Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Discussion how many of you are standardscels?

would you ascend with a girl with little to no attractive features?


  • Total voters
    37
subhuman

subhuman

Fuck it, we ball
★★★★★
Joined
Apr 9, 2022
Posts
11,532
would you ascend with a girl who has almost nothing attractive about her if she was super into you? or would you hold off and see if you can be hypergamous and get a staceylite or becky?
 
report anyone who votes for no. you cannot decline pussy and claim your involuntarily celibate:feelskek::feelskek::feelskek::feelskek:
 
would you ascend with a girl who has almost nothing attractive about her if she was super into you? or would you hold off and see if you can be hypergamous and get a staceylite or becky?

yes, but most women are extremely boring, it's almost impossible to fall in love just by their "personalities" (At least in my case) they are boring as fuck, but also deceitful in many ways,
 
If you said no: volcel :banhammer:
 
If you want to stick your dick in anything why not the blender?! :feelskek::feelskek::feelskek:
 
I got rejected by a girl I looked better then
 
I wonder how many of you would suddenly be volcel, if a morbidly obese physically deformed foid with a tumour covering her face said she liked you.

Normie 5/10 that mogs us is probably already married to her but still. :feelsclown:
 
Everyone is standardcel to some extent
 
The plainer the better in my opinion. Less chance of her cheating on me with chad maybe later because chad won’t be interested. Maybe.
 
I've asked out fat women and hoodrats before. Still no luck.
 
report anyone who votes for no. you cannot decline pussy and claim your involuntarily celibate:feelskek::feelskek::feelskek::feelskek:
If you said no: volcel :banhammer:
So you would gymmax, careermax, money max, and NTmax for an ugly woman you have zero sexual attraction for and has a high likelihood of cucking you? :feelsugh: Fucking shameless gynocentric cucks.
1650058650936
 
Volcel if you wouldn't. I'd rather be unhappy with an ugly toilet than suicidal alone. :cryfeels::blackpill:
 
So you would gymmax, careermax, money max, and NTmax for an ugly woman you have zero sexual attraction for and has a high likelihood of cucking you? :feelsugh: Fucking shameless gynocentric cucks.
View attachment 600698

"Don't be a landwhale", man that standard is antiquated. As landwhales are becoming more common it's not uncommon to see Chad's and especially Chadlite's with them. :feelswhat:

Remember that once Chad dates down all toilets' standards go up.
 
If she had no STDs and wasn't morbidly obese, sure.
 
better incel than settle for garbage
 
If you're already incel after trying with ugly girls for 27 years, what's another 10-20 years to find someone you have at least a modicum of attraction to. At this point, I'd rather just wait for someone I'm into. No grannies or landwhales for me, please
 
would you ascend with a girl who has almost nothing attractive about her if she was super into you?
Not even a question for me but she doesn't exist.
Wanting someone who gives a shit about you, might count as having "high standards" though. :feelscry:
 
Last edited:
report anyone who votes for no. you cannot decline pussy and claim your involuntarily celibate:feelskek::feelskek::feelskek::feelskek:
The pussy has to be attached to something that resembles a human female otherwise you might as well just fuck a fleshlight
 
I only dislike fat women.I would date single mothers and whores who had 100 dicks in them,that's how low i can go.
 

Similar threads

TheMonk
Replies
43
Views
648
Dominion
Dominion
U
Replies
34
Views
467
Misogynist Vegeta
Misogynist Vegeta
P
Replies
16
Views
473
Cayden Zhang
Cayden Zhang
Shrek
Replies
19
Views
553
Hikikomori_cel
Hikikomori_cel
Mistake
Replies
9
Views
396
Autistic Uggo
Autistic Uggo

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top