[Cope] "Human biodiversity isn't real, bro"

Bad Personality

Bad Personality

Truecel
★★
Joined
Jul 24, 2020
Posts
129
Online
12d 13h 12m
"We're not wild animals, bro"
"There's only one race, the human race, bro"

Chimpanzee and Bonobo:
20201121_001334.jpg


Jaguar and Leopard:
20201121_001345.jpg


Two human beings:
20201121_001320.jpg

Daily reminder that Sminem and Jeremy Meeks are the same species.


"Oh but they're a different race, they're obviously gonna look different, bro"

Well this thread is for you: https://incels.co/threads/the-guys-i-like-vs-the-guys-that-like-me.258313/

Screenshot_20201121-001706_Instagram.jpg
 
Last edited:
Numb

Numb

Woman is father of the Gene.
★★★★★
Joined
May 16, 2019
Posts
11,517
Online
26d 9h 28m
rip my boy sminem
 
Irredeemable

Irredeemable

Warlock
★★★★★
Joined
Dec 10, 2019
Posts
6,814
Online
111d 23h 47m
Brutal slavpill
@Speedloader @Saudade
 
slavcel11

slavcel11

Commander
★★★
Joined
Apr 16, 2020
Posts
3,229
Online
53d 21h 40m
gosh there's no ugly or beautiful people inkwell:soy::soy::soy::soy:

beauty is in the eye of the beholder :soy::soy::soy::soy:
 
THE TRUE HONKLER

THE TRUE HONKLER

Wait 'till they get a load of me
★★★★
Joined
Oct 14, 2020
Posts
2,348
Online
8d 18h 4m
"There's one one hyuman race bro, science says so bro"
The say human race, but by ''race'' they mean species.
They are quick enough to shit on white oppression, creepy currys and blacks being oppressed; they realise there isn't one fucking race jfl
 
Idlevillagercel

Idlevillagercel

Detached
★★★★★
Joined
Nov 4, 2020
Posts
990
Online
10d 21h 4m
The say human race, but by ''race'' they mean species.
They are quick enough to shit on white oppression, creepy currys and blacks being oppressed; they realise there isn't one fucking race jfl
Yeah but they also say that races are a social construct and that "scientifically" races don't exist. They say a lot of contradictory bullshit you know
 
THE TRUE HONKLER

THE TRUE HONKLER

Wait 'till they get a load of me
★★★★
Joined
Oct 14, 2020
Posts
2,348
Online
8d 18h 4m
Yeah but they also say that races are a social construct and that "scientifically" races don't exist. They say a lot of contradictory bullshit you know
their actions tell me they believe in multiple races even if what they is contradictory
 
Idlevillagercel

Idlevillagercel

Detached
★★★★★
Joined
Nov 4, 2020
Posts
990
Online
10d 21h 4m
their actions tell me they believe in multiple races even if what they is contradictory
Just like they also believe that iq differs from race to race but they'll never admit it openly
 
Fat Link

Fat Link

The Holy Emissary of Sacred Wizchan™
Joined
Jul 31, 2019
Posts
4,549
Online
81d 10h 14m
OMG raycissssst!:soy::soy::soy::soy::soy:
 
Dirlewanger

Dirlewanger

SS-Obergruppenführer
★★★
Joined
Aug 27, 2018
Posts
250
Online
1d 1h 19m
All you need to do to prove HBD is look at the actions of various racial groups, it’s fairly self evident which is why it takes gigantic media and social engineering projects to get people to pretend it doesn’t exist.
 

Attachments

Tenshi

Tenshi

もういいよ
★★★★★
Joined
May 21, 2020
Posts
5,801
Online
46d 1h 26m
not even the most marxistic jewish fags say that bro
depends on how you interpret the concept of race, which is mainly a non-scientific concept used socially to identify people who are phenotypically different. Humans have very little genetic diversity among eachother compared to other species, not enough to be considered a subspecies. In fact, we're weirdly close genetically in a way we weren't supposed to due to our species span on earth.


kek

not a good comparison at all, human races should be compared to dog breeds instead not canine species. Dogs also have very little genetic diversity among them, but slightly more than humans. Also never wondered why animals who have been domesticated by humans, just like us, have a greater range of phenotypes?
 
kikecel

kikecel

Deaf and blind and dumb and born to follow
★★★
Joined
Sep 10, 2018
Posts
3,769
Online
29d 5h 48m
just meeksmaxx bro
 
Greyjediincel

Greyjediincel

Recruit
★★★
Joined
Nov 14, 2020
Posts
256
Online
3d 10h 24m
depends on how you interpret the concept of race, which is mainly a non-scientific concept used socially to identify people who are phenotypically different. Humans have very little genetic diversity among eachother compared to other species, not enough to be considered a subspecies. In fact, we're weirdly close genetically in a way we weren't supposed to due to our species span on earth
None of that is true.
 
Tenshi

Tenshi

もういいよ
★★★★★
Joined
May 21, 2020
Posts
5,801
Online
46d 1h 26m
None of that is true.
.

Perhaps the most widely cited statistic about human genetic diversity is that any two humans differ, on average, at about 1 in 1,000 DNA base pairs (0.1%). Human genetic diversity is substantially lower than that of many other species, including our nearest evolutionary relative, the chimpanzee. Genetic diversity is a function of a population's "age" (i.e., the amount of time during which mutations accumulate to generate diversity) and its size. Our genetic homogeneity implies that anatomically modern humans arose relatively recently (perhaps 200,000 years ago) and that our population size was quite small at one time (perhaps 10,000 breeding individuals). To put the 0.1% genetic diversity estimate into perspective, it is useful to remember that humans have approximately 3 billion base pairs in a haploid cell. Thus, any pair of humans differs by approximately 3 million base pairs. These differences contain much useful information about the evolutionary history of our species. In addition, the small proportion of differences that occur within genes can lead to critical inferences about the effects of natural selection.
Human populations can be defined along geographic, political, linguistic, religious, or ethnic boundaries. Using a common definition that groups populations into major continents (Africa, Asia, Europe, and North and South America), many studies have shown that approximately 90% of genetic variation can be found within these populations, and only about 10% of genetic variation separates the populations. Thus, the great majority of genetic differences can be found between individuals from any one of the major continents, and, on average, only a small proportion of additional differences will be found between individuals from two different continents. Furthermore, because human history is a history of population movement, and because humans are extraordinarily adept at sharing their DNA, the genetic boundaries between populations are typically indistinct. For any given DNA sequence or gene, two individuals from different populations are sometimes more similar to one another than are two individuals from the same population. The fact that humans are relatively homogeneous at the DNA level, combined with the fact that between-population variation is modest, has significant social implications. Importantly, these patterns imply that the DNA differences between individuals, and between populations, are relatively scant and do not provide a biological basis for any form of discrimination.
such small genetic diversity is so impressive that scientists theorise our species problably went through a genetic bottleneck:


Most variation we have between races are basically superficial, phenotypical differences like hair texture, skin color (also a few genes related to how prone some individuals are to certain diseases and things like the ability to digest lactose, gluten and etc).

Also something we should notice is that among humans, africans have the most genetic diversity even though they're supposedly look all the same. So let's say a Bantu person may be more close, genetically, to a white person or an asian than let's say a khoisan person
 
Dirlewanger

Dirlewanger

SS-Obergruppenführer
★★★
Joined
Aug 27, 2018
Posts
250
Online
1d 1h 19m
.





such small genetic diversity is so impressive that scientists theorise our species problably went through a genetic bottleneck:


Most variation we have between races are basically superficial, phenotypical differences like hair texture, skin color (also a few genes related to how prone some individuals are to certain diseases and things like the ability to digest lactose, gluten and etc).

Also something we should notice is that among humans, africans have the most genetic diversity even though they're supposedly look all the same. So let's say a Bantu person may be more close, genetically, to a white person or an asian than let's say a khoisan person
Nice try, Shlomo

 
Tenshi

Tenshi

もういいよ
★★★★★
Joined
May 21, 2020
Posts
5,801
Online
46d 1h 26m
sure, this wikipedia article about a critique paper made by someone who also agree with the scientific consensus and is simply discussing and criticising whether taxonomical classifications should be applied to humans rather than any evidence presented beforehand is refuting what I said?

you didn't really read what you just posted, right?

Got 'em

Still can't believe that debunked nonsense is being peddled. The fact that one study from the 70's is the mainstream view tells you all you need to know about normie science worship.
He got me cuz he called me a jew jfl at these altrightfags

keep coping and strawmanning, you both don't know what are you talking about. Where did you get this information? I can link you many studies pointing out this FACT

 
solblue

solblue

Overlord
★★★
Joined
Dec 9, 2017
Posts
5,258
Online
84d 5h 48m
Differences among dog breeds account for greater genetic variation than they do between human races. Here's a source for dog and the results for humans are in that wiki article posted above. The "Lewontin fallacy" is concerning his conclusions, but his numbers aren't in question there. Also, the fst between domestic dogs and wolves is far higher than it is within different human races and domestic dog breeds. Western Europeans, Nigerians, and East Asians, whom you reference in your pic, also have lower fst values between them than the differences between dog breeds on average. The numbers just don't support the idea in the meme
 
Greyjediincel

Greyjediincel

Recruit
★★★
Joined
Nov 14, 2020
Posts
256
Online
3d 10h 24m
sure, this wikipedia article about a critique paper made by someone who also agree with the scientific consensus and is simply discussing and criticising whether taxonomical classifications should be applied to humans rather than any evidence presented beforehand is refuting what I said?

you didn't really read what you just posted, right?


He got me cuz he called me a jew jfl at these altrightfags

keep coping and strawmanning, you both don't know what are you talking about. Where did you get this information? I can link you many studies pointing out this FACT

Africans aren't common ancestors with Neanderthals, they have an entirely different admixture with different hominids.

And I'm not alt-right. I support rights for all sentient creatures, including apes and dolphins, to an extent.

But we will never be able to achieve harmony unless we integrate the fact that a group that didn't have the wheel when Asians and Caucasians were building castles and sailing around the world may require different policies or solutions in their communities than others.

Yes, Asians and Whites are very similar, but Africans can't even eat a Western diet without dying of heart failure at 50. Come on.
 
SubhumanAbomination

SubhumanAbomination

.
★★★
Joined
Jul 9, 2020
Posts
209
Online
3d 17h 3m
ITT : an elementary schooler's knowledge about biology and history



It looks like the theory that ugly people are more retarded might be correct
 
Tenshi

Tenshi

もういいよ
★★★★★
Joined
May 21, 2020
Posts
5,801
Online
46d 1h 26m
Africans aren't common ancestors with Neanderthals, they have an entirely different admixture with different hominids.

And I'm not alt-right. I support rights for all sentient creatures, including apes and dolphins, to an extent.

But we will never be able to achieve harmony unless we integrate the fact that a group that didn't have the wheel when Asians and Caucasians were building castles and sailing around the world may require different policies or solutions in their communities than others.

Yes, Asians and Whites are very similar, but Africans can't even eat a Western diet without dying of heart failure at 50. Come on.
that's just not how it works

all humans share a common ancestor with neanderthals because they are our closest relatives, if they weren't extinct. They evolved in europe from heidelbergensis populations, while we evolved from the same species but in africa. Humans did interbred with neanderthals as far as we know in europe, north africa and asia, and many individuals today carry a small percentage of their DNA but then again what's the point?

What science says is that we as species have very little genetic diversity in our gene pool for some reason, not that we don't have any which would be a stupid claim. But do we have enough to be considered different races? It depends on how you see. If race = subspecies like we classify bonobos/chimps? Then no. If race = a mere social concept used to classify different populations based on their phenos, then yes.

But we will never be able to achieve harmony unless we integrate the fact that a group that didn't have the wheel when Asians and Caucasians were building castles and sailing around the world may require different policies or solutions in their communities than others.
what does that have to do with anything we're discussing?

as for diet, one of the few divergences we humans have are indeed related to the ability to process food and some mutations related to predisposition to some cronic diseases, however if we're going to judge only on this regard we could say africans and asians would be much more similar, since they are on average much more intolerant to some diets than europeans (like lactose intolerance with is high in asia and africa but not so much in europe) but anyways
 
Greyjediincel

Greyjediincel

Recruit
★★★
Joined
Nov 14, 2020
Posts
256
Online
3d 10h 24m
that's just not how it works
:soy::soy::soy::soy::soy:

The amount of DNA is irrelevant. The part that is different is significant, and anyone that's spent time around different races can see that.
 
Copexodius Maximus

Copexodius Maximus

Truest of the true kikecels
★★★★★
Joined
Jul 21, 2020
Posts
9,254
Online
31d 7h 25m
There's actually 3 human races: Chad, Normie, and foid.

Incels arent human, we are subhuman.
 

Similar threads