Marrying for "love" only works out for a few

[DryDick]

Most people who marry for love are not built for it long term. It requires you to settle your differences, have empathy for your partners needs, to have patience, to have a desire to want a special bond. Most people are not built for it. More men than women are built for it, however. Women are less likely to be stable monogamously in the long run. Most women are closer to the slut archetype than the innocent angel.
Most marriages have always been betabuxx or arranged situations where the woman cannot afford to leave. It takes a special kind of woman to want to stick by her man's side (a non-chad) for the rest of her life without cheating.
Of course, genetics and upbringing play a huge role. If your parents had a happy loving marriage then you are likely to have one too. If your parents were always fighting and bickering then your marriage is probably going to be like that as well.

 

[PLA1092]

"Love" first requires physical attraction, especially in regards to the average foid; you cannot marry for some sort of everlasting feeling of connection if not a HTN or above, seeing the current state of hypergamy, discrimination towards subhumans, and foid privilege...

Indeed, the most common form of marriage is some sort of betabuxxing; though the quality of such a relationship can certainly differ...

It depends; most long term relationships are actually a form of "betabuxxing" i.e. providing resources for a foid in order for her to stay, so it lies on the actual severity of attraction and if the male is being cucked in other ways...

But yes, generally bankrupting your account for a foid with little to no actual attraction and a high possibility of the foid simply going behind your back to the average mogger, who knows you would be too docile to do anything if it was found out does not exactly sound like a enviable existence; it could be better with foids not yet so induced into hypergamy and moral degeneracy.

 

[UnknownR]

Love is nothing it's just a lust.