L
lifefuel
Banned
-
- Joined
- Nov 12, 2017
- Posts
- 462
- Online
- 13d 34m
The only ER they're afraid of is when non-chads get blackpilled and refuse to be their cogs in their degeneracy wheel.Just remember the FBI isn't scared of us individually. Most of us don't have the balls or means to go ER.
They are scared of our idea of the blackpill spreading. That actually has a chance to fuck up the system
1. Why way back machine? Did original get taken down?
Damn, the users here are high IQThe author gets paid for the amount of times people click on his article (hence the term "clickbait") and the website gets more attention from search engine algorithms for the number of unique IPs visiting it. Neither one gets anything when you view the archived page on the wayback machine.
well saidIf you're being radicalized by data, you're in fact being radicalized by objective reality, meaning everyone else is being lulled by falsehoods.
If you're being radicalized by data, you're in fact being radicalized by objective reality, meaning everyone else is being lulled by falsehoods.
They pretty much call anyone who remotely disagrees with the status quo "radicalised" at this point.
high iqIf you're being radicalized by data, you're in fact being radicalized by objective reality, meaning everyone else is being lulled by falsehoods.
I love how the article initially talks about normies (the guy who compiled the data was probably a chadlite though), but then immediately turns it into bashing incels.
99/1 rule confirmed.Sam*, a member of the r/Tinderdata thread, also shared vague statistics with me: “According to data from Tinder, they found that less than 1 per cent of men are actually getting a significant match to date conversation ratio.
JFL the state of tinder for men, I get one date with 1,5/10 foid, she ghosted me after.Ive been on tinder for 2 and a half years now as well, still not 1 date
If you're being radicalized by data, you're in fact being radicalized by objective reality, meaning everyone else is being lulled by falsehoods.
JFL the state of tinder for men, I get one date with 1,5/10 foid, she ghosted me after.
JFL a 1,5/10 foid have more SVM than me x100(at least).
I used tinder for 4 - 6 months
"In a community of online men who are often introverted and more comfortable with numeric fact than more abstract demonstrations of emotion, these Tinder graphs provide immediate reassurance."
The lengths academics will go to deny reality. Feels over reals. Of course I am more comfortable with provable data over some bullshit emotional landscape where I get constantly gaslit and told I'm a monster.
It's basically like the old saying if you tell a big enough lie then people will believe it, just like how foids like to preach that looks don't matter and its all about personality, which is complete and utter bullshit.If you're being radicalized by data, you're in fact being radicalized by objective reality, meaning everyone else is being lulled by falsehoods.
Kaitlyn Regehr, professor of media at Kent University, who specialises in Incel culture.
The media is beginning to freak out because tinder is blackpilling men
Those ITcels brainlets are missing one critical point: MEN NEVER PRETEND LIKE THEY CARE ABOUT THE PERSONALITY OF A WOMAN IF ALL THEY WANNA DO IS BANG HERSoycuck and rostie comments:
View attachment 188301
![]()
What kind of cuck thinks jodi arias looks good? I've never heard of men having serial killer fetishes but we've heard it with foids.
Another thing missing is because many men are thirsty and would fuck anything these days. If men had more options and were mentally healthy they would only go nuts about submissive teenage virgins, not post wall psychopathic murderers.Those ITcels brainlets are missing one critical point: MEN NEVER PRETEND LIKE THEY CARE ABOUT THE PERSONALITY OF A WOMAN IF ALL THEY WANNA DO IS BANG HER
Women are the ones parroting the pursonalitee bullshit
Of course notYou expected honestly and logic out of the foid in that article?
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
How she ghosted me: the men being radicalised by Tinder data
Over a period of two and a half years, Michael* looked for a girlfriend on the dating app Tinder. The app showed him thousands of women. In fact, Michael knows exactly how many women he swiped yes to: 4,373 out of 9,103. Fifty-four of these women said yes back, of which 11 agreed to dates. Out...web.archive.org
It's just becoming harder and harder for them to ignore than data now that clearly shows men are held to significantly higher standards than women. and JFL at them trying to frame it as men being mad about getting ghosted (in an attempt to make it seem like it was something they said rather than looks), the reality is most men don't even get any matches to get ghosted by in the first place.
Female nature is the same everywhere in the world, even in the remotest locations. I'm speaking from actual experience.I tried it pretty much around the globe. I believed I was a location cell. Spoiler alert : I'm not
.If you're being radicalized by data, you're in fact being radicalized by objective reality, meaning everyone else is being lulled by falsehoods.
So do I tbh.I'm speaking from actual experience.
They're way cheaper in SEasia, so you'll make up the money for the plane ticket if you stay there and escortmax long enough.So do I tbh.
SEAmaxxing in particular is a cope unless you're fine with paying for whores, but then there is no point in going so far across the globe
escortmax
Who is 'the media'? Only one publication?
Exactly fucking this.The only ER they're afraid of is when non-chads get blackpilled and refuse to be their cogs in their degeneracy wheel.
brutal monkeypill hard to swallow tbh50% of all male monkeys NEVER reproduce.
High IQ it happened to meThey just realized that they were living inside a bubble all along.
- The author gets paid for the amount of times people click on his article (hence the term "clickbait") and the website gets more attention from search engine algorithms for the number of unique IPs visiting it. Neither one gets anything when you view the archived page on the wayback machine.
- There's always a chance the article can be changed or deleted as a reaction to negative feedback. The archive keeps this from being a problem as you're not viewing the actual live web page.
Where is that number from? I don't doubt you just want to be able to cite it myself.50% of all male monkeys NEVER reproduce.
It should have been posted with better publications or more sources, rather than a random source and a short article that doesn't really drive any new points.Actually, this isn't the first article or comment I read that tries to explain the tinder trends.The most common explanation is that tinder hyperobjectifies both sexes and that's why most men don't get shit. It doesn't even account that the real hotties don't even go to tinder, tinder is for second-class foids who can't get hitched by just diving in a bar. So basically when I'm on Tinder I'm degrading myself hunting for whales and inhabitants of star sector cuckoo and getting constantly rejected by those as well, if they're not just fishing for a free meal.
fuark, journalists are so far gone. it's interesting that they're not even trying to argue against the blackpill and instead just trying to appeal to emotions. just disregard facts, bro!"In a community of online men who are often introverted and more comfortable with numeric fact than more abstract demonstrations of emotion, these Tinder graphs provide immediate reassurance."
![]()
How she ghosted me: the men being radicalised by Tinder data
Over a period of two and a half years, Michael* looked for a girlfriend on the dating app Tinder. The app showed him thousands of women. In fact, Michael knows exactly how many women he swiped yes to: 4,373 out of 9,103. Fifty-four of these women said yes back, of which 11 agreed to dates. Out...web.archive.org
It's just becoming harder and harder for them to ignore than data now that clearly shows men are held to significantly higher standards than women. and JFL at them trying to frame it as men being mad about getting ghosted (in an attempt to make it seem like it was something they said rather than looks), the reality is most men don't even get any matches to get ghosted by in the first place.
If you're being radicalized by data, you're in fact being radicalized by objective reality, meaning everyone else is being lulled by falsehoods.
- The author gets paid for the amount of times people click on his article (hence the term "clickbait") and the website gets more attention from search engine algorithms for the number of unique IPs visiting it. Neither one gets anything when you view the archived page on the wayback machine.
- There's always a chance the article can be changed or deleted as a reaction to negative feedback. The archive keeps this from being a problem as you're not viewing the actual live web page.