lightskin2thousand0
its completely Over --- sub 5 male --- TFL
★★★
- Joined
- Sep 2, 2019
- Posts
- 4,136
post
The tigers probably won most of the time
Because the "Indians" from 1000 years ago were Indo-Aryans and not subhuman shitskins.
Lmao.The tigers probably won most of the time
From non Homo Sapien hominids.Where did shitskins come from?
whites and north east asian are the ones with non homo sapien genetics (neanderthals and Denisovans) pure homo sapiens are pitch black africansFrom non Homo Sapien hominids.
Shitskin nigger cope. Pitch black Africans are Homo Erectuswhites and north east asian are the ones with non homo sapien genetics (neanderthals and Denisovans) pure homo sapiens are pitch black africans
Invents mehow did they have guns 1000 years ago dumb dumb nigga
It was a golden age for Tiger Chads who lived fat on the easily huntable curries.Do you mean fire powder? Also, were tigers that much of a problem in India 1k years ago? I would have assumed they would have had the tiger population under control like 3k years ago
People forget just how small a percentage of the male population could be professional soldiers or warriors in preindustrial society. Feeding, arming, housing, moving armies takes a great deal of civilian labor and infrastructure even today. Even conscripts were at a premium and had to go back home for harvesting season.Because of the caste system.