrible.
@incelsbruh
did it 4 times, average 547
Holy fuck. What games do you play?
All kinds of games.
Why? Is it too slow?
over 4 snailcels
~440ms
I got one billion, I’m good at FPS gamesHuman Benchmark
humanbenchmark.com
Take the test multiple times, the first try will almost always be terrible.
This site always blackpills you in ways you don't even expect.
i get like 400. i used to play fps games a lot but they're just boring to me now tbh. i was on the level of my friends before but they're sweaty niggas now that have hundreds of hours on aim trainer, osu, etc.
I knew my wrists were absolute trash.
That's where the whole bot thing started - I was getting wrist pain when I tried postmaxxing by hand.
I got 611 so far, but my mouse isn't really set up for competitive FPS anymore
dropped sensitivity now I'm down to 559ms, was overshooting target
Last edited:
It's fucking addicting in a group ngl
Me and a few buddies did that to improve our CSGO skills
it varies. it does not matter. in war some are medics and snipers too.
I usually score between 630 and 680.
550 to 640
Always around 500
591 jfl i suck at many fps games in reaction times and shit
i only get lucky in flicking sometimes to people's heads
i only get lucky in flicking sometimes to people's heads
675 
it's why i don't play FPS games anymore, I am 40, the reflexes are too slow
it's why i don't play FPS games anymore, I am 40, the reflexes are too slow
T
literal corpse tier
respect
I
That's good right?
never tried this test before. i got 390ms first try. 320 second try.
i'm good at fps games, it's one of the few things i can actually do well in life.
i'm good at fps games, it's one of the few things i can actually do well in life.
Wait which is better, higher or lower?
729
B
Average around 425 from ~15 tries.
In-game you're going to have faster reaction times anyway from factoring other things like map knowledge, sound, common peek spots, and overall game sense. You can react to one footstep immediately and spin your crosshair to start shooting. The aim trainer is completely randomized, so I don't think it's an ideal measure. It is still useful, though.
In-game you're going to have faster reaction times anyway from factoring other things like map knowledge, sound, common peek spots, and overall game sense. You can react to one footstep immediately and spin your crosshair to start shooting. The aim trainer is completely randomized, so I don't think it's an ideal measure. It is still useful, though.
high iq, also i always pre-fire anticipating or when rushing in common strafe spots
729
based. chads can have 1000 ms still get laid.
B
It's a good idea to usually pre-fire common spots. I remember watching a video where n0thing was counting the exact seconds on cache when a CT would rush and peek the entrance of A main and one-tapped him. It was pretty impressive how he read the situation.
lower is better
And here I thought sub 350 was subhuman, guess I'm good for something afterall
Similar threads
Brutal
People like this exist but we are supposed to believe that genes and inborn talents don't matter
- WorthlessSlavicShit
- The Lounge
mlcurrycel
Users who are viewing this thread
