Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

RageFuel Swedish women talking about their number of sex partners

Without Jews this wouldn’t happen because of the forced monogamy and conservative social attitudes.

Women are like dogs or animals, it’s their nature to do these things but the white man for hundreds of years had the muzzle on them better than anyone else. even Arabs thought we were misogynistic when the British came to Egypt and eliminated female financial independence.
cope, they were still cheating on beta buck husband for chad seed.
Female dual mating strategy existed long before Jews did.
Just look at the comparisons between family lineages and genetic testing in the last 500 years of Europeans, there is an average discrepancy of 10%, which means 10% of males got cucked.

The only difference between now and then is that men know what's going on now. Back then everyone was a bluepilled cuck (except Chad).
 
The clan of the XX is Degenerate af
it needs a cleansing at haste!
 
What happens when you let a dog eat as much chocolate as it wants?
I don't like comparing animals with foids. Animals are pure, sinless. There is no evil in them.

Or even when you yourself drink non stop, or eat non stop, or exercise non stop?
The body can only take so much.

Health aside, there are social consequences as well.
Foids believe they are in a free buffet.
But it is paid for by the normie tax-paying cattle, and us wage-slaves, unwillingly through the theft of our taxes.

But we can't pay forever. The system, such as it is today, is not self sustainable.
Foids don't know what that consequence is, or they know but ignore it. But it will come to them.

The end of foid rights is an economical, almost mathematic, fact.
Foids are under the delusion that Chads, weak cucked men, normies and/or even us Incels will protect them from the consequences of their actions.

The truth is, even if we wanted to, it's impossible to shield them from the consequences of their actions.
Foids will lose their rights and become property again, and the ones that will take it away will be the foids themselves. Knowingly or not.
Great analogies. Women themselves are unhappier than ever, because fun does not equal happiness. They have the fun of their lives having sex with tons of guys but end up feeling used and miserable, become fat feminist fucks that no one is able to love, and eventually end up as lonely cat women right when hitting the wall in their late thirties and fourties, living in an apartment, advocating for raising the age of consent to 35 so that someone is forced to bang their roastie cunts.
 
cope, they were still cheating on beta buck husband for chad seed.
Female dual mating strategy existed long before Jews did.
Just look at the comparisons between family lineages and genetic testing in the last 500 years of Europeans, there is an average discrepancy of 10%, which means 10% of males got cucked.

The only difference between now and then is that men know what's going on now. Back then everyone was a bluepilled cuck (except Chad).
Cope there were adultery laws and shit back then. The 10% discrepancy just means some of it can’t be measured which makes sense
 
Fukcing degenerates fuuuuuuucccvvvkkkkkkkkkk
 
The 10% discrepancy just means some of it can’t be measured which makes sense
Cope
 
There are such things that existed as bastard child’s but 10% is too implausible. even now that’s an insane number and I wouldn’t believe it.
You are bluepilled.
 
You are bluepilled.
That 10% of families have no biological connection to their children? Now it is plausible but back then there was such heavy scrutiny and punishment by the law for being caught that it'd be too much of a deterrant. Especially because ancestry dna can and has been lost and isn't a good way to distinguish family trees.

Now in some countries it's 10%? believable.

in 1400 10% of children weren't related to their father directly? No.
 
That 10% of families have no biological connection to their children? Now it is plausible but back then there was such heavy scrutiny and punishment by the law for being caught that it'd be too much of a deterrant. Especially because ancestry dna can and has been lost and isn't a good way to distinguish family trees.

Now in some countries it's 10%? believable.

in 1400 10% of children weren't related to their father directly? No.
It was more common in the past because there was no birth control pills and now women can get caught with genetic testing
Back then the man just had to believe the kid is his with 0 evidence and the entire community would require proof from him that she slept around if he had any suspicions. It was more common in the past, women were always whores.
 
This makes me boil with rage, those vile whores.
 

Similar threads

27yearcel
Replies
2
Views
148
27yearcel
27yearcel
over_for_me
Replies
13
Views
514
LeFrenchCel
LeFrenchCel
Seahorsecel
Replies
6
Views
251
faded
faded

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top