Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

If Russia was always anti-Western....

NorthernWind

NorthernWind

Paragon
★★★★★
Joined
Feb 13, 2021
Posts
15,295
then why Russian president Yeltsin said in 1994 that Russia needs to be the first [former communist] country which should join NATO?
Even Putin in 2000 wanted to join NATO if I'm not mistaken.
The West ( US and UK at least ) ignored Russia and then took all former territories which were in the Soviet sphere of influence.
When Americans wonder why Russia is anti-NATO.
 
then why Russian president Yeltsin said in 1994 that Russia needs to be the first [former communist] country which should join NATO?
He was a traitorous globohomo loving soy. Yeltsin and Gorbachev aspired to be vassals of jewish globalist Weimerica like how Zelensky and the Baltic states are today.
 
NATO has to have enemies. If everyone is in NATO, nobody is.
 
NATO has to have enemies. If everyone is in NATO, nobody is.
NATO should be irrelevant now because its only purpose was to challenge the Soviet Union. Now it’s just used as leverage if a country joins they have to push agendas like globohomo on their populist
 
NATO should be irrelevant now because its only purpose was to challenge the Soviet Union. Now it’s just used as leverage if a country joins they have to push agendas like globohomo on their populist
courtiers that are part of NATO are safe from "Special Military Operation"
 
He was a traitorous globohomo loving soy. Yeltsin and Gorbachev aspired to be vassals of jewish globalist Weimerica like how Zelensky and the Baltic states are today.
Yeltsin wasn't a vassal of America. Many Russians dislike Yeltsin because he helped to destroy Soviet Union and time of his presidency was the time of economic disaster in Russia. And he acted like a drunkard.
But he wasn't vassal of the West.
He just naively believed that Westerners want to see Russia as an equal partner.
 
WIth Russia China would be too easy tbh.
You think nato could beat china and Russia easily? Idk America’s military is soy and recruit is low. They’re struggling to fill the ranks.
 
You think nato could beat china and Russia easily? Idk America’s military is soy and recruit is low. They’re struggling to fill the ranks.
NATO + Russia (as a NATO member) against China
 
courtiers that are part of NATO are safe from "Special Military Operation"
I wouldn't be on this forum if a 'special military operation' commenced without NATO. Woud love to be killed by ruskis.
 
Yeltsin wasn't a vassal of America.
He aspired to bring Western neoliberal style of democracy to Russia. He wanted Russia to be accepted by globalists, which practically meant giving up sovereignty.
 
You think nato could beat china and Russia easily? Idk America’s military is soy and recruit is low. They’re struggling to fill the ranks.
Russia is in close proximity with China. So JewSA could just set up a fuck ton of military bases near the border and keep everything under control.
 
NATO + Russia (as a NATO member) against China
You can beat Chinese Army but it's extremely hard to establish control over the whole territory of China with more than 1 billion population.
Some part of Chinese would wage guerrilla was against NATO armies so in the end NATO would be forced to leave China ( at least central China ).
 
You can beat Chinese Army but it's extremely hard to establish control over the whole territory of China with more than 1 billion population.
Some part of Chinese would wage guerrilla was against NATO armies so in the end NATO would be forced to leave China ( at least central China ).
you could just install a pro-Western Kuomintang government.
 
He aspired to bring Western neoliberal style of democracy to Russia. He wanted Russia to be accepted by globalists, which practically meant giving up sovereignty.
He later became more anti-Western.

Df1uvq3 7f19370a 3e94 4c95 aa6f 0b1bfe3f96a2
 
you could just install a pro-Western Kuomintang government.
The reason is why Kuomintang in Taiwan was pro-Western because they were too small and their security depended on the West.
But if they had control over a huge country, their stance on geopolitics probably would be very different.
Chinese nationalists are in fact more dangerous than communists because they have territorial pretensions.
 
Russian politicans openly talk about nuking the west and they bomb white people in Ukraine and replace them with Chinks. Sounds pretty anti-western and anti-white to me. All white countries like Finnland and Sweden flock to NATO for a reason.
 
The reason is why Kuomintang in Taiwan was pro-Western because they were too small and their security depended on the West.
But if they had control over a huge country, their stance on geopolitics probably would be very different.
Chinese nationalists are in fact more dangerous than communists because they have territorial pretensions.
CCP is also nationalist,Han nationalists, this whole pseudo-communist facade is just a cover-up.
 
It was a bluff. They didn't actually want to join NATO.
 
Russian politicans openly talk about nuking the west and they bomb white people in Ukraine and replace them with Chinks. Sounds pretty anti-western and anti-white to me. All white countries like Finnland and Sweden flock to NATO for a reason.
Are you naive? Modern Western states don't care about 'whiteness', that's why they import millions of migrants.
Even leading politicians in some Western countries aren't White.
NATO doesn't even protect Western civilization because they have Turkey with them.
 
Russian politicans openly talk about nuking the west and they bomb white people in Ukraine and replace them with Chinks. Sounds pretty anti-western and anti-white to me. All white countries like Finnland and Sweden flock to NATO for a reason.
Also NATO bombed white Christian Serbians solidarising with Muslims.
 
You can beat Chinese Army but it's extremely hard to establish control over the whole territory of China with more than 1 billion population.
Some part of Chinese would wage guerrilla was against NATO armies so in the end NATO would be forced to leave China ( at least central China ).
Why are people unironically this brain-damaged? If America refuses to fight a proper war, it doesn't mean that a proper war is impossible. These insurgencies only ever existed because the Americans refused to kill its enemies and sell women as slaves. The Germans and the Japs were dealing with insurgencies perfectly fine - look at Poland or Manchuria. (Japan did have difficulties in China, but mostly due to zero infrastructure for industrial war, not bandit gangster partisans lmaoo)
 
NATO has to have enemies. If everyone is in NATO, nobody is.
NATO has been expanding Eastwards, even after that ´deal´, where they have sworn to Never Expand
 
then why Russian president Yeltsin said in 1994 that Russia needs to be the first [former communist] country which should join NATO?
Even Putin in 2000 wanted to join NATO if I'm not mistaken.
The West ( US and UK at least ) ignored Russia and then took all former territories which were in the Soviet sphere of influence.
When Americans wonder why Russia is anti-NATO.
No way! Not the Russian girls Nato is a big threat
 

Similar threads

shii410
Replies
12
Views
694
NorthernWind
NorthernWind
lifefuel
Replies
14
Views
732
Cybersex is our hope
Cybersex is our hope
Eremetic
Replies
3
Views
533
Awake
Awake
N
Replies
2
Views
356
Julaybib
Julaybib
lonelysince2006
Replies
39
Views
2K
Julaybib
Julaybib

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top