Stolen from Reddit.
Monogamy was a gift to genetically inferior men that allowed them to reproduce by acquiring resources despite being genetically unfit. This in turn "watered down" the human race as a whole and is leading to the growing disparity in sexual success between the top and bottom tier men. Ask yourselves, what percentage of men today have the genetic potential (tall, broad shoulders, ability to put on muscle...etc.) to be good hunters/soldiers? 10%? 20%?
Well back in the pre-civil action era nearly all men (Neanderthals) were expected to do so. Hell there are more recent examples of this if you look at American Indian tribes that were conquered by Europeans in North America. Most of these openly practiced non-monogamy, so generally speaking, the best fighters and hunters would be the most sexually successful because of their genetic fitness:
https://daily.jstor.org/polygamy-native-societies-and-spanish-colonists/#:~:text=Having%20more%20than%20one%20wife.tried%20to%20end%20the%20practice.
My point is that prior to monogamy not all men got to reproduce because nature didn't allow them to. Once humans started to meddle with the natural order of things, genetically unfit men started to be created in droves and to punish humans for their hubris the incel was created. In a way the incel is an abomination of nature, something that was never supposed to exist in the first place.
Most of these complain about not being able to get laid, but the truth is that their fathers should have never been able to find a wife in the first place. Dating apps like tinder that are making dating more competitive are actually just returning society back to its original competitive state.
Instead of being frustrated that they can't/won't reproduce, these men should be grateful that they were born at all.
Monogamy was a gift to genetically inferior men that allowed them to reproduce by acquiring resources despite being genetically unfit. This in turn "watered down" the human race as a whole and is leading to the growing disparity in sexual success between the top and bottom tier men. Ask yourselves, what percentage of men today have the genetic potential (tall, broad shoulders, ability to put on muscle...etc.) to be good hunters/soldiers? 10%? 20%?
Well back in the pre-civil action era nearly all men (Neanderthals) were expected to do so. Hell there are more recent examples of this if you look at American Indian tribes that were conquered by Europeans in North America. Most of these openly practiced non-monogamy, so generally speaking, the best fighters and hunters would be the most sexually successful because of their genetic fitness:
https://daily.jstor.org/polygamy-native-societies-and-spanish-colonists/#:~:text=Having%20more%20than%20one%20wife.tried%20to%20end%20the%20practice.
My point is that prior to monogamy not all men got to reproduce because nature didn't allow them to. Once humans started to meddle with the natural order of things, genetically unfit men started to be created in droves and to punish humans for their hubris the incel was created. In a way the incel is an abomination of nature, something that was never supposed to exist in the first place.
Most of these complain about not being able to get laid, but the truth is that their fathers should have never been able to find a wife in the first place. Dating apps like tinder that are making dating more competitive are actually just returning society back to its original competitive state.
Instead of being frustrated that they can't/won't reproduce, these men should be grateful that they were born at all.
