I knew he was part of BLM. And I agree he's dumb for not staying in his state. But still this only happened because these riots are being allowed to spread and destroy.
NSFW Prepare for every non cucked man in America to get Rittenhoused.
I knew he was part of BLM. And I agree he's dumb for not staying in his state. But still this only happened because these riots are being allowed to spread and destroy.
D
Free him. Fuck dirty communists and pedophiles.
He probably went out there wanting to kill crazy thugs. I don't think it's wrong for someone to go out and pick fights with potential murderers, so he can kill them before they kill other people.
Rioting in the street is probable cause to keep them off the street. If current measures can't keep them off the street, new measures are needed.
Also, he didn't instigate this. They pulled guns on him first. Self defense, pure and simple. If I go into the hood armed, even if I hope someone pulls a gun on me, if they threaten me with a gun I get to defend myself.
No, it isn't -- if you can't prove in court that someone was doing anything more than simply being there. The cops don't get to change the rules because the current rules aren't working.
What? So if I'm an arsonist, how do they keep me off the streets? Because they tend to keep arsonists off the streets. Except now, for some reason.
They arrest you and gather the evidence that is necessary to charge you.
In a chaotic situation, they don't have enough resources to detain and charge every participant.
I agree that it's nonsense, I support shooting anyone who gets violent with you. But do the courts? I remember a case about a woman, a WOMAN, who shot her husband in matter-of-fact self defense, and the courts still debated "Yeah but did she need to use a gun?"
But in a chaotic situation they're still obligated to keep the peace. Public safety trumps every other issue. That's why we do things like call in the National Guard.
D
based.
he shouldve killed more people
He mustve felt like he was playing CoD zombies
he shouldve killed more people
and send their leaders to guantanamo
He mustve felt like he was playing CoD zombies
Last edited:
D
@tehgymcel420 @wereqryan
Rittenhouse is getting defended by the alt-right and conservatives rn while getting hated on by leftists.
If he looked like an ethnic non-black male he would have no supporters nor be a focal point in the news. He'd likely just be sent to prison without much fanfare.
Rittenhouse is getting defended by the alt-right and conservatives rn while getting hated on by leftists.
If he looked like an ethnic non-black male he would have no supporters nor be a focal point in the news. He'd likely just be sent to prison without much fanfare.
No it doesn't. That's not how the law works.
If you don't have enough evidence to charge someone who is currently detained, then you let him or her go.
That is how the law works. If there's unrest in the city, it's the authorities' job to quell that unrest. That's how it's always worked. In times worse than these, and in times calmer than these. You don't just let rioters go.
Here's the thing: state and local authorities have a legal obligation to respect a person's 4th Amendment rights. They don't, however, have a legal obligation to quell an unrest in any particular manner or fashion. Do they have a political obligation to? Yes. But you're confusing two very different concepts. Side note: they don't have a legal obligation to arrest or charge any particular person either.
To respect someone's 4th Amendment rights, that means letting them go (after all, every individual is afforded the presumption of innocence) if you don't have the evidence necessary to win a probable cause hearing beyond a certain period of time, which in most cases is 48 hours. If more evidence turns up a few weeks or months or even years later, you can re-arrest that individual after obtaining a warrant. How is that difficult to understand?
The thing is you, like most normies, don't know how the law works. You think you know how the law works because you can't envision a society in which the law works another way, and because you think that's how the law should work.
Who
I
I don't know wtf is going on in the west right now. I'm rotting safely in neetdom though
Vigilantism is normalfaggot behaviour. If he was going about his own business or defending his own home, it would be another issue.
If the police observe you committing a crime, they have probable cause to detain you. That's how they detain people, that's what jail is. As opposed to "prison."
"No, you're a poopyhead!"
Oh, grow up.
You and I both know that only burgernormies are crazy enough to entertain the idea of 17-year-old untrained civilians being allowed to own semi-automatic rifles, let alone allowing them to walk around in public with those weapons to ostensibly "keep the peace".
You're missing the point. You can read, can't you?
If I'm not mistaken, you're complaining about rioters being arrested and then released the same day. I'm simply pointing out why the police are releasing individuals they arrested earlier in the day -- it's because they are legally obligated to release individuals if they choose not to charge them within a set period of time.
Last edited:
lmao ok monke
Hopefully he is an incel and court understand he was defending himself but I am pretty sure the courts will fuck him over to keep the sjw and blm fags happy.
The same way that paedophile hunters run stupid stings so they can virtue-signal on YouTube?
In any case, that wasn't even his neighbourhood, the kid crossed state lines to defend a gas station.
D
Saw this on the front page of reddit:
View: https://www.reddit.com/r/PublicFreakout/comments/iixaux/kyle_rittenhouse_along_with_other_white_males/
The kind of stories that trend really show the narrative that site pushes.
View: https://www.reddit.com/r/PublicFreakout/comments/iixaux/kyle_rittenhouse_along_with_other_white_males/
The kind of stories that trend really show the narrative that site pushes.
Similar threads
Users who are viewing this thread
