Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Media Sean Penn the latest dude to come under fire for comments about #MeToo

FrothySolutions

FrothySolutions

Post like the FBI is watching.
★★★★★
Joined
May 6, 2018
Posts
19,894
Let's see here. Henry Cavill, Michael Douglas, William H. Macy, Norm MacDonald, Bill Burr, that one old French actress whose name I forgot but she had the backing of this big petition of French film notables behind her, and now Sean Penn. More and more people keep raising the questions we need to be asking about #MeToo. And these people raising the questions aren't being immediately ostracized. Bill Burr, for instance, somehow keeps getting to be on Conan. I don't know how he does it.

Sean Penn in particular said that #MeToo works to divide men and women. And that's plain to see for anyone brave enough to admit it. #MeToo wants to assign a gender to who the good guys and the bad guys are. They wanna talk about all the bad men. Even though there are bad women. Cory Feldman's been fighting a battle against some lady whose name I forget because no one ever talks about it. Not when they can say "But Louis CK tried to hook up with co-workers, that's just as bad, right?" Not when they can lament the plight of women specifically. And the odd gay man. As long as they're a victim of male treachery.

If we had an immigration policy that said "No Brown People" because "Well, most terrorists are brown people" that would never sell. Especially not in this day and age. Because even if you manage to catch terrorists with that kind of policy, it's based in divisive racism. And can't be called justice. #MeToo isn't about catching terrorists. It's about catching brown terrorists.
 
#MeToo is the new Puritanism. "Sexist", "unchaste" and "degenerate" basically all translate to "not being ashamed of the desire to have sex only for pleasure instead of procreation."

Sexuality is the core of the person, and people who experience some joy, freedom and autonomy are more likely to fight for the expansion of this area of freedom and autonomy also in the political and economical realm. If you want to create obedient servants with an appetite for authoritarian misery, you have to spoil every opportunity for them to enjoy sexual pleasures.

This is why only anti-sexual strains of religions could so easily survive. Religions are not bad per se, it's just that the good religions aren't politically useful to stabilize unjust class domination. And what religions did in the past, feminism does now: ruin sexuality, ruin the relationship between men and women, make sexual fulfillment and joy impossible, make everything neurotic - everyone always has to have this "earworm" in his head, that constantly says sin, sin, sin, sexist, sexist, sexist.

For women, there is the additional thing that they are hypergamous and only like a minority of men anyway. So they use it to criminalize the sexual desires of low-status men. It's just a tool for them to keep all low-status men away from them. They want to be total sluts for a minority of Chads, of course.

At the end of the day, it will make both men and women miserable.
 
metoo is just a way for women to ruin guys career because they pissed them off
 

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top