Discussion Racist Swedish government trying to stop men from marrying Thai women (Feminism's use of demographics to cuck nations)

[Deleted member 27204]

I was just fucking around, curries are submissive with the caste system and wouldn't do shit about their situation, just like in the last thousands of years.

Dude fuck off. Many Indians were raised underneath the caste system and had no need to "rise against". It worked fine for them for many years and no system on earth is perfect.
You took some leftist South Asian course and now think you know better than others and can shit on Indians even more. I see through your disguise.

Holy shit you keep repeating arguments. I already completely debunked the pint that India was economically held back, it grew at the same rate it was growing at before. This is a point you didn't address accept saying it obviously did ruin India with 0 evidence.

Famines and indentured servitude don't count as lower living standards? You said living standards didn't change during the time the British were in India. It's not all about economy and yet there are many other things to take into account that aren't easily quantified.

Evidence famines in India were made worse by Winston Churchill:

Winston Churchill killed as many as the worst genocidal dictators of the 20th century, says Indian politician

'This is a man the British would have us hail as an apostle of freedom and democracy,' says author

www.independent.co.uk

Churchill's policies contributed to 1943 Bengal famine – study

Study is first time weather data has been used argue wartime policies exacerbated famine

www.theguardian.com

Churchill’s policies to blame for 1943 Bengal famine: Study

The Bengal famine that is estimated to have killed up to three million people was not caused by drought, new study says.

www.aljazeera.com

Evidence of abuse and suffering Indians suffered at the hands of British colonial rule:

Colonialism in India was traumatic – including for some of the British officials who ruled the Raj

How one member of the Indian Civil Service coped with being a colonial usurper.

theconversation.com

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/09612029400200071

Politically, India was had many kingdoms and empires fighting one another. I don't see any evidence of India being politically worse off.
And yeah, the dumb border that was drawn is a huge source of issues today. It should have been broken by ethnicity, but of course the British were too lazy and the Indian leaders probably didn't want that because they thought somehow all these ethnic groups would be united. Clearly history has shown both these were destructive assumptions and decisions.

India is a diverse subcontinent meant to have many kingdoms and empires but the British saw things purely from a Muslim vs Hindu perspective and insisted on divvying up India into Pakistan and India before they left. It has been the source of India being politically worse off since then.

The borders shouldn't have been drawn up at all arbitrarily in the first place and the fact that they were has continued to lead to unnecessary political disputes to this day.

 

[Copexodius Maximus]

Dude fuck off. Many Indians were raised underneath the caste system and had no need to "rise against". It worked fine for them for many years and no system on earth is perfect.
You took some leftist South Asian course and now think you know better than others and can shit on Indians even more. I see through your disguise.

giga curry cope. The difference between the systems in most the world and India is that in India the rich are born to be rich, while in other places there is motility and you can decide to do another occupation. As for leftist courses, it wasn't, I know why the system was implemented by the Mauryas, it was better than the older tribal model that existed, but obviously compared to most the world that doesn't live in tribes, it's pretty backwards.

Famines and indentured servitude don't count as lower living standards? You said living standards didn't change during the time the British were in India. It's not all about economy and yet there are many other things to take into account that aren't easily quantified.

Yes, the British did cause massive famines due to forcing people to grow crops that were profitable but didn't feed them. I never even said the British were good leaders (not that people there before were good leaders either), but at the end of their rule, India as a whole was not worse off than when the before the British came. They were not politically better off before and they weren't economically better off. You can't say the British held India back because it would grown at the same rate as it did under them, and by 1947 the end result was the same economically. Saying that India is poor now and has failed to progress as much as other nations is not Britain's fault.

 

[Deleted member 27204]

giga curry cope. The difference between the systems in most the world and India is that in India the rich are born to be rich, while in other places there is motility and you can decide to do another occupation. As for leftist courses, it wasn't, I know why the system was implemented by the Mauryas, it was better than the older tribal model that existed, but obviously compared to most the world that doesn't live in tribes, it's pretty backwards.

Shut up you racist communist jewish trash.
"giga curry cope"
Coming from someone with profile description
Truest of the true kikecels

You have delusions of grandeur defending a long dead empire that you live vicariously through and you brought up how Anglos subjugated ethnic countries to gloat. You continue to act like an arrogant parasite even though I provided links and think you can just dismiss Indians suffering under British colonial rule. You deserve to be incel.

Yes, the British did cause massive famines due to forcing people to grow crops that were profitable but didn't feed them. I never even said the British were good leaders (not that people there before were good leaders either), but at the end of their rule, India as a whole was not worse off than when the before the British came. They were not politically better off before and they weren't economically better off. You can't say the British held India back because it would grown at the same rate as it did under them, and by 1947 the end result was the same economically. Saying that India is poor now and has failed to progress as much as other nations is not Britain's fault.

Yes the British did hold India back.
muh growth.
STFU you stupid retard I already told you that there's more factors than the rate at which India grew under the British like the famines and indentured servitude the Indian people suffered through. And India being poor now and it having failed to progress as much as other nations is Britain's fault because them plundering India's wealth and not giving it back set India back economically and them divvying up India into India and Pakistan hastily are responsible for sectarian disputes that have held back economic progress since then. I thought this would be simple to understand but obviously not and you insist on coping with the vestiges of a long dead British Empire.

Thank god the British Empire is dead.
I hope it never comes back.
I hope people in the UK and other anglo countries that continue to justify the atrocities that the British Empire keep suffering economic and social decline.
I hope the hypocritical pieces of shit here that mock Indian guys just like normies do and overdo the just be curry meme while lusting over ethnic women just like hypocritical normies do never ascend.

This my final post to you.
I'm not changing my opinion that the British should be forced to give up the wealth they stole from India.
You can have the last word like the passive aggressive BITCH that you are.

 

[Copexodius Maximus]

Shut up you racist communist jewish trash.
"giga curry cope"
Coming from someone with profile description
Truest of the true kikecels

How am I racist or communist, I clearly said I was trolling about a curry revolution because they were too cucked by their caste system to ever rebel against it. And what's wrong the problem of me being the most subhuman kikecel in existance? If it's the case then that's just how it is.

You have delusions of grandeur defending a long dead empire that you live vicariously through and you brought up how Anglos subjugated ethnic countries to gloat. You continue to act like an arrogant parasite even though I provided links and think you can just dismiss Indians suffering under British colonial rule. You deserve to be incel.

I was simply saying that curries blaming British for living in a shit hole is illogical. Curryland was a shithole before and was still a shithole after, the British didn't make it into a bigger shithole. Everything that the Anglos did to Curries has nothing to do with this argument.

Yes the British did hold India back.
muh growth.
STFU you stupid retard I already told you that there's more factors than the rate at which India grew under the British like the famines and indentured servitude the Indian people suffered through. And India being poor now and it having failed to progress as much as other nations is Britain's fault because them plundering India's wealth and not giving it back set India back economically and them divvying up India into India and Pakistan hastily are responsible for sectarian disputes that have held back economic progress since then. I thought this would be simple to understand but obviously not and you insist on coping with the vestiges of a long dead British Empire.

That long history of famines and other stuff isn't holding back India in 1947 because even after all of that, the economy is still at a similar to before. Giving all the wealth that Britain took from wealthy people in India would imply that at the end of all that India got poorer, but this is blatantly not true as we saw from the article. Britain shouldn't have to give shit to India. Curryland needs to build itself up and its infrastructure and move on, but of course it doesn't, instead they are desperate for people who looted the nations many generations ago to give back the stuff to the rich families they came from, despite having lost it in warfare.
Saying the India-Pakistan dispute is a legitimate concern, but saying British are made the country poorer overall is complere disinformation. Even if there was indentured servitude, in 1947 all that was done. So look at the country at that point after the British left, and from there we can say the British can't be blamed for India not being able to progress as much as other countries.

Thank god the British Empire is dead.
I hope it never comes back.
I hope people in the UK and other anglo countries that continue to justify the atrocities that the British Empire keep suffering economic and social decline.
I hope the hypocritical pieces of shit here that mock Indian guys just like normies do and overdo the just be curry meme while lusting over ethnic women just like hypocritical normies do never ascend.

I never justified any atrocities committed, I'm specifically debunking the claim that they held back India from progressing to this day, and that's simply not the case. I have said the curry kings before that British were also pretty shitty, but you were a complete cuck and said it's better to be humiliated by other curries than an anglo. There is no logic to almost anything you say, and now you are mad for no reason other than a discussion on an internet forum. Pretty sad.

This my final post to you.
I'm not changing my opinion that the British should be forced to give up the wealth they stole from India.
You can have the last word like the passive aggressive BITCH that you are.

If you knew anything about economics, you will know throwing money at a problem won't make it go away. Even if India is given hundreds of billions of dollars, it still won't do much to fix the situation. The problem with India isn't the lack of money, as capitalism is literally an engine for wealth generation, but rather the lack of effective organization of varying governmental institutions and corporate regulations.

I'm not being passive aggressive, I'm saying what is on my mind.

 

[RREEEEEEEEE]

bullshit you clearly took a side with stormfrontcels. You didn't just "post about other religions, culture, and countries:


Swedish men taking muh women..........after we moved to Sweden."

@RREEEEEEEEE


muh progress. Dude anglos are hated because they went and subjugated people in their own lands. Remember the Opium Wars in China? Remember how they threatened Japan to open up to international trade in the 1800s? Remember how they treated Indians as indentured servants in India and tried to enforce their customs on them like banning sati? The Amritsar massacre?
Fuck out of here.

Jfl at stormfrontcucks and their sympathizers. They think spewing hatred against ethnic men "to save muh precious white women" will get them any pussy. When they realize they're too subhuman, they resort to stealing Asian men's women but the only difference is Asians aren't forming gangs to kill cumskins to get the job done. Jfl at them.

 

[Copexodius Maximus]

Jfl at stormfrontcucks and their sympathizers. They think spewing hatred against ethnic men "to save muh precious white women" will get them any pussy. When they realize they're too subhuman, they resort to stealing Asian men's women but the only difference is Asians aren't forming gangs to kill cumskins to get the job done. Jfl at them.

Nice strawman, I don't sympathize with storm cucks. All I said is that if someone moves to a different country, the family is going to eventually get absorbed into the larger population over a few generations. That's just how it works.

 

[Deleted member 29983]

In the last 10 years, the number of Thai women marrying Swedish men has tripled, and the numbers keeps growing.
The government of Sweden is looking into trying to limit the number of women that come from Thailand.
THEY ARE LITERALLY CALLING THIS A DIVISIVE AND POLITICAL ISSUE. Yet not a word when millions of Muslim men enter Sweden as fake refugees.
Women don't want an influx of women into the country because they know if there is more pussy to go around, a doubling of females in the market halves their SMV.
But when it come letting in millions of males from the Middle East, Swedish girls are cheering in the streets about "Refugees Welcome".
When there are way more men than women in a country (true in almost every country under for age < 40), they have to compete and simp for women who don't have to try.
This desperation for female attention due to artificial inflation of female SMV is how men become more and more cucked, and how more and more left wing cucked laws are able to be passed.


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0CF83r2U58c&ab_channel=UndeadChronicXIV

The hypocrisy. Like holy shit let the men fuck whoever they want. It's so hypocritical and ironic that these fucking foids can fuck whoever they want because "muh oppression" and "yay feminism" yet when we do the same shit the entire fucking government is preventing them from trying to find love. Fucking piece of shit socialists Swedish government fucks.

idc cos im ethnic, us ethnic guys get our women taken by white guys who are upset white women egos have inflated

That's true. Curry foids always trying to ascend in the caste system by marrying white men so they can look more beautiful. So sad.

 

[Copexodius Maximus]

The hypocrisy. Like holy shit let the men fuck whoever they want. It's so hypocritical and ironic that these fucking foids can fuck whoever they want because "muh oppression" and "yay feminism" yet when we do the same shit the entire fucking government is preventing them from trying to find love. Fucking piece of shit socialists Swedish government fucks.


That's true. Curry foids always trying to ascend in the caste system by marrying white men so they can look more beautiful. So sad.

sexual liberation is only for females, that's why abortion is allowed by a female for any reason but a man is forced to pay for a kid he never wanted, even if she gets your sperm from a toilet paper you used to clean after fapping.

 

[RREEEEEEEEE]

Nice strawman, I don't sympathize with storm cucks. All I said is that if someone moves to a different country, the family is going to eventually get absorbed into the larger population over a few generations. That's just how it works.

If it doesn't apply to you why are you responding to it?

 

[Gymcelled]

jfl this was never an issue when millions of men were getting in, but the moment foids start coming it's a problem

Foids never actually cared about "refugees", they just wanted to have more men to choose from and to tilt the male/female gender ratio in their favor

 

[Copexodius Maximus]

If it doesn't apply to you why are you responding to it?

Sorry brocel, I was getting accusations by people left and right.

jfl this was never an issue when millions of men were getting in, but the moment foids start coming it's a problem

Foids never actually cared about "refugees", they just wanted to have more men to choose from and to tilt the male/female gender ratio in their favor

Sexual liberation is for females only. That's why women can have abortions, while men are forced to pay for kids they never wanted.

 

[RREEEEEEEEE]

Sorry brocel, I was getting accusations by people left and right.


Sexual liberation is for females only. That's why women can have abortions, while men are forced to pay for kids they never wanted.

Don't worry bro.

 

[Norwood Cemetery]

They knew it would be Chadberg or Chadstein, most likely

 

[DoomedCel]

indians do not shit in the street
View attachment 355306
if you hate hindus so much then dont use the USB kek or our numerical systems
View attachment 355307
why cant you faggot jbwmaxxers fakecels leave the fourm jfl

I wouldnt even mind living in my state of tamilnadu but i dont have citizenship there

An Indian friend told me there are laws in India that allow any ethnic Indian to get citizenship to return to live in India.

No one does though, because India is a shit hole for 95% of the people living in it. The amount of times I hear western curries talking about how superior India is to the west jfl.

 

[Deleted member 23981]

An Indian friend told me there are laws in India that allow any ethnic Indian to get citizenship to return to live in India.

No one does though, because India is a shit hole for 95% of the people living in it. The amount of times I hear western curries talking about how superior India is to the west jfl.

ye, maby i'd go back to my state becos its ok,but india is filled with street shitters and subhumans, i was coping at that time cos i was triggered and bpd cos of sfcels triggering me on looksmax, but now i reverted back to my normal mentality of realising indians are subhuman and desearved to be nuked. only pashtans, central aisan looking, and high caste indo nordic phenotype people should be allowed - fuck i hate being a pajeet

 

[Copexodius Maximus]

An Indian friend told me there are laws in India that allow any ethnic Indian to get citizenship to return to live in India.

Sounds like Israel 2.0

 

[DoomedCel]

Sounds like Israel 2.0

Yup. Indians are like Jews in many ways.

 

[To koniec]

Hatred, Insecurity, Jealousy, Pride and Stupidity.

These WN fags would rather save a drowing White Chad over a truecel ethnic.

"Great White Hope baby"
"White Pride baby"


It is closeted cuckoldry.

necro ( i know ), but do you think that ethnics will save white incel rather than ethnic chad ? tribalism is real, wake up

 

[Copexodius Maximus]

necro ( i know ), but do you think that ethnics will save white incel rather than ethnic chad ? tribalism is real, wake up

Any incel who does that deserves to rot and see other women fuck the chad like the cuck he is.

 

[squirrelsonfire2]

Any country with a feminist government deserves to be nuked tbh

 

[curryboy420]

idc cos im ethnic, us ethnic guys get our women taken by white guys who are upset white women egos have inflated

 

[slavcel11]

View: https://youtu.be/dMVuTte1jNc

thanks god I'm not living there, holy fuck

 

[Copexodius Maximus]

Any country with a feminist government deserves to be nuked tbh

true