SuicideFuel How the fuck is economic socialism more popular than sexual socialism?

[nvrbegan]

The argumemt for economic socialism is: Society needs redistribution to work. It's not fair that people who mostly didn't do anything except being born in the right family have so much more money than others. Therefore an economically poor person is entitled to other people's money.

However, being economically poor is a much better fate than being sexually poor.
You don't need much to be happy.
A loyal gf and food on the table is all you need to be more happy than a millionaire incel.

Therefore, the argument for sexual socialism (i.e., the redistribution of pussy) is much more powerful than economic socialism.
Imagine a leftist saying to a person he DESERVES to be poor because he's genetically a failure or TO WORK HARDER. But this is exactly what they tell incels.

If being sexually poor is a so much harder fate than being economically poor, why are there no sexual socialists everywhere? I think there are and traditionalists/right-wingers are exactly this - sexual socialists. And they are fought to the blood by economic socialists.
Shows that leftism, once again is simply a mental illness, they can't grasp what priorities should be, they're just pretending. Their "equality" is an illusion.
I DON'T WANT MONEY, I WANT A GF!

 

[LeFrenchCel]

I can't stand how people can be pro-socialist economically speaking but liberal af when it comes to sex, this is just a lack of mental coherency.

Either you support socialism in both markets, either you support socialism in any.

 

[Lonelyus]

The argumemt for economic socialism is: Society needs redistribution to work. It's not fair that people who mostly didn't do anything except being born in the right family have so much more money than others. Therefore an economically poor person is entitled to other people's money.

However, being economically poor is a much better fate than being sexually poor.
You don't need much to be happy.
A loyal gf and food on the table is all you need to be more happy than a millionaire incel.

Therefore, the argument for sexual socialism (i.e., the redistribution of pussy) is much more powerful than economic socialism.
Imagine a leftist saying to a person he DESERVES to be poor because he's genetically a failure or TO WORK HARDER. But this is exactly what they tell incels.

If being sexually poor is a so much harder fate than being economically poor, why are there no sexual socialists everywhere? I think there are and traditionalists/right-wingers are exactly this - sexual socialists. And they are fought to the blood by economic socialists.
Shows that leftism, once again is simply a mental illness, they can't grasp what priorities should be, they're just pretending. Their "equality" is an illusion.
I DON'T WANT MONEY, I WANT A GF!

Stopped reading at, "You dont need to be happy"

 

[FrothySolutions]

Because an argument can be made that your money is not really "your" money. But your genitals will always be your genitals. You can't force someone to have sex with anyone.

 

[Spooky_Heejin]

Because an argument can be made that your money is not really "your" money. But your genitals will always be your genitals. You can't force someone to have sex with anyone.

 

[AngryUbermensch]

I agree that sexual socialism is more important than economic BUT tradionalists are as far from sexual socialism as it can get. Prearrenged marriage is NOT sexual socialism. Your wife will become old after 10 years and you will be incel again. Real sexual socialism is free state sponsored prostitution.