E
Edmund_Kemper
Disregard my larping efforts. I can’t change it.
-
- Joined
- Sep 26, 2019
- Posts
- 25,309
Women are raped, or victims of domestic violence, and some men are misogynistic or are angry toward women. Bluepilled cucks think that most men who hate women are virgins who can't get laid and believe that chads/chick magnets respect women. Nope. Not at all. Very opposite actually. And many cucks think domestic abusers are scrawny nerds who cannot fight other men. Nope. Studies show that masculine men tend to commit domestic violence, not scrawny nerdy men.
Rapists are usually chick magnets
In a research paper called The Undetected Rapist by David Lisak, it revealed the following:
"'Undetected rapists' have consistently been shown to more sexually active than other men. Apart from their sexually aggressive behavior, they engage in consensual and coercive sex far more often than is typical for men of their age group. Their sexual activity tends to be an important component of their identities. Thus, rather than being a product of a greater sex drive, their increased sexual activity appears to be driven by their view that if they are not very active then they are neither 'successful' nor adequate as men."
Now some bluepilled cuck might argue "silly little inkwell don't you know that they only have lots of sex to be adequate as men? " but the thing is is that many men who try to be extremely sexually active probably won't be that sexually active, and either will remain incel or will just be moderately sexually active. i'm sure many chads have lots of sex for this reason, given the pressure to have sex among men in society. So if rapists succeed at being much more sexually active than most men, then they're clearly chick magnet chads. The rapist's reason for having so many sex partners/dating partners is irrelevant to the fact that they have that many partners.
In the book Rape Investigation Handbook by John O. Savino and Brent E. Turvey, they showed studies showing how many rapists attract women and are sexually active with many women. "Groth (1979, p. 5) dispels the myth of the predominance of 'loner' and socially outcast rapists by explaining that 'one third of the offenders that we worked with were married and sexually active with their wives at the time of their assaults. . . . Of those offenders who were not married (that is, single, seperated, or divorced), the majority were actively involved in a variety of consenting sexual relationships with other persons at the time of their offenses." Also, "furthermore, Groth and Hobson (1983, p. 161), who studied 1,000 offenders over a 16-year period, found the following: 'All of the offenders we have seen were sexually active males involved in consensual relationships at the time of their offense. No one raped because he had no other outlet for his sexual needs."
I also have read that college athletes and frat boys are significantly more likely to perpetrate rape, sexual assault, or sexual coercion. 1 in 3 college rapes is done by a college athlete. Another study showed college athletes in a uni being responsible for 19% of sexual assaults and 35% of domestic assaults despite being only about 3% of the student population. Another study showed that 54% of college athletes reported perpetrating some form of sexual coercion. Sorority girls are also more likely to be victims of rape than other college girls. Frat boys are 3x more likely or 300% more likely to rape women. Frat boys and college athletes tend to be chick magnets. I also read that college men who played aggressive sports in HS (also chads) are more likely to commit domestic violence or psychological relationship in college dating relationships, are more likely to commit sexual coercion, are more hostile toward women and more sexist and accepting of violence and believe more in rape myth acceptance.
I also read studies (that i can't remember the names of) where it revealed that rapists often lose their virginity at an early age, have their first date at an early age, have a much higher number of sex partners, and have a higher number of dating partners.
Tough guys and strong men usually commit domestic violence, not scrawny nerdy men
*Domestic violence is one of the most common crimes of professional athletes, including football players and wrestlers/fighters. look at ray rice, stone cold steve austin, floyd mayweather, greg hardy, dan wilkinson, etc.
*Muscular men actually are more likely to be aggressive and more likely to be experienced in physical violence and this stereotype is true
*Men focused on being muscular are more "misogynistic".
*A lot of the domestic abusers i saw on google images look pretty strong.
*Hypermasculinity (aka emphasis on being as manly as possible, physical strength, and emphasis on aggression) often causes physical and sexual aggression towards women.
*I read a study that men who conform to masculine stereotypes and masculine norms/traditions are more likely to beat their intimate partner. Men who don't care about being manly are less likely to beat their intimate partner.
*Domestic violence is a problem in the military (and so is sexual assault). People in the military are tough and very strong. Sexual assault/rape is also a big issue in the military.
Chick magnets are far more misogynistic, study says
In a study of 2,703 teenagers in Spain ages 14 to 20 (M=15.89; SD=1.29), including 1,350 teenage boys (M = 15.95; SD = 1.30) and 1,353 teenage girls (M = 15.83; SD = 1.28), researchers found a very strong correlation between sexism and sexual and romantic success. The study revealed that sexually active teenage boys have more benevolent sexism, more hostile sexism, and more ambivalent sexism than non-sexually active teenage boys. Additionally, benevolently sexist men had their first sex at an earlier age and hostile sexist men had a lower proportion of condom use. The study also revealed that women are attracted to benevolently sexist men. The study revealed that teenage boys without sexual experience had the least amount of hostile sexism, benevolent sexism and ambivalent sexism. Boys with non-penetrative sexual experience had more of the three types of sexism, and boys with penetrative sexual experience had the most amount of the three types of sexism. I know this only focuses on teenage boys, but honestly people in their 20s these days still act like teenagers. People don't become mature nowadays until their 30s.
Conclusion:
People think that most misogynistic men cannot get laid, are virgins or get rejected by women. Nope. Very opposite is true. Virgins who hate women are rare, they're just the type the media emphasizes. Yes we all hear about the nice guys who complain about women, or people on this forum who are incels, but virgins like us are only like 1% of virgins. We are just emphasized by social media while most sexist men are swept under the rug. The reason we don't hear about chick magnets criticizing women online is because chick magnets usually hide their misogyny and don't post too much on social media/forums because they're busy socializing IRL while virgin men are more likely to type or rant online because they might be socially withdrawn. Virgin men as a result might express their feelings online more and rant more online, which is why we hear about misogynistic virgins, even though they're a rare type of virgin. Statistics show that virgin men are less sexist and chick magnets are more sexist. i rely more on what statistics say than what the media/internet says. the media/internet always emphasizes the rare stuff while the usual stuff is swept under the rug. People often think domestic abusers beat their GF because she's vulnerable. Nope. if that was true, then why are gay men just as likely to be domestic abusers? i read that domestic abusers usually do it for many reasons, they might feel jealous toward her because she has a more successful background, they worry she is cheating or might leave him, they want to control what she does or what happens in the relationship, anger issues, etc. these are their motives. it has nothing to do with her being vulnerable.
normies and cucks like to emphasize virgin men or scrawny nerdy sub5 manlets as the perpetrators of misogyny and aggression against women because virgin men and sub5 men are easy targets for ridicule while chick magnets and big muscular men are difficult to ridicule.
Rapists are usually chick magnets
In a research paper called The Undetected Rapist by David Lisak, it revealed the following:
"'Undetected rapists' have consistently been shown to more sexually active than other men. Apart from their sexually aggressive behavior, they engage in consensual and coercive sex far more often than is typical for men of their age group. Their sexual activity tends to be an important component of their identities. Thus, rather than being a product of a greater sex drive, their increased sexual activity appears to be driven by their view that if they are not very active then they are neither 'successful' nor adequate as men."
Now some bluepilled cuck might argue "silly little inkwell don't you know that they only have lots of sex to be adequate as men? " but the thing is is that many men who try to be extremely sexually active probably won't be that sexually active, and either will remain incel or will just be moderately sexually active. i'm sure many chads have lots of sex for this reason, given the pressure to have sex among men in society. So if rapists succeed at being much more sexually active than most men, then they're clearly chick magnet chads. The rapist's reason for having so many sex partners/dating partners is irrelevant to the fact that they have that many partners.
In the book Rape Investigation Handbook by John O. Savino and Brent E. Turvey, they showed studies showing how many rapists attract women and are sexually active with many women. "Groth (1979, p. 5) dispels the myth of the predominance of 'loner' and socially outcast rapists by explaining that 'one third of the offenders that we worked with were married and sexually active with their wives at the time of their assaults. . . . Of those offenders who were not married (that is, single, seperated, or divorced), the majority were actively involved in a variety of consenting sexual relationships with other persons at the time of their offenses." Also, "furthermore, Groth and Hobson (1983, p. 161), who studied 1,000 offenders over a 16-year period, found the following: 'All of the offenders we have seen were sexually active males involved in consensual relationships at the time of their offense. No one raped because he had no other outlet for his sexual needs."
I also have read that college athletes and frat boys are significantly more likely to perpetrate rape, sexual assault, or sexual coercion. 1 in 3 college rapes is done by a college athlete. Another study showed college athletes in a uni being responsible for 19% of sexual assaults and 35% of domestic assaults despite being only about 3% of the student population. Another study showed that 54% of college athletes reported perpetrating some form of sexual coercion. Sorority girls are also more likely to be victims of rape than other college girls. Frat boys are 3x more likely or 300% more likely to rape women. Frat boys and college athletes tend to be chick magnets. I also read that college men who played aggressive sports in HS (also chads) are more likely to commit domestic violence or psychological relationship in college dating relationships, are more likely to commit sexual coercion, are more hostile toward women and more sexist and accepting of violence and believe more in rape myth acceptance.
I also read studies (that i can't remember the names of) where it revealed that rapists often lose their virginity at an early age, have their first date at an early age, have a much higher number of sex partners, and have a higher number of dating partners.
Tough guys and strong men usually commit domestic violence, not scrawny nerdy men
*Domestic violence is one of the most common crimes of professional athletes, including football players and wrestlers/fighters. look at ray rice, stone cold steve austin, floyd mayweather, greg hardy, dan wilkinson, etc.
*Muscular men actually are more likely to be aggressive and more likely to be experienced in physical violence and this stereotype is true
*Men focused on being muscular are more "misogynistic".
*A lot of the domestic abusers i saw on google images look pretty strong.
*Hypermasculinity (aka emphasis on being as manly as possible, physical strength, and emphasis on aggression) often causes physical and sexual aggression towards women.
*I read a study that men who conform to masculine stereotypes and masculine norms/traditions are more likely to beat their intimate partner. Men who don't care about being manly are less likely to beat their intimate partner.
*Domestic violence is a problem in the military (and so is sexual assault). People in the military are tough and very strong. Sexual assault/rape is also a big issue in the military.
Chick magnets are far more misogynistic, study says
In a study of 2,703 teenagers in Spain ages 14 to 20 (M=15.89; SD=1.29), including 1,350 teenage boys (M = 15.95; SD = 1.30) and 1,353 teenage girls (M = 15.83; SD = 1.28), researchers found a very strong correlation between sexism and sexual and romantic success. The study revealed that sexually active teenage boys have more benevolent sexism, more hostile sexism, and more ambivalent sexism than non-sexually active teenage boys. Additionally, benevolently sexist men had their first sex at an earlier age and hostile sexist men had a lower proportion of condom use. The study also revealed that women are attracted to benevolently sexist men. The study revealed that teenage boys without sexual experience had the least amount of hostile sexism, benevolent sexism and ambivalent sexism. Boys with non-penetrative sexual experience had more of the three types of sexism, and boys with penetrative sexual experience had the most amount of the three types of sexism. I know this only focuses on teenage boys, but honestly people in their 20s these days still act like teenagers. People don't become mature nowadays until their 30s.
Conclusion:
People think that most misogynistic men cannot get laid, are virgins or get rejected by women. Nope. Very opposite is true. Virgins who hate women are rare, they're just the type the media emphasizes. Yes we all hear about the nice guys who complain about women, or people on this forum who are incels, but virgins like us are only like 1% of virgins. We are just emphasized by social media while most sexist men are swept under the rug. The reason we don't hear about chick magnets criticizing women online is because chick magnets usually hide their misogyny and don't post too much on social media/forums because they're busy socializing IRL while virgin men are more likely to type or rant online because they might be socially withdrawn. Virgin men as a result might express their feelings online more and rant more online, which is why we hear about misogynistic virgins, even though they're a rare type of virgin. Statistics show that virgin men are less sexist and chick magnets are more sexist. i rely more on what statistics say than what the media/internet says. the media/internet always emphasizes the rare stuff while the usual stuff is swept under the rug. People often think domestic abusers beat their GF because she's vulnerable. Nope. if that was true, then why are gay men just as likely to be domestic abusers? i read that domestic abusers usually do it for many reasons, they might feel jealous toward her because she has a more successful background, they worry she is cheating or might leave him, they want to control what she does or what happens in the relationship, anger issues, etc. these are their motives. it has nothing to do with her being vulnerable.
normies and cucks like to emphasize virgin men or scrawny nerdy sub5 manlets as the perpetrators of misogyny and aggression against women because virgin men and sub5 men are easy targets for ridicule while chick magnets and big muscular men are difficult to ridicule.
Last edited: