Wow. Such an incredible proposition. I haven't thought about that.
First of all, whore: tall men have more reproductive success. Tall men have more sex partners and father more children than their shorter counterparts. That means shorter men are at a clear disadvantage when it comes to sexual and romantic relationships.
As if it wasn't enough: attractive people are more desirable in romantic and sexual relationships.
Stronger and muscular bodies also account for most of the variance in bodily attractiveness.
All of these traits are genetic. The only reason our parents managed to reproduce is because they lived in a different generation where people had no access to the internet. Women could not choose their partners on dating apps and social media; they had to settle for what was available in their geographic location.
But that doesn't mean all short men, ugly men and physically weaker men reproduced. No, no. A portion of them did not. They were at a clear disadvantage back then. They are at a clear disadvantage now, you stupid whore.
Also, have you ever heard of genetic recombination? Some ugly men are born in attractive families either because they have a disease or because they inherited the bad genes of the family. That happens more often than you think.
Last edited:
