DostoevskyCel
Officer
★
- Joined
- Mar 18, 2021
- Posts
- 551
If you watch an interview with a serial killer like Ed Kemper where he gives his backstory, there are always faggots in the comments saying ‘not defending his actions but [insert source of trauma] would probably make me crazy too’
If you watch one with Ted Bundy, we all know what’s to be found in the comments.
Ergo, there are more normies sympathetic towards mass murderers than incels, and the reason behind this is self evident imo.
Non incel mass murderer: interesting, mysterious, damaged, countless documentaries made about these people
incel mass murderer: disgusting, scum, evil
What’s the difference between the two? One is damaged by society, the other is either born insane or became damaged because of parents, etc, (Ed Kemper’s case). The reason the media whips up hysteria over Rodger but not Jack the Ripper, is because one is a symptom of a degenerated and enfeebled society / culture, while the other can be attributed to being a freak case. If there is evidence of a devolved culture, this damages the media hegemony as they play a huge role in culture. Thoughts?
If you watch one with Ted Bundy, we all know what’s to be found in the comments.
Ergo, there are more normies sympathetic towards mass murderers than incels, and the reason behind this is self evident imo.
Non incel mass murderer: interesting, mysterious, damaged, countless documentaries made about these people
incel mass murderer: disgusting, scum, evil
What’s the difference between the two? One is damaged by society, the other is either born insane or became damaged because of parents, etc, (Ed Kemper’s case). The reason the media whips up hysteria over Rodger but not Jack the Ripper, is because one is a symptom of a degenerated and enfeebled society / culture, while the other can be attributed to being a freak case. If there is evidence of a devolved culture, this damages the media hegemony as they play a huge role in culture. Thoughts?