Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Blackpill The truth is that Israel has well over 10 000 nuclear warheads

Gnosiscel

Gnosiscel

ADONISSSSSSSSS.
★★★★★
Joined
Jan 5, 2024
Posts
390
They just are clever enough not to tell about this fact to everyone around them like other superpowers do. In fact Israel may as well be a country in possession of the biggest amount of nuclear warheads and other destructive weapons on the earth. The difference between Israel and lets say Russia or USA is that Israel has no qualms to use those weapons when the time comes to reach its preplanned goals. They may even be used in starting the apocalypse as the old Jewish propecies indicate that usage of such a deadly weaponry will happen during the end times period
 
They just are clever enough not to tell about this fact to everyone around them like other superpowers do. In fact Israel may as well be a country in possession of the biggest amount of nuclear warheads and other destructive weapons on the earth. The difference between Israel and lets say Russia or USA is that Israel has no qualms to use those weapons when the time comes to reach its preplanned goals. They may even be used in starting the apocalypse as the old Jewish propecies indicate that usage of such a deadly weaponry will happen during the end times period
Goyims must burn i guess
 
all of this huge numbers of nukes almost pointless cause the most important means of delivery is by submarine, with a large fleet of nuclear submarines carrying nuclear weapons, you have a huge advantage attacking first.
 
what is the point of having 10000 nukes, it's completely useless, 50 would destroy the entire world. Stop spewing shit out of your ass
Its to scare the masses, But as he said we dont know how many.
 
what is the point of having 10000 nukes, it's completely useless, 50 would destroy the entire world. Stop spewing shit out of your ass
50 won't cause all the nuclear weapons currently in service are not that powerful, talking about around 500 kilotons
 
all of this huge numbers of nukes almost pointless cause the most important means of delivery is by submarine, with a large fleet of nuclear submarines carrying nuclear weapons, you have a huge advantage attacking first.
Israel has means of launching nukes from space on hostile countries territory
 
To make sure noone is left
A first strike can destroy the vast majority of your nuclear weapons before you even give the command to retaliate.
 
Kikes don't value goyim lives
 
50 won't cause all the nuclear weapons currently in service are not that powerful, talking about around 500 kilotons
truth, 50 nukes arent that much at all.
 
and where did you get this number
 
well you're not going to bomb zimbabwe, with 50 icbms you're destroying every major population center on earth
there is no point attacking every major population center, in a real nuclear war these targets will be the first to be attacked: known nuclear weapons storage sites, known missile launch facilities, fleet locations, military airfields with bombers and aircraft carrying nuclear weapons, military plants/production, major military bases, capital cities (to destroy governments and military commanders) and that only applies to countries that will be at war. There's no point in bombing some niggers in Uganda or mutts in south america.
 
the truth is that Juck Fews
 
well you're not going to bomb zimbabwe, with 50 icbms you're destroying every major population center on earth
If nuclear war breaks out some sites will be nuked several times just in case. Also 50 nukes is not enough to even destroy lets say Russia or China alone, you need at least 100 nukes to eliminate Russia from war and even more in Chinas case. By your logic Russia having over 10000 nukes is also pointless?
 
To wage prolonged war you need more, but if you want to destroy everything in retaliation you don't.

The reason US and Russia have so many nukes is cold war dick measuring contest. You couldn't let the other side have more than you so you constantly produce more
Not true, nukes arent that powerful yet, there is a impact center and thats all. Everything half damaged is considered non eliminated by military. On some locations several nukes would be dropped
 
Israel is small enough that it can be glassed easily with few nuclear weapons.
 
Then why did they have 60k warheads in 1987 and now have less than 10k?
Because Russia got too poor to be able to maintain them all and many of the nuclear weapons were stolen by foreign non Russian agents
 
Samson Option


In 2003, a military historian, Martin van Creveld, thought that the Al-Aqsa Intifada then in progress threatened Israel's existence.[35] Van Creveld was quoted in David Hirst's The Gun and the Olive Branch (2003) as saying:

We possess several hundred atomic warheads and rockets and can launch them at targets in all directions, perhaps even at Rome. Most European capitals are targets for our air force. Let me quote General Moshe Dayan: 'Israel must be like a mad dog, too dangerous to bother.' I consider it all hopeless at this point. We shall have to try to prevent things from coming to that, if at all possible. Our armed forces, however, are not the thirtieth strongest in the world, but rather the second or third. We have the capability to take the world down with us. And I can assure you that that will happen before Israel goes under.
 
Screenshot 2024 02 07 at 75823 in the evening
 
israel has all the nukes in the world
USA's nukes are israeli, Russian nukes are israeli etc
 

Similar threads

Lonelyus
Replies
49
Views
4K
La Grande Infamie
La Grande Infamie
AsiaCel
Replies
31
Views
1K
Fancy Alcoholic
Fancy Alcoholic
Aquiline
Replies
13
Views
782
Julaybib
Julaybib
lonelysince2006
Replies
39
Views
2K
Julaybib
Julaybib

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top