“The categorical normative”
[font='Times New Roman', serif]As an attempt to avoid the steady input of further pieces of precious Normie advice (and to spare dedicated Norman the hardship of this work) I tried to set up an universal formula in my incelellectual approach. [/font]
[font=Times New Roman, serif]These are the three highest maxims to live by according to Cunt: [/font]
[font=Times New Roman, serif]1. THE UNIVERSALIZABILITY RECIPE: [/font]
[font=Times New Roman, serif]"Act only according to the limited and completely anecdotal advice Norman provides whereby you must at the same time will that it should become an universal law.”[/font]
[font=Times New Roman, serif]Please let me explain this a little further to you because as usual the devil is in the detail. It basically means that your own life situation, your traumatic experiences of the past, your personal throwbacks and rejections and all these insignificant intricacies can never be considered a reliable source to base future decisions on. Norman's limited and completely anecdotal advice, his cherrypicked examples of minimal success with women whose appearances are already challenging the borderline of humanity are quite sufficient to disprove any aspect of the black pill or Lookism and should be set as an a priori truth. But be cautious: It's always useful to learn the normative terminology before any form of external application of this first maxim comes into play. Don't be shy to make use of the equally limited pool of relatable catchphrases Norman exemplifies in his contributions as an consolidation of your affiliation (even if you probably won't be advanced enough to understand the deeper meanings of them). [/font]
[font=Times New Roman, serif]2. THE FORMULA OF WORSHIP:[/font]
“[font=Times New Roman, serif]Act in such a way that you treat all females and their well-being, whether in your own person or in the person of any other, never as a means to an end, but always as the very end.”[/font]
[font=Times New Roman, serif]There's no such thing as an one-sided form of relationship anymore, especially not between males and females. According to Hegel's “Phenomenology of Spirit” there's a teleological end goal for the final fulfilment of our existence but the times have changed. The ultimate goal of your life in the 21st century should and must be the unlimited validation of the female organism. Long gone are the days when a relationship between men and women could be considered an equillibrium of mutual appreciation, interest or satisfaction of needs. The essence of your existence as a male and your new social role is servanthood now. This makes the very concept of any form of „cuckoldry“ a completely empty term. [/font]
[font=Times New Roman, serif]3. THE FORMULA OF “NON-INCLUSIVENESS”:[/font]
“[font=Times New Roman, serif]The third practical principle follows as the ultimate condition of harmony with contemporary reason (in order to distinguish it from outdated understandings of this term): the idea of the will of every non male-gendered being as an universally legislating will.”[/font]
[font=Times New Roman, serif]I know it may sound completely ridiculous to you but during the dark ages (the days before the sexual revolution liberated us from the toxic concept of fidelity) there has been a time when harmony meant that both parties involved in a monogamous relationship were equally satisfied. Of course this concept was flawed right from the start. It's exactly like Cunt said: “Entitlement is man's captivity in his self-imposed immaturity”, or in other words: “Learn your goddamn place. This is why you're incel.” By now it should be crystal clear that the nature of all men is that of a predator who's completely unable to control his own affections, archaic instincts and his toxic masculinity. As Norman rightly observed: The symptoms of male entitlement don't stop where any objective perception of reality ends. Because you are necessarily unable to comprehend your own wrongdoings you should never stop questioning yourself, your thoughts, your actions and your microaggressions. Even if you took a shower just a minute ago it doesn't mean that you won't smell like a derelict. This is why you're incel. Even if you politely asked a female for her consent to hold her hand it doesn't mean that at the same time you're not slaughtering her vintage cunt in another plane of reality, the most important one in existence so far: The female imagination. Falsely accused of narcissistic behaviour the female solipsism is what truly constitutes the borders of reality (as perceived). So never trust your own intuition: Every spark of cognitive dissonance you may have felt before must be surpressed because they simply are obsolete vestiges of your misogynist past. [/font]
