Europe and America are very different sets of values, despite people such as the humanists exalting such values as “universal”. thinking it so. we are nothing alike in terms of how we approach economics, sociology, philosophy, history, science, etc albeit even if the latter is exercising a great deal of influence on the former in recent history. There will always be some perspectives that are unique to the European experience, as well as ones unique to America and the rest of the English speaking world insomuch a shared consensus on outlooks and worldviews and viewpoints can hardly be breached. If you so as much understand this, then you cannot compare the experiences of someone from a place like Nice, France or Gdansk, Poland or Barcelona, Spain or hell, Copenhagen, Denmark to the experiences of someone from Duluth, Minnesota or Billings, North Dakota or even Seattle, Washington and if we're stretching the meaning of America to include Canada, Edmonton or Alberta, with the possible exception of Quebec's uniquely continental heritage that bears more than a striking resemblance to European "lived experience". We must come to agreement that our worldview is mostly shaped by environmental factors outside of our control, despite individuals being able to exhibit, and some may disagree, a semblance of control of our immediate surroundings.
Beauty has never been universal if one actually studies other cultures. But most of us rarely step outside our doorstep so we are mostly unaware of that fact. Certain countries value certain aspects of the female anatomy. For instance, in the English speaking world large breasts mean the woman is able to feed her children. In our minds this triggers a response that immediately gives us sexual interest in said female. In other cultures, the backside of woman is more prominent. As one might assume, the United states seems to favor the backside of females due to the large amount of negroids that live among us, with the exception of Romania, Kazakhstan, Mongolia, and possibly Chile, the more Africanized a population is, the more backsides are valued over breasts. Further inquiry into empirical evidence might show that that different aspects of the female anatomy might be able to trigger responses in respective males almost down to even local factors, making sure that notions of beauty are never as cut and dry as it might seem. Even so, it might be up the individual preferences of differing heterosexual males to what triggers endorphin responses in the mental faculties of men, however a few generalizations can be made in regards to race and culture, and no man is a vacuum opposite of his respective nation, creed, or racial makeup.
These rules can be more seen as suggestions, rather than concrete rules and laws that determine aesthetic beauty of any female a man could (and should) place in his desire, as a way of contributing to the gene pool and producing children who more or less exhibit half of his personal individual preferences on the mental and physical characteristics of his offspring, and the other half being determined by his tribe, which together should combine to form the end goal of his “desiring”.
If man is to produce the most efficient offspring, he must deduce his desires into what is useful for future generations, and discard what is not. This is the teleology of the pragmatic project, which in order for a community, then a state, then a nation, until this becomes the accepted project of the entire world-system, must aim for maximum efficiency. That means the casting off of odd fetishes and behaviors that damn man to to the level of beasts, mental states notwithstanding, as we must also mentally aim for man’s inner soul, while attempting to simultaneously direct it towards usefulness and purpose, to create a dual system of “instinctual pragmatism” which curiously, is at the heart of the autistic soul. This system must never be abandoned in favor of a “tabula rasa idealism” which is so common in the works of a John Locke, whose style of thinking was a reducto ad absurdum of the human experience, an experience where everything that can be seen, is reduced to atomic individualism, whose life force only extends as far as one can sense it.
Genetic fitness should attain at its final stage, a world project, which ironically would be set in motion by the very mindset most past forms sought to eliminate, which is the autistic view that everything is done because its part of one’s inner essence and unfolds in a very predictable, calculated way that if anyone were to interrupt this process, like an adult would try to interrupt the rituals of an autistic child, would prove to be very damaging to those that exists outside the child’s consciousness, for better or worse. The modern world is doing precisely that, with its allusions towards sexual fetishes and abnormal parenting methods which I will not get into here, as I’m inclined to believe the reader knows quite well at which monstrosities I’m aiming towards. But now, everyone is seeing the fits and tantrums of the world play out in real time, and this will not end unless we direct our telos towards the inner and practical.
