Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Blackpill Opposition to relationships between men and girls as young as 13 defies logic

IncelKing

IncelKing

Chaos is a laddER
★★★★★
Joined
Jan 7, 2019
Posts
9,564
There is so much outrage among normies when it comes to unattractive men feeling attracted to or wanting to date girls as young as 13 years old, they are automatically classified as pedophiles.



as you can see in the link above puberty begins in girls from the ages of 8-13. Starting puberty at the age of 8 or even 9 is rare, it is the exception not the norm.

pedophilia is the attraction to pre-pubescents, so Assuming that girls (around 80% of girls) start puberty from the age of 10, we can classify Pedophiles as being individuals who are attracted to girls who are under the age of 10.

[UWSL]Therefore, it is illogical to classify individuals who are attracted to 13 year old girls as pedophiles, because 13 year old girls have [/UWSL][UWSL]gone through most of their puberty phase, attraction to them makes you a hebephile (someone who is attracted to girls who are undergoing puberty), not a pedophile.[/UWSL]

[UWSL]The vast majority of men are hebephiles, the reason for this is that it is literally male nature to desire youth and fertility in females, girls who are 13 have already begun to menstruate and exhibit various other physical traits which indicate that they are ready for childbirth. [/UWSL]

[UWSL]even normies agree that it is male nature and normal for men to be hebephiles seeing as though in the field of psychology, pedophilia is considered to be a mental illness whereas hebephilia is NOT considered to be a mental illness, as you can see in the link below:[/UWSL]

[UWSL] [/UWSL]

[UWSL]That’s why it’s important to make the distinction between pedophilia and hebephilia.[/UWSL]

[UWSL]nature is literally signalling to us that these girls are fit to have sex/reproduce with, yet normies (and sadly even incels on this forum) are brainwashed into believing that some random arbitrary age which the government dictates (and which varies from country to country) is a more reliable measure of whether a girl is ready to have sex. [/UWSL]

[UWSL]for thousands of years, humans have relied on mother nature to decide when a girl is fit to reproduce and this age-old practice (pun-intended) has led to the birth of humans who have achieved great things and built civilisation as we know it, all those men who built cars, ships, planes and pioneered engineering and medicine, made scientific discoveries etc, were born from mothers who were likely 13-16 years old, those mothers had children when they were young and therefore they had high quality eggs which resulted in intelligent human beings being born.[/UWSL]

[UWSL]but in the modern era ever since age of consent cucked laws were introduced, we are seeing a rise in autistic children because women are having children at much older ages by which time the quality of their eggs have decreased significantly which means any children produced from those eggs are more likely to have genetic defects. The fact that there are way more autistic children being born in the modern era than in the past, can be confirmed from the link below:[/UWSL]


also, I can never understand the logic behind some of the age of consent laws which normies blindly support. Age of consent laws exist under the premise that girls below the age of consent will suffer physical damage to their bodies if they’re to have sex. But the law will allow a 15 year old Chad with a 7 inch cock to have sex with a 13 year old girl who he is most likely to cause physical damage and pain to, due to having a big penis.

meanwhile the same laws forbid and punish a 30 year old truecel with a 4 inch micro penis from having sex with the 13 year old female even though having sex with her will be far less physically painful and cause far less physical damage due to his small penis

get a load of that logic.
 
Last edited:
13 is too young
 
Also read every word very based and high iq :feelsYall:
 
I won’t go for illegal age femoids myself but anyone that cares about that type of shit is the ultimate cuckold or feminist.
 
says the guy whose AVI is that of a serial killer who fucked his victims corpses, go fuck a dead body you cucked soy necrophile
i don't give a fuck about necrophilia. i'd fuck a stacy corpse if given the chance. i don't give a fuck if you want kill rob rape burglarize or start massacres. but your victims are under 14, that's too far.
I don't even care about this stuff but why is 13 to young?
17 is fine but not 13
 
agecucks are feminist male soycucks

hangyourself faggot
i had a femoid classmate back in 7th grade planning to have sex with his college bf in a hotel near to our school
 
There is so much outrage among normies when it comes to unattractive men feeling attracted to or wanting to date girls as young as 13 years old, they are automatically classified as pedophiles.



as you can see in the link above puberty begins in girls from the ages of 8-13. Starting puberty at the age of 8 or even 9 is rare, it is the exception not the norm.

pedophilia is the attraction to pre-pubescents, so Assuming that girls (around 80% of girls) start puberty from the age of 10, we can classify Pedophiles as being individuals who are attracted to girls who are under the age of 10.

[UWSL]Therefore, it is illogical to classify individuals who are attracted to 13 year old girls as pedophiles, because 13 year old girls have [/UWSL][UWSL]gone through most of their puberty phase, attraction to them makes you a hebephile (someone who is attracted to girls who are undergoing puberty), not a pedophile.[/UWSL]

[UWSL]The vast majority of men are hebephiles, the reason for this is that it is literally male nature to desire youth and fertility in females, girls who are 13 have already begun to menstruate and exhibit various other physical traits which indicate that they are ready for childbirth. [/UWSL]

[UWSL]even normies agree that it is male nature and normal for men to be hebephiles seeing as though in the field of psychology, pedophilia is considered to be a mental illness whereas hebephilia is NOT considered to be a mental illness, as you can see in the link below:[/UWSL]

[UWSL] [/UWSL]

[UWSL]That’s why it’s important to make the distinction between pedophilia and hebephilia.[/UWSL]

[UWSL]nature is literally signalling to us that these girls are fit to have sex/reproduce with, yet normies (and sadly even incels on this forum) are brainwashed into believing that some random arbitrary age which the government dictates (and which varies from country to country) is a more reliable measure of whether a girl is ready to have sex. [/UWSL]

[UWSL]for thousands of years, humans have relied on mother nature to decide when a girl is fit to reproduce and this age-old practice (pun-intended) has led to the birth of humans who have achieved great things and built civilisation as we know it, all those men who built cars, ships, planes and pioneered engineering and medicine, made scientific discoveries etc, were born from mothers who were likely 13-16 years old, those mothers had children when they were young and therefore they had high quality eggs which resulted in intelligent human beings being born.[/UWSL]

[UWSL]but in the modern era ever since age of consent cucked laws were introduced, we are seeing a rise in autistic children because women are having children at much older ages by which time the quality of their eggs have decreased significantly which means any children produced from those eggs are more likely to have genetic defects. The fact that there are way more autistic children being born in the modern era than in the past, can be confirmed from the link below:[/UWSL]


also, I can never understand the logic behind some of the age of consent laws which normies blindly support. Age of consent laws exist under the premise that girls below the age of consent will suffer physical damage to their bodies if they’re to have sex. But the law will allow a 15 year old Chad with a 7 inch cock to have sex with a 13 year old girl who he is most likely to cause physical damage and pain to, due to having a big penis.

meanwhile the same laws forbid and punish a 30 year old truecel with a 4 inch micro penis from having sex with the 13 year old female even though having sex with her will be far less physically painful and cause far less physical damage due to his small penis

get a load of that logic.
Correct. Back in the old days, women were married at 12 years old.

13 is too young
Its close to the limit but its still within a normal range.
13 is too young
Its close to the limit but its still within a normal range.
 
I really don't understand the age of consent, 100 years ago you were a man with 14yo and just 50 years ago was common to marry a 13 yo so what changed that made the AOC increase? Nothing except retarded life experiences, overprotective parents that don't let their children mature and face the world.
I believe the decadence we face today is product of this retarded adulthood.
The elites planned this and they want to increase it even more because it's easier to control kids or kidlike adults than grown ups

Just imagine being 18 and only play games at school, that may happen because it happened not long ago, now 12yo play games 24/7 while in the past had to work. In 20 years 18yo will be like current 12yo :feelskek:
 
Last edited:
That's cucked. Who cares what happens if there under 14, adam lanza was giga based and he killed kids. They'll just grow up anyway to be scummy humans.

adam Lanza did nothing wrong, free him!

oh wait, he’s dead nvm
 
He's free from this hellscape, hopefully I'll die soon to.

don’t die before getting your retribution against this sick society (in GTA V of course)
 
13 is too young
i don't give a fuck about necrophilia. i'd fuck a stacy corpse if given the chance. i don't give a fuck if you want kill rob rape burglarize or start massacres. but your victims are under 14, that's too far.

17 is fine but not 13
Thank you for proving OP's point, you're saying rape of 14 year olds is fine but consensual sex with a 13 year old is not okay, all because of arbitrary numbers. You logic is "middle school". But the difference between middle and high school is just some number assigned by the goveernment, like how on reddit they will say 18 is fine but 17 is not, which is not logical but emotional.
 
Thank you for proving OP's point, you're saying rape of 14 year olds is fine but consensual sex with a 13 year old is not okay, all because of arbitrary numbers. You logic is "middle school". But the difference between middle and high school is just some number assigned by the goveernment, like how on reddit they will say 18 is fine but 17 is not, which is not logical but emotional.

exactly, this guy thinks fucking corpses and going on mass murders is ok but it’s somehow morally wrong to have consensual sex with a 13 year old who is already having sex at that age and is likely not even a virgin.

jfl I don’t know how guys like this even exist, they have no logic to their thought process
 
View attachment 574383

"b-b-but hes older so therefore there is a power imbalance between them you sick 20yo khhv pedo fuck imagine taking advantage of an innocent little naive 13yo child i hope you get brutally raped and die in agony you subhuman monster!!!!!!111!!!:soy::soy::soy::foidSoy::foidSoy::foidSoy::foidSoy::foidSoy::foidSoy::soy::feels::feels::soy::soy::soy::soy::soy:"

Normies think a 13 year old who has already sucked many chad dicks is still an innocent little angel, also normies claim to be morally good people who have an aversion to violence and murder, yet ironically they never hesitate to call for the castration, torture and murder of hebephile men whom they wrongly classify as pedophiles, despite the fact that hepebhilia is completely natural which is reflected in the fact that hebephilia isn’t even considered to be a mental illness in the field of psychiatry.
 
Last edited:
I really don't understand the age of consent, 100 years ago you were a man with 14yo and just 50 years ago was common to marry a 13 yo so what changed that made the AOC increase? Nothing except retarded life experiences, overprotective parents that don't let their children mature and face the world.
I believe the decadence we face today is product of this retarded adulthood.
The elites planned this and they want to increase it even more because it's easier to control kids or kidlike adults than grown ups

Just imagine being 18 and only play games at school, that may happen because it happened not long ago, now 12yo play games 24/7 while in the past had to work. In 20 years 18yo will be like current 12yo :feelskek:
the elites of society know that the only chance for incel men to ascend is to marry a young girl because they can’t get adult women to be interested in them as those women are chad only, but young girls are less selective about looks and care more about finding a husband who has the wealth to take care of her like a father-figure once she leaves her real father behind, she would also place importance on personality as she wants a husband with a good character who will treat her with dignity and respect befitting of a wife unlike boys her age who would just pump and dump her.

however, if incel men could marry so easily, they would be less hard-working and contribute less to society because simply having an average income would be enough to keep a wife. But by creating AOC laws which forbid incels from pursuing young girls, forcing them to instead pursue older females who will reject them based on looks, sexual starvation leaves incels with no choice but to gain significant wealth in order to get older women to overlook their looks and view them as viable partners because of their wealth.

The only way for incels to achieve such wealth is through innovation, creation, invention and facilitation of progress/development in society, all of which benefits society and therefore benefits the elites of society.

this is the reason AOC laws were written
 
Last edited:
the elites of society know that the only chance for incel men to ascend is to marry a young girl because they can’t get adult women to be interested in them as those women are chad only, but young girls are less selective about looks and care more about finding a husband who has the wealth to take care of her like a father-figure once she leaves her real father behind, she would also place importance on personality as she wants a husband with a good character who will treat her with dignity and respect befitting of a wife unlike boys her age who would just pump and dump her.

however, if incel men could marry so easily, they would be less hard-working and contribute less to society because simply having an average income would be enough to keep a wife. But by creating AOC laws which forbid incels from pursuing young girls, forcing them to instead pursue older females who will reject them based on looks, sexual starvation leaves incels with no choice but to gain significant wealth in order to get older women to overlook their looks and view them as viable partners because of their wealth.

The only way for incels to achieve such wealth is through innovation, creation, invention and facilitation of progress/development in society, all of which benefits society and therefore benefits the elites of society.

this is the reason AOC laws were written
Yes, and interestingly enough the inverse has occured, many men decide to "drop out", and work part-time/dead-end jobs, or just go pure NEET. They realize the odds are super low to get a quality wife even if they work hard and they would likely get a used up roastie, so they just focus on self preservation and copes. Some of these men also decide to escort as well to satisfy their itch for sex.
 
Yes, and interestingly enough the inverse has occured, many men decide to "drop out", and work part-time/dead-end jobs, or just go pure NEET. They realize the odds are super low to get a quality wife even if they work hard and they would likely get a used up roastie, so they just focus on self preservation and copes. Some of these men also decide to escort as well to satisfy their itch for sex.

yes, that is the irony, elites tried to make incels more hard-working but it just made them lose hope and give up. Elites are realising their mistakes now but taking away female rights would cause backlash from simps who love women and worship women so much that they will fight for female rights even though women’s rights being taken away will benefit those simps more, but they are too brainwashed to realise that.
 
i had a femoid classmate back in 7th grade planning to have sex with his college bf in a hotel near to our school

she is an innocent little angel who doesn’t even know that sex exists, according to normies.
 
I don't even care about this stuff but why is 13 to young?
2A8FFDA4 1C6B 407C AC67 C6A9CAFB4B0B
 
I am autistic because my mother had me when she was 38.
 
There is so much outrage among normies when it comes to unattractive men feeling attracted to or wanting to date girls as young as 13 years old, they are automatically classified as pedophiles.



as you can see in the link above puberty begins in girls from the ages of 8-13. Starting puberty at the age of 8 or even 9 is rare, it is the exception not the norm.

pedophilia is the attraction to pre-pubescents, so Assuming that girls (around 80% of girls) start puberty from the age of 10, we can classify Pedophiles as being individuals who are attracted to girls who are under the age of 10.

[UWSL]Therefore, it is illogical to classify individuals who are attracted to 13 year old girls as pedophiles, because 13 year old girls have [/UWSL][UWSL]gone through most of their puberty phase, attraction to them makes you a hebephile (someone who is attracted to girls who are undergoing puberty), not a pedophile.[/UWSL]

[UWSL]The vast majority of men are hebephiles, the reason for this is that it is literally male nature to desire youth and fertility in females, girls who are 13 have already begun to menstruate and exhibit various other physical traits which indicate that they are ready for childbirth. [/UWSL]

[UWSL]even normies agree that it is male nature and normal for men to be hebephiles seeing as though in the field of psychology, pedophilia is considered to be a mental illness whereas hebephilia is NOT considered to be a mental illness, as you can see in the link below:[/UWSL]

[UWSL] [/UWSL]

[UWSL]That’s why it’s important to make the distinction between pedophilia and hebephilia.[/UWSL]

[UWSL]nature is literally signalling to us that these girls are fit to have sex/reproduce with, yet normies (and sadly even incels on this forum) are brainwashed into believing that some random arbitrary age which the government dictates (and which varies from country to country) is a more reliable measure of whether a girl is ready to have sex. [/UWSL]

[UWSL]for thousands of years, humans have relied on mother nature to decide when a girl is fit to reproduce and this age-old practice (pun-intended) has led to the birth of humans who have achieved great things and built civilisation as we know it, all those men who built cars, ships, planes and pioneered engineering and medicine, made scientific discoveries etc, were born from mothers who were likely 13-16 years old, those mothers had children when they were young and therefore they had high quality eggs which resulted in intelligent human beings being born.[/UWSL]

[UWSL]but in the modern era ever since age of consent cucked laws were introduced, we are seeing a rise in autistic children because women are having children at much older ages by which time the quality of their eggs have decreased significantly which means any children produced from those eggs are more likely to have genetic defects. The fact that there are way more autistic children being born in the modern era than in the past, can be confirmed from the link below:[/UWSL]


also, I can never understand the logic behind some of the age of consent laws which normies blindly support. Age of consent laws exist under the premise that girls below the age of consent will suffer physical damage to their bodies if they’re to have sex. But the law will allow a 15 year old Chad with a 7 inch cock to have sex with a 13 year old girl who he is most likely to cause physical damage and pain to, due to having a big penis.

meanwhile the same laws forbid and punish a 30 year old truecel with a 4 inch micro penis from having sex with the 13 year old female even though having sex with her will be far less physically painful and cause far less physical damage due to his small penis

get a load of that logic.
I don’t see the issue with being attracted to 13 year old girls. Most 13 yr old girls look like adults already and dress like sluts, it is a crime against humanity to deny men the pleasure of 13 yr old pussy. :feelsree::feelsree::feelsree:
 
pedophilia is the attraction to pre-pubescents, so Assuming that girls (around 80% of girls) start puberty from the age of 10, we can classify Pedophiles as being individuals who are attracted to girls who are under the age of 10.
OP is wrong, pedophilia is attraction to pre-pubescent boys

term for attraction to pre-pubescent girls is korephilia


[UWSL]Therefore, it is illogical to classify individuals who are attracted to 13 year old girls as pedophiles, because 13 year old girls have [/UWSL][UWSL]gone through most of their puberty phase, attraction to them makes you a hebephile (someone who is attracted to girls who are undergoing puberty), not a pedophile.[/UWSL]

correct, though a synonym for that is also parthenophile


[UWSL]even normies agree that it is male nature and normal for men to be hebephiles seeing as though in the field of psychology, pedophilia is considered to be a mental illness whereas hebephilia is NOT considered to be a mental illness[/UWSL]
this does not say anything about normies since most normies are too ignorant to even read the DSM

[UWSL] it’s important to make the distinction between pedophilia and hebephilia[/UWSL]
It's more important to make the distinction between pedophile/korephile and to ephebophile/parthenophile
 
Normies have never had an imperative to be perfectly rational, logical agents. They can believe X and the opposite of X simultaneously. Muh logical arguments mean nothing to them. Only feels, manufactured groupthink/consensus, and the perceived morality (also manufactured) of the position.

As for foids, antagonism to this type of relationship is logical insofar as it is in their interest that such a thing not become normal. Imagine being a post prime 30 year old Foid, coming off of 15 years of being sport-fucked, on the prowl for a provider, and your competition is brand new, unused, sub 20 year old pussy. It’s foids recoiling because the inclusion of prime pussy into the sexual market plummets their own SMV.
 

Similar threads

highschoolcel
Replies
30
Views
1K
Max Doltman
M
Logic55
Replies
10
Views
601
baja jagodinac
baja jagodinac
Shrek
Replies
24
Views
1K
turbosperg
turbosperg
AsiaCel
Replies
22
Views
711
entombed
entombed
AsiaCel
Replies
2
Views
303
Julaybib
Julaybib

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top