Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Blackpill SexualVR&AIRobotPill: Society getting scared about Sexual VR for short and ugly guys.

  • Thread starter Deleted member 10124
  • Start date
D

Deleted member 10124

Self-banned
-
Joined
Jul 8, 2018
Posts
13,411

They really want us to be asexual, homosexual or dead.

They simply can't allow us to have any enjoyment of any heterosexual sexual feeling whatsoever can they?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
@NoCopeNoHope
Ewen Lavoie is a PhD Candidate and a Faculty Member of Kinesiology, Sport, and Recreation at the Neuroscience and Mental Health Institute of the University of Alberta. He tweets @EwenLavoie.

1608031637247
 
Last edited:
Ugly men can't be happy.
 
Bastard. Chad life.
Seriously

These paragraphs in his article really show the kind of concern trolling and leaping to conclusions to demonize any future male customers of this technology.

VR sex simulation is not the same as porn. The term “VR porn” is therefore somewhat misleading. When viewing photos or videos, you experience the material through a real-world lens; you still understand that you’re in your own body in the real world. VR sex simulation, using the principles of embodiment manipulation, supplants a person into a different body. In essence, you can become a different person, potentially acting in ways you never would in the real world.


VR sex platforms are not science fiction. There are devices on the market currently that stimulate human genitalia in synchrony with visuals and sounds from VR headsets, with much more powerful technologies in the pipeline [5]. Companies are even buying the rights to use the likeness of porn actors and actresses, creating 3D scans of their bodies for use in simulations [5,6].


With better AI, companies will no longer even require the rights to specific people. AI will generate a near-infinite number of digital sexual partners with stimuli so detailed it will be difficult to tell they’re not real people. In fact, some VR sex experiences will be designed for users to engage in acts that are impossible, socially unacceptable, and illegal in the real world.

This data is far too voluminous for human analysts, but not for AI. VR sex platforms will use algorithms that compile your data to construct sexual experiences just for you. These experiences will be fine-tuned to your current mood - they will recognize your deepest, primal urges before you do.


The implications of this are not hard to imagine. AI algorithms will quickly learn what buttons to push and when, making the experience highly addictive. Perhaps your sexual preferences could be altered by your AI companion’s suggestions. If humans have access to an infinite set of virtual partners that know what they want in any given moment, how will people’s desire to seek out sexual experiences with one another be impacted? Perhaps humans will become so accustomed to “perfected” VR sex experiences, that the thought of intimacy with another “imperfect” human won’t even be arousing.

Again the tired rationalization that sexual substitutes/copes for men are a cause of lowered formation of relationships and ultimately birth rates and not a symptom.
 
Seriously

These paragraphs in his article really show the kind of concern trolling and leaping to conclusions to demonize any future male customers of this technology.





Again the tired rationalization that sexual substitutes/copes for men are a cause of lowered formation of relationships and ultimately birth rates and not a symptom.

Last paragraph of yours are the problems of women and solely women. Not incel men.
 
They really want us to be asexual, homosexual or dead.

They simply can't allow us to have any enjoyment of any heterosexual sexual feeling whatsoever can they?
 
aye

They will say all men rapists, who can never stop sexually harassing foids and that we are constantly horny but then they'll say we never leave the basement and watch porn and play video games all day :feelsclown:
Meanwhile they'll advocate for restricting/banning sexual outlets like porn, prostitution, sexdolls and virtual reality so that ugly men are completely disoriented, confused, helpless, full of rage and ready to fight other people's battles instead of clearly focusing on their self interests.
 
Of course it is always the sexhavers who can't even do NNN who want to ban porn for us, and do you think for a second that government committees will actually think of the effects of banning porn? no they won't, they can't think what is like to be us from a mental pov
Imo one earlier commenter on this site came to the realization that it's probably so that ugly men become so full of pent up rage so that they are useful to do the bidding of hostile people that want to use them.
That's why a lot of far left and far right political activists are against copes for ugly men.
 
They are not consciously doing that
Some of them are tbh
You can see it in their disdain for men just coping and not taking action in the streets or through violence to further their causes.
Such people want ugly men bereft of copes so they are more suggestible to being exploited.
 
they keep pushing these norms on us and then when one of us snaps suddenly its our fault fuck them
 
Meanwhile they'll advocate for restricting/banning sexual outlets like porn, prostitution, sexdolls and virtual reality so that ugly men are completely disoriented, confused, helpless, full of rage and ready to fight other people's battles instead of clearly focusing on their self interests.

True that. Hence Far Right Retards & Jihadtards (Jihtards)
Imo one earlier commenter on this site came to the realization that it's probably so that ugly men become so full of pent up rage so that they are useful to do the bidding of hostile people that want to use them.
That's why a lot of far left and far right political activists are against copes for ugly men.

Last sentence. Bullseye.
Some of them are tbh
You can see it in their disdain for men just coping and not taking action in the streets or through violence to further their causes.
Such people want ugly men bereft of copes so they are more suggestible to being exploited.

Last sentence bullseye
 
True that. Hence Far Right Retards & Jihadtards (Jihtards)
Post 9/11 there were other attacks planned where more aircraft would be hijacked but the terrorists would only kill all the men and boys onboard while leaving women and children alive.

Also religious fundmentalists are against sexual copes for ugly men more often than not.



 
They really want us to be asexual, homosexual or dead.
Every incel needs to realize this.
The biggest problem with sexbots and dolls is that most of the work is being done is by solo guys on patreon and discords, not actual companies.

(((They))) are literally preventing like minded people from gathering together to profitably produce goods and services that have no negative social impact.
 
Seriously

These paragraphs in his article really show the kind of concern trolling and leaping to conclusions to demonize any future male customers of this technology.





Again the tired rationalization that sexual substitutes/copes for men are a cause of lowered formation of relationships and ultimately birth rates and not a symptom.
Even if they were the cause, women are not entitled to men chasing them instead of robots.
 
Even if they were the cause, women are not entitled to men chasing them instead of robots.
True but society's expectations are structured that way and they feel entitled to enforcing that on the sexless male population.
 
True but society's expectations are structured that way and they feel entitled to enforcing that on the sexless male population.
entitlements are their delusions.
 
Their delusions that are still nonetheless very real and that bring effects on the lives of incels and unsuccessful low status males at large.
I don't think they can do much to stop sex robots tbh, people will literally move to countries where they allow them, like Japan or even curryland.
 
I don't think they can do much to stop sex robots tbh, people will literally move to countries where they allow them, like Japan or even curryland.
They can do a lot to stop sex robotics. Import bans, installation of consent modules or notification systems that alert police when an improper procedure is performed on them and so on.

Virtual reality is still much harder to police but from this article there appears to be a few people trying to go there.
Also Japan is a way batter example of a haven.

Such technology will be banned in countries like India.
India will probably be on the of the worst places to be a low status sexually unsuccessful male for much of this century if current indications continue.
Even most western MRAs think it's mostly women that are treated badly in India and that men's rights issues of any kind aren't really that existent there.
 
They can do a lot to stop sex robotics. Import bans, installation of consent modules or notification systems that alert police when an improper procedure is performed on them and so on.

Virtual reality is still much harder to police but from this article there appears to be a few people trying to go there.
Also Japan is a way batter example of a haven.

Such technology will be banned in countries like India.
India will probably be on the of the worst places to be a low status sexually unsuccessful male for much of this century if current indications continue.
Even most western MRAs think it's mostly women that are treated badly in India and that men's rights issues of any kind aren't really that existent there.
If you ban sex robots, there will be literall outrage and a huge black market. If people see others getting arrested for it, people will be outraged at the police for it.
Consent modules are retarded, you can just jailbreak it. Also, it's supposed to be a toy, if they instal consent modules, then that will imply there is an algorithm to be able to get into her pants, and make men think there's an algorithm to get into women's pants as well. There's so many arguments as to why that argument by feminists will never be taken seriously. Although government regulators don't care about logic or reasoning, they are pandering faggots most of the time. If someone does try to restrict it, I hope their sons all become incels.
 
If you ban sex robots, there will be literall outrage and a huge black market. If people see others getting arrested for it, people will be outraged at the police for it.
Among some but people who ban sex robots know most people that object are all talk and will fall in line.
Consent modules are retarded, you can just jailbreak it. Also, it's supposed to be a toy, if they instal consent modules, then that will imply there is an algorithm to be able to get into her pants, and make men think there's an algorithm to get into women's pants as well.
That won't stop them from trying if there's enough media outrage about how consent modules aren't a thing.
There's so many arguments as to why that argument by feminists will never be taken seriously. Although government regulators don't care about logic or reasoning, they are pandering faggots most of the time. If someone does try to restrict it, I hope their sons all become incels.
Yeah a big problem is the government is all too eager to enforce these kinds of things.
Look at bills in the US like the CREEPER act
 
If you ban sex robots, there will be literall outrage and a huge black market. If people see others getting arrested for it, people will be outraged at the police for it.
Fuck being outraged. Imagine that they were trying to stop you from being able to find some kinda peace and happiness with a bot. I would just fucking leave.
 
Among some but people who ban sex robots know most people that object are all talk and will fall in line.
That's what happened with drugs as well.

That won't stop them from trying if there's enough media outrage about how consent modules aren't a thing.
Don't think this specific part will ever be a thing, robot designers aren't going to waste their time on their own.
I really hope the media gets nuked, they're deceitful low iq morons. Not even joking, I think most people in media are dub af.

Yeah a big problem is the government is all too eager to enforce these kinds of things.
Look at bills in the US like the CREEPER act
Goverment does whatever it can to gain more power.
However, the supreme court had struck down at people trying to ban lolli art, but idk what will happen with this.
Not that it matters, lollis don't look attractive to me.
Fuck being outraged. Imagine that they were trying to stop you from being able to find some kinda peace and happiness with a bot. I would just fucking leave.
vote with your feet, move to another country at that point
 
That's what happened with drugs as well.


Don't think this specific part will ever be a thing, robot designers aren't going to waste their time on their own.
I really hope the media gets nuked, they're deceitful low iq morons. Not even joking, I think most people in media are dub af.
The media and people that believe them (even the alt-right still kind of does because whoever the media demonizes like MRAs and mgtows they try to recruit) is one of the ultimate enemies of incels and low status unsuccessful males.
They should get back to reporting on policy issues instead of concern trolling about identity politics and writing clickbait articles to enrage and further divide people.
It's moral panics and editorials theorizing about incels and the copes of low status males that have been responsible for a lot of the hatred drummed up against low status males in general in the last few years. Even before gamergate.
This shit started getting really bad during the Great Recession.
Remember Hannah Rosin's article The End of Men? They were cheering the downfall of men.
Government does whatever it can to gain more power.
However, the supreme court had struck down at people trying to ban lolli art, but idk what will happen with this.
Not that it matters, lollis don't look attractive to me.
These are judges we are talking about lol.
What has been the history of judges ruling on issues? They favor women.
Look at the cases against selective service that were dismissed in World War I by the Supreme Court.
 
The media and people that believe them (even the alt-right still kind of does because whoever the media demonizes like MRAs and mgtows they try to recruit) is one of the ultimate enemies of incels and low status unsuccessful males.
They should get back to reporting on policy issues instead of concern trolling about identity politics and writing clickbait articles to enrage and further divide people.
It's moral panics and editorials theorizing about incels and the copes of low status males that have been responsible for a lot of the hatred drummed up against low status males in general in the last few years. Even before gamergate.
This shit started getting really bad during the Great Recession.
Remember Hannah Rosin's article The End of Men? They were cheering the downfall of men.
The media is mostly not believed in by the general public. It's probably even higher percentage among younger people.
They can't go back to reporting actual news because no one watches their bullshit UNLESS they bait people to clicking their site
Editorials should never be taken seriously, but fear mongering does work despite people not trusting in the media. Self preservation is primal and invoking fears can override people's ability to reason when they are presented information.
And I don't remember End of Men.
 
The media is mostly not believed in by the general public. It's probably even higher percentage among younger people.
Not necessarily among younger people. Social media like twitter and reddit is filling the void.
They can't go back to reporting actual news because no one watches their bullshit UNLESS they bait people to clicking their site
Their fault for lying so much about foreign affairs.
Also the excuse they give is that nobody would watch their bullshit without them targeting the general populace and make "entertainment" articles mocking the common citizen to fill ad and attention spce?
That's a failed business then and not doing its job. It should go out of business.
Editorials should never be taken seriously, but fear mongering does work despite people not trusting in the media. Self preservation is primal and invoking fears can override people's ability to reason when they are presented information.
Yeah and low status ugly male have always been a scapegoat throughout history and people will selectively believe things they read that conform with their preconceived bias and simply ignore the rest that doesn't. People are unfortunately not purely rational actors.
And I don't remember End of Men.
The Atlantic is one of the most hostile media outlets to low status struggling men from what I've noticed tbh
 
Not necessarily among younger people. Social media like twitter and reddit is filling the void.
I know people here pay a lot of attention to reddit, but I neve heard of it before I joined this forum tbh

Their fault for lying so much about foreign affairs.
Also the excuse they give is that nobody would watch their bullshit without them targeting the general populace and make "entertainment" articles mocking the common citizen to fill ad and attention spce?
That's a failed business then and not doing its job. It should go out of business.
Exactly, they should fail but they refuse to die and are producing trash and mass produce garbage to stay afloat.
Yeah and low status ugly male have always been a scapegoat throughout history and people will selectively believe things they read that conform with their preconceived bias and simply ignore the rest that doesn't. People are unfortunately not purely rational actors.
yep, and no one naturally has sympathy for males. We are like the worker ants in a colony, all they want from us is to be a slave and build shit for them.

The Atlantic is one of the most hostile media outlets to low status struggling men from what I've noticed tbh
never heard of the atlantic tbh. that article is ridiculous tough JFL, men build everything in society and pay most the taxes. Women can't build civilizations, they are meant to live in caves.
 
I know people here pay a lot of attention to reddit, but I neve heard of it before I joined this forum tbh
Unfortunately even if we abstain from those sites it doesn't mean others will. And their view is very much shaped by the news feed and articles pinned on those sites.
Ultimately some of the decisions they make with that information then affects us.
never heard of the atlantic tbh. that article is ridiculous tough JFL, men build everything in society and pay most the taxes. Women can't build civilizations, they are meant to live in caves.
It's essentially celebrating hardships men face and their decline/how the average man won't be needed but in a roundabout sly sounding kind of way that people in the media are fond of doing.
 
Unfortunately even if we abstain from those sites it doesn't mean others will. And their view is very much shaped by the news feed and articles pinned on those sites.
Ultimately some of the decisions they make with that information then affects us.
tech censorship is a huge problem, the tech giants are colluding with one another. Many in the government is too stupid to know how these sectors operate.
I don't like alex jones (hes a zion cuck), but he got banned on every platform at once. This has happened to many people.

It's essentially celebrating hardships men face and their decline/how the average man won't be needed but in a roundabout sly sounding kind of way that people in the media are fond of doing.
Imagine if someone wrote an article like this about women.....JFL.
They would have died of starvation cause they would have never found another job again.
 
tech censorship is a huge problem, the tech giants are colluding with one another. Many in the government is too stupid to know how these sectors operate.
I don't like alex jones (hes a zion cuck), but he got banned on every platform at once. This has happened to many people.
Alex Jones as he himself said was just the test run.
And yes tech censorship is very much stacking the favor for political parties and groups that tech companies and their current culture favor.

Even the younger people in government that do know how these sectors operate still have a sort of optimism and trust in technology as magic panacea and means of progress. It shows in their very meager legislation against abuses by those tech monopolies.
Imagine if someone wrote an article like this about women.....JFL.
they would have never found another job again.
That should happen to the people that wrote this article falsely trying to tie men that oppose sex specific conscription with rightwing extremism and incels
 
Alex Jones as he himself said was just the test run.
And yes tech censorship is very much stacking the favor for political parties and groups that tech companies and their current culture favor.

Even the younger people in government that do know how these sectors operate still have a sort of optimism and trust in technology as magic panacea and means of progress. It shows in their very meager legislation against abuses by those tech monopolies.
Did you see that Joe Biden's campaign hired a bunch of ex google and other tech sector employees.
Classic corruption, they helped him win, now he gives them power.

That should happen to the people that wrote this article falsely trying to tie men that oppose sex specific conscription with rightwing extremism and incels
"Such narratives are already visible in online communities. A case in point in Singapore is the dissatisfaction of losing girls to white immigrants. Others take on a slightly different but equally misogynistic flavour, such as the sentiment of how military conscription sets men back in their career whilst self-serving and career-minded women are given a step ahead to advance in life. This sense of male victimhood is something which is universal and could find resonance and manifest violently in an Asian context through something that might look like Incel violence."
brootal rice mogging casually gets brought up. Also, singapore is gigacucked, being forced in the military is actual being victimized.
 
Did you see that Joe Biden's campaign hired a bunch of ex google and other tech sector employees.
Classic corruption, they helped him win, now he gives them power.
He's a democrat. More so than many republicans, democrats have been shown to side with big tech more than ever.
It also helps that a lot of tech companies are in blue states like California.
"Such narratives are already visible in online communities. A case in point in Singapore is the dissatisfaction of losing girls to white immigrants. Others take on a slightly different but equally misogynistic flavour, such as the sentiment of how military conscription sets men back in their career whilst self-serving and career-minded women are given a step ahead to advance in life. This sense of male victimhood is something which is universal and could find resonance and manifest violently in an Asian context through something that might look like Incel violence."
brootal rice mogging casually gets brought up. Also, singapore is gigacucked, being forced in the military is actual being victimized.
Imagine someone writing about women complaining about their lack of rights being a sense of "female victimhood" in an academic journal :feelsclown:
 
Of course, all these men who weren’t reproducing did not just disappear into the ether. They cleared forests and dug ditches, plowed fields and laid bricks, their bones mixed into the mortar of civilization’s monuments. The more fortunate were sequestered into the clergy or sent away to distant posts and expeditions. Ships and caravans full of convicts, orphans, and younger sons with no chance of inheritance regularly embarked in search of new lands and wealth—many never to return. And most importantly, nearly every generation in history sent its young men to kill each other by the thousands in order to defend its frontiers—or expand them. These high-risk, high-mortality ventures, when successful, served to increase a society’s power and resources, securing an advantage for its ruling class over their neighbors and rivals.

Society wants incels either dead or enslaved, and the Chads will live in high class society with harems of women just like the Ottomans. All the signs are that this is exactly where things are heading.

If non-Chad men were to wake up and realize what's going on, that they are going extinct, they would cease power, execute all the Chads, execute all the rich, and equitably distribute the women and make adultery and polygamy punishable by death.
 
Last edited:
If non-Chad men were to wake up and realize what's going on, that they are going extinct, they would cease power, execute all the Chads, execute all the rich, and equitably distribute the women and make adultery and polygamy punishable by death.
They aren't all going extinct though because society needs those kind of men to sacrifice.
Like with how normies want a certain amount of incels around to because if incels disappeared normies would be the next to start experiencing really bad treatment. People that benefit from low status men being sacrificed want enough such men to sacrifice. They don't want them to go extinct. They just want them to have to no copes or enjoyment and ready to be used for people in power's need when those people deem it necessary, kind of unlike now where low status ugly men still have access to copes and have been able to express displeasure with women and society in response to mistreatment they still receive.
 
They aren't all going extinct though because society needs those kind of men to sacrifice.
Like with how normies want a certain amount of incels around to because if incels disappeared normies would be the next to start experiencing really bad treatment. People that benefit from low status men being sacrificed want enough such men to sacrifice. They don't want them to go extinct. They just want them to have to no copes or enjoyment and ready to be used for people in power's need when those people deem it necessary, kind of unlike now where low status ugly men still have access to copes and have been able to express displeasure with women and society in response to mistreatment they still receive.
When you don't pass your genes onto the next generation then your genetic branch is extinct. All incels who don't have children are going extinct. That doesn't mean new incels won't be born - because women with bad genes can still reproduce.
 
When you don't pass your genes onto the next generation then your genetic branch is extinct.
The "good" thing is that not all incels want to pass down their genes though
@grondilu is an example.
All incels who don't have children are going extinct.
Agreed.
That doesn't mean new incels won't be born - because women with bad genes can still reproduce.
Okay I get what you are saying by extinct.
Be assured that because some here have antinatalist leaning views after a lifetime of misery not being able to have kids is the least of their concerns.
 
ugly men cant have nice things
 

They really want us to be asexual, homosexual or dead.

They simply can't allow us to have any enjoyment of any heterosexual sexual feeling whatsoever can they?
it sounds like they want to pre-emptively euthanize us for thought crimes
 
Every incel needs to realize this.
The biggest problem with sexbots and dolls is that most of the work is being done is by solo guys on patreon and discords, not actual companies.

(((They))) are literally preventing like minded people from gathering together to profitably produce goods and services that have no negative social impact.
 

Similar threads

Shaktiman
Replies
3
Views
238
Shaktiman
Shaktiman
Shaktiman
Replies
12
Views
1K
faded
faded
GeckoBus
Replies
44
Views
1K
GeckoBus
GeckoBus

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top