I just noticed
What?
LifeFuel The person who hacked the site has been identified, doxxed and his now terrified and offering apologies
Last edited:
So I'm gonna post that for all to see. This veteran user has been demoralized and has barely logged on to respond to me in this thread. If any user here wants to research further, his last 2+ post pages have been all to me. And by all I literally mean 100%, not 90%, but 100%, I have made him my bitch in this thread as he desperately tries to screech against the userbase in order to impose his self righteous cucked morality.
@Dregster666 I'd figure you would find this funny.
I looked at his post history a day or 2 ago and it was exactly like that
he humiliates himself like this all the time.I seriously dont get what he's arguing for when he already got dismantled by you and @PPEcel, who has a better understanding of the legal system than he does already disagreed with him as well.
I didn't say the mere act of putting the information online is a crime. I've explained where the crime comes into play, and I've explained why you're full of shit. But you can't put the two together. I think other people might be able to, but this is a conversation between you and I, you need to figure this out on your own.
D
Maxilla hypoplasia inkel
You said the crime comes into play when you make a threat to him, as you stated in this post.
But as I explained to you, no one made any threats. If this punk decides to have his mind wander toward a worst case scenario, that is on him. You are reaching and saying that because he may be scared, that a threat has been made, but that threat hasn't been made.
Similarly, the people who got DDoS'd do not owe this kid mercy in not publishing his details because there is an off chance that some crazy person will try and go after him. The only thing that is illegal is advocating for the violence.
Also worth noting that DDoS'ing is a crime, you seem to wanna try and trivialize the crime against the forums that got doxxed by calling it a mere prank, and illegitimatize the grievances of the forums.
D
His mother is a milf, I hope I can breed her one day.
I am gonna explain this to you one more time. I'm trying to be patient, but you are an exasperating person. You can't keep track of anything.
1. Doxxing with intent to menace is a crime.
2. You want doxxing to be a deterrent.
3. Doxxing without menace is not a deterrent.
4. You have put forward that doxxing without menace IS a deterrent. That people knowing who you are and that you did a DDoS is the deterrent, and that's all you want for this guy.
5. Your claim above is bullshit and you know it.
You're not trying to be patient. You are trying to push a narrative while avoiding the points I make. You sidestep the points I make because you are trying to create a narrative in order to trick others.
@PPEcel addressed this
Yes I do, not illegal
You haven't proved this to be true, from a legal standpoint, with cold cut proof. You are reaching and trying to conflate objective, legal and subjective, colloquial definitions.
Yes, I did.
I said nothing about this. This is what I mean by you "reaching".
Your claim is bullshit and you know it. In fact, you are full of shit because you decided to sidestep points I have made earlier.
No one has made threats. In the above two quotes, you have suggested scenarios with stated threats, and yet in this scenario there is no stated threats.
All five things are one point. They are the progression of this conversation, not separate points. If you don't understand that, I can't dumb it down for you any further.
They are not the same point, they are seperate points. You even numbered them seperately, why would you number them separately if they were all "one point". Perhaps because they are different points, which contains leaps.
It's not about you needing to "dumb it down", its about you being wrong, and making shitty arguments.
and you know this, bitch
You also once again are being evasive of my earlier points, (what a surprise),
No one has made threats. In the above two quotes, you have suggested scenarios with stated threats and argued those stated threats have made it illegal, and yet in this scenario there is no stated threats.
I numbered them separately because you still aren't understanding, so I broke the conversation down into its progression so you can know where we are and how we got here.
You still have evaded the point below, (again)
Alright, this made me laugh ngl
I did not evade the point, you should understand that from the way I broke the conversation down. If you can't, this is as simple as I can make it. I'm sorry. This is as far as I go.
So is this you just deciding to give up? I asked you to address the difference between colloquial and legal definitions and you sidestepped it like a little bitch (probably because you know your entire argument depends on fluid definitions).
This entire thread is you sidestepping my points repeatedly, probably 20+ times, and still getting pummeled, and ending with your throwing in the towel after a week.
And I did understand the points you were trying to make, but I addressed them and debunked them, but you didn't back them up, mainly because you couldn't.
Last edited:
Wow just saw this, so this was the fucker. Good riddance.
Cut your toenails
Cut your toenails
I ended up going back and forth with that bitch Frothy for a week and he eventually threw in the towel.
The other guy is right
I think this is one of the first times I've seen frothysolutions give up when in an argument, he's a bluepilled little manlet cuck
he looks like a retard zoomer, good day
kill thhe retard aryan piss haired wigger
i hate dutch whores, they should know we brown eyed people where here FIRST
Last edited:
Then he shouldn't attack.
I'm against hitting kids, unless they hit you first. Then slap em. They gotta learn
He is actually trying to duck out without admitting he was wrong.
Imagine playing chess with a pigeon, you make your moves, and just when you have the opponent by the balls, it knocks the pieces over, craps on the board, and flies back to its flock to claim victory.
That's what Frothy did. His argument was "if you dox and make a threat, its illegal", but then when it is pointed out that no threat is made, he tries to backpedal and twist his argument in order to avoid admitting he was wrong, and then says
So basically its just like chess with a pigeon.
Why did you crap all over the board @FrothySolutions
cant handle holding that L after wasting a week arguing another losing battle 
His mom is hot as fuck jesus, I .... CAN'T..... BREEEEED
Damn ... I didn't know @FrothySolutions was such a soy.
Bro, if you attack and DDoS a Forum which Admins pay money for, that is literally a crime.
Bragging about your criminal activities on the internet makes it even worse.
I hope this spoiled brat learned his well deserved lesson. You cannot just illegaly DDoS a Website, boast about it on the internet and think you can get away with it.
Bro, if you attack and DDoS a Forum which Admins pay money for, that is literally a crime.
Bragging about your criminal activities on the internet makes it even worse.
I hope this spoiled brat learned his well deserved lesson. You cannot just illegaly DDoS a Website, boast about it on the internet and think you can get away with it.
How new around here are you that you would think I would ever for any reason stand by a doxxing? Ever?
So you're saying you've been a cuck all these years? Color me surprised.
Yeah you're pretty new.
Frothy has a fair amount of reasonable views, also a fair amount of unreasonable views.
He's like 12 I don't see why he cares
I still see comments saying people should stop messing with him.
You know how much shit that kid would do if he found someones ip / real adress in here?
You shouldnt give a fuck what happends to normies.
You know how much shit that kid would do if he found someones ip / real adress in here?
You shouldnt give a fuck what happends to normies.
could you do everyone a favor and debunk frothy's argument that doxxing is illegal
he seems to be very assertive on this view. you're a legal expert, and you know the technicalities of whether doxxing is illegal
so please explain, in detail, why frothy is wrong on doxxing being illegal
Sucks that I can't read cursive
I'm pretty new, and you decided the flee the forum like a little bitch after I blew you out.
Still licking your wounds?
Nigga took out the ink and quill pen
View: https://youtu.be/-BwDOUbwF4E
@Diocel @pp183 @shii410 @Zettacel @Lookscel @kikecel thoughts on this absolute buffoonery?
JFL!! Nigga became George Washington
who remembers this monumental thread
You taught him a lesson he will never forget in his life
You’re such a fucking little bitch holy shit
Oh this was the DDoS incident that caused that weird database error.
What a little shit lol.
What a little shit lol.
Oldcels become more cucked because they lost all of their testosterone with age
@Ecstasy thoughts on this man's avii combined with his inherent hatred of lifeNot this one. The hate still burns within me.
Whow! Didn't see you there buddy. I was expecting a kangaroo and not Daryl@Ecstasy thoughts on this man's avii combined with his inherent hatred of life
The avi is sassy as fuck. You could expect a leftist or woyman behind it if you were just shown a screenshot of the post + avi without contect or knowing the forum. But this is by all means a compliment. Really going deep into the character he is playing. I wish him all the best
Similar threads
Users who are viewing this thread
