Normies have ruined the word.
OP tbh it was ruined from the beginning, 99% sure Alana Boltwood was MTF and even if ABW was a real biological foid I find it hard to buy that she had anywhere near the difficulty most of us would in finding people wanting to fuck her.
It's actually plausible someone else shortened involuntary celibate to invcel or incel prior to her in the 90s but there's just no historical archive of it.
Given the original use by Antoine Banier was in regard to women as well, it's really poisoned. TBH the only good argument for moving in that direction is Henry's Flint's "Creep" chapter of 1975
Blueprint for a Higher Civilization but I think he'd forgive us if we wanted to brainstorm something different.
A simple tweak (perhaps in a more accurate grammar way) would give us a new term to own.
For example what if instead of voluntary / involuntary we found 2 other contrast terms to describe?
"Sadcel" v "Gladcel" for example.
This would contrast
"those sad they are celibate because they want to have sex with at least one person"
"those happy they are celibate because they convinced themselves they wouldn't fuck anyone"
I actually find this a lot more useful than vol/invol tbh
so we can ban everyone 29 and under? nice
You cant lose with calling our forum uglymales.co
I am concerned that the term 'ugly' may not be strong enough. Consider this:
there are 3 worse rankins we could use