Serious Marxism has failed everytime it has been tried

[AsiaCel]

Marxism, and the descendants based on his idea, has failed miserably everytime and everywhere it has been tried. The basic idea in Marxism is that the current capitalistic state is overthrown, then workers establish the dictatorship of the proletariat, and in many years, the state and nation can finally be scrapped, along with money and class.

The 'utopia' of many communists is a world without countries, because many believe in internationalism that if the capitalistic countries exist, then they could 'corrupt' the 'utopia'.

The much regarded Marxism-Leninism and ML-Maoism is funny and ironic at times. Leninism added the idea of Vanguardism, in which a small group of 'elites' can bring others to follow the party. Maoism tells that you don't need to be industrialized before attempting that shit. Everyone knows what happened in these countries.

In a hypothetically working, post-revolution state, they pretty much return to elites leading the masses, does people actually think that the super rich elites in communist parties will actually give up their wealth and pursue the "let's go collective" dream?

I think Marxism's idea of revolution is a trap. That's why reddit commies' discussion are full of incomprehensible jargons, muuuh historical revisionism muuuh materialism and sheet.

 

[AsiaCel]

In short, Marxism believes that ultimate anarchy can be achieved by a willing ultimate totalitarian state.

 

[therealfonz]

Marxism, and the descendants based on his idea, has failed miserably everytime and everywhere it has been tried. The basic idea in Marxism is that the current capitalistic state is overthrown, then workers establish the dictatorship of the proletariat, and in many years, the state and nation can finally be scrapped, along with money and class.

The 'utopia' of many communists is a world without countries, because many believe in internationalism that if the capitalistic countries exist, then they could 'corrupt' the 'utopia'.

The much regarded Marxism-Leninism and ML-Maoism is funny and ironic at times. Leninism added the idea of Vanguardism, in which a small group of 'elites' can bring others to follow the party. Maoism tells that you don't need to be industrialized before attempting that shit. Everyone knows what happened in these countries.

In a hypothetically working, post-revolution state, they pretty much return to elites leading the masses, does people actually think that the super rich elites in communist parties will actually give up their wealth and pursue the "let's go collective" dream?

I think Marxism's idea of revolution is a trap.

It's almost as if 99.999% of people could never make it work due to low iq and greed.


It's like saying don't put money into military lets trust each other then your daughter is being raped by a foreign invader only fucking twitter african dance dropouts who rot on Twitter think that shit is possible fucking hassan fucktards

 

[Lonelyus]

I just want good pussy

 

[jeetcel]

good post but other side, the right wing is also not our (incels') friend - they go by darwinism and ableism and are far more normiepilled than leftists

someone made an entire thread covering that

Unpopular opinion but Right Wingers are more bluepilled than the left wing and u r retarded if you think they will help u

I will be the first person to call out the absolute degenracy/group think/the myopic view that sees a world of oppressors and opressed that the left holds. But there are some retards in here who genuinely believe that if Right Wingers will win that their life will be any better. Just because...

incels.is

 

[Phosphorus]

Water is wet

 

[LeFrenchCel]

I just want total richfag genocide