Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

News Update: Federal appeals court upholds conviction of r/IncelTears user and pedophile Dr. Pizza

PPEcel

PPEcel

cope and seethe
-
Joined
Oct 1, 2018
Posts
29,090
You can read my previous thread on this issue here:

Peterbrightarresttt 2

Earlier this month, a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit unanimously affirmed Dr. Pizza's conviction for attempted child sex enticement.

In April 2019, Dr. Pizza—whose real name is Peter Bright—was caught in an FBI sting operation in which an agent pretended to be a mother offering her two young children for sex. Dr. Pizza was arrested after he met with this undercover agent; condoms were found in his pockets.

In his defense, Dr. Pizza claimed that he had no intention to rape a child but instead sought to engage in "age play". The jury didn't buy it and declared him guilty after a trial in March 2020.

Dr. Pizza appealed. During oral argument in December 2021, his lawyer argued that the district court did not take sufficient care to prevent anti-kink and anti-LGBT bias during jury selection. They also argued that the district court had entered evidence that was "prejudicial, but not probative": exhibits of Dr. Pizza's tweets where he joked about "jailbait".

You can listen to the full argument here:

This month, the Second Circuit sided with federal prosecutors at the U.S. Attorney's Office in Manhattan, and summarily rejected all of Dr. Pizza's arguments in an unsigned opinion. Circuit Judges Gerard E. Lynch, Richard J. Sullivan, and Steven J. Menashi—one Obama appointee, two Trump appointees—all agreed that the district court did not err in its handling of Dr. Pizza's trial.

You can read the full ruling here:


Before his arrest, Dr. Pizza was a frequent poster on r/IncelTears and often tweeted about his dislike of incels. While r/IncelTears is no longer active, you can still find examples of his Tweets, where he frequently expounded his hateful, far-left, incelophobic viewpoints:



Dr. Pizza, whose wife filed for divorce after his arrest, is now considering whether to request an en banc rehearing by the Second Circuit.

For his actions in this case, this obese soycuck is currently serving a 12-year sentence in a medium-security federal prison in Virginia.

@Fat Link @ERadicator @HighTGymcel @Copexodius Maximus @stain @HeroinNihilism @Infinity @JoeBruhcel @Misanthropy1 @Blackpillapologist @Wizard32 @FinnCel @Izayacel @kampman @Justdone @FlyFace @IncelWithHate @Vrthraghna @SlayerSlayer @Lycan @Komesarj89 @Arabcel9 @erenyeager @Defetivecuckachu @XerxesAzrael @Restart80 @Cope_Time @SchrodingersDick @Neetocel @dirtykombatcel @FuRed @BlkPillPres @Mecoja @Arthas93 @Zensfy
 
Last edited:
bet IT wont cover this :feelsclown:
 
[UWSL]Was caught in an FBI sting operation in which an agent pretended to be a mother offering her two young children for sex. [/UWSL]
How can you be this retarded :feelskek:
 
Barbie Doll, Jingaling, Tree Top, Peaches and Strawberry are going to LOVE having Dr. Pizza as a celly. :feelskek:

“If you don’t trust your celly don’t sleep on your belly!” :feelshaha:
 
Barbie Doll, Jingaling, Tree Top, Peaches and Strawberry are going to LOVE having Dr. Pizza as a celly. :feelskek:

“If you don’t trust your celly don’t sleep on your belly!” :feelshaha:
:feelskek::feelskek:
 
During oral argument in December 2021, his lawyer argued that the district court did not take sufficient care to prevent anti-kink and anti-LGBT bias during jury selection.

regarding this tactic the defense used. Does this ever work?
It seems to me like another way of the defense trying to argue that the prosecution went out of their way to make sure dr. Pizza has no chance of an innocent verdict because there are no other pedophiles on the jury. In other words, it sounds insane. Taken to the logical extreme, this makes the argument that the jury in a pedo’s case must be comprised of his pedo peers, the jury in a murderer’s case must be comprised of fellow murderers, etc, and anything else is deemed malicious jury selection on the part of the prosecution. “We want a jury specifically sympathetic to the defendant. If the jurors think bad thoughts about the defendent, or are repulsed by or otherwise feel negatively about his actions, they are unfit to serve on the jury”

how can such a proposition be allowed in a courtroom?

another thing. He brought condoms to have sex with kids? Why?
 
Last edited:
You can read my previous thread on this issue here:

View attachment 565085

Earlier this month, a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit unanimously affirmed Dr. Pizza's conviction for attempted child sex enticement.

In April 2019, Dr. Pizza—whose real name is Peter Bright—was caught in an FBI sting operation in which an agent pretended to be a mother offering her two young children for sex. Dr. Pizza was arrested after he met with this undercover agent; condoms were found in his pockets.

In his defense, Dr. Pizza claimed that he had no intention to rape a child but instead sought to engage in "age play". The jury didn't buy it and declared him guilty after a trial in March 2020.

Dr. Pizza appealed. During oral argument in December 2021, his lawyer argued that the district court did not take sufficient care to prevent anti-kink and anti-LGBT bias during jury selection. They also argued that the district court had entered evidence that was "prejudicial, but not probative": exhibits of Dr. Pizza's tweets where he joked about "jailbait".

You can listen to the full argument here:

This month, the Second Circuit sided with federal prosecutors at the U.S. Attorney's Office in Manhattan, and summarily rejected all of Dr. Pizza's arguments in an unsigned opinion. Circuit Judges Gerard E. Lynch, Richard J. Sullivan, and Steven J. Menashi—one Obama appointee, two Trump appointees—all agreed that the district court did not err in its handling of Dr. Pizza's trial.

You can read the full ruling here:


Before his arrest, Dr. Pizza was a frequent poster on r/IncelTears and often tweeted about his dislike of incels. While r/IncelTears is no longer active, you can still find examples of his Tweets, where he frequently expounded his hateful, far-left, incelophobic viewpoints:



Dr. Pizza, whose wife filed for divorce after his arrest, is now considering whether to request an en banc rehearing by the Second Circuit.

For his actions in this case, this obese soycuck is currently serving a 12-year sentence in a medium-security federal prison in Virginia.

@Fat Link @ERadicator @HighTGymcel @Copexodius Maximus @stain @HeroinNihilism @Infinity @JoeBruhcel @Misanthropy1 @Blackpillapologist @Wizard32 @FinnCel @Izayacel @kampman @Justdone @FlyFace @IncelWithHate @Vrthraghna @SlayerSlayer @Lycan @Komesarj89 @Arabcel9 @erenyeager @Defetivecuckachu @XerxesAzrael @Restart80 @Cope_Time @SchrodingersDick @Neetocel @dirtykombatcel @FuRed @BlkPillPres @Mecoja @Arthas93 @Zensfy

IT user finally found where he belongs
 
They need to give him a deal to implicate the other IncelTear pedos :feelskek:
 
Bad personality detected :feelskek::feelskek:
 
Good now all the other IT members please. :feelsaww:
regarding this tactic the defense used. Does this ever work?
It seems to me like another way of the defense trying to argue that the prosecution went out of their way to make sure dr. Pizza has no chance of an innocent verdict because there are no other pedophiles on the jury. In other words, it sounds insane. Taken to the logical extreme, this makes the argument that the jury in a pedo’s case must be comprised of his pedo peers, the jury in a murderer’s case must be comprised of fellow murderers, etc, and anything else is deemed malicious jury selection on the part of the prosecution. “We want a jury specifically sympathetic to the defendant. If the jurors think bad thoughts about the defendent, or are repulsed by or otherwise feel negatively about his actions, they are unfit to serve on the jury”

how can such a proposition be allowed in a courtroom?
Basically they are saying that criminals of the same calibre as him should be able to decide if he goes to jail. They are openly wanting the jury to be corrupt just to get the retard off. How can the law be free and fair if a jury has a bias? It can't.

Still can't believe he tried to argue being a would be rapist should have the same legal protections as being black. They should have added years just for making it. His entire legal defence was retarded.
Are you serious? :feelskek: That is preposterous.
 
Funny how he tired to argue he was going to do ageplay with two actual children. When you're caught doing the wrong thing, all logic gets thrown out the window.
 
It's over for ITcels :feelskek:
 
You can read my previous thread on this issue here:

View attachment 565085

Earlier this month, a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit unanimously affirmed Dr. Pizza's conviction for attempted child sex enticement.

In April 2019, Dr. Pizza—whose real name is Peter Bright—was caught in an FBI sting operation in which an agent pretended to be a mother offering her two young children for sex. Dr. Pizza was arrested after he met with this undercover agent; condoms were found in his pockets.

In his defense, Dr. Pizza claimed that he had no intention to rape a child but instead sought to engage in "age play". The jury didn't buy it and declared him guilty after a trial in March 2020.

Dr. Pizza appealed. During oral argument in December 2021, his lawyer argued that the district court did not take sufficient care to prevent anti-kink and anti-LGBT bias during jury selection. They also argued that the district court had entered evidence that was "prejudicial, but not probative": exhibits of Dr. Pizza's tweets where he joked about "jailbait".

You can listen to the full argument here:

This month, the Second Circuit sided with federal prosecutors at the U.S. Attorney's Office in Manhattan, and summarily rejected all of Dr. Pizza's arguments in an unsigned opinion. Circuit Judges Gerard E. Lynch, Richard J. Sullivan, and Steven J. Menashi—one Obama appointee, two Trump appointees—all agreed that the district court did not err in its handling of Dr. Pizza's trial.

You can read the full ruling here:


Before his arrest, Dr. Pizza was a frequent poster on r/IncelTears and often tweeted about his dislike of incels. While r/IncelTears is no longer active, you can still find examples of his Tweets, where he frequently expounded his hateful, far-left, incelophobic viewpoints:



Dr. Pizza, whose wife filed for divorce after his arrest, is now considering whether to request an en banc rehearing by the Second Circuit.

For his actions in this case, this obese soycuck is currently serving a 12-year sentence in a medium-security federal prison in Virginia.

@Fat Link @ERadicator @HighTGymcel @Copexodius Maximus @stain @HeroinNihilism @Infinity @JoeBruhcel @Misanthropy1 @Blackpillapologist @Wizard32 @FinnCel @Izayacel @kampman @Justdone @FlyFace @IncelWithHate @Vrthraghna @SlayerSlayer @Lycan @Komesarj89 @Arabcel9 @erenyeager @Defetivecuckachu @XerxesAzrael @Restart80 @Cope_Time @SchrodingersDick @Neetocel @dirtykombatcel @FuRed @BlkPillPres @Mecoja @Arthas93 @Zensfy
 

Attachments

  • 0a1.jpg
    0a1.jpg
    70.2 KB · Views: 167
Virginia eh? :feelshehe:

He’s fucked (and will be fucked most likely) as both I believe After Prison Show Joe, Jay Williams let’s live life and Lockdown 23&1 Josh all did their time in Virginia and I believe all of them have said “Virginia don’t play” when it comes to prison and locking your ass up. :feelswhat:

Dr. Pizza better hope and pray he doesn’t end up in a cell with “Barbie Doll” a.k.a “Dawg” otherwise the video below describes what’s likely in store for him. :feelsohgod:


View: https://youtu.be/Ge_LLJB0WDQ
 
Last edited:
Virginia eh? :feelshehe:

He’s fucked (and will be fucked most likely) as both I believe After Prison Show Joe, Jay Williams let’s live life and Lockdown 23&1 Josh all did their time in Virginia and I believe all of them have said “Virginia don’t play” when it comes to prison and locking your ass up. :feelswhat:

Dr. Pizza better hope and pray he doesn’t end up in a cell with “Barbie Doll” a.k.a “Dawg” otherwise the video below describes what’s likely in store for him. :feelsohgod:


View: https://youtu.be/Ge_LLJB0WDQ

Oh please let dawg be his cell mate :feelshaha:
 
He's your average redditor. A tranny pedophile faggot.

Average reddit mod injecting children with hormones
 
It's hypocritical of this forum to whine about "agecucks" but then laugh at this. Cucked laws :feelsree::feelsree::feelsree: If the children passed a standardized test, they should be allowed to engage in consensual sex with both ITcels and .is members.:feelzez::feelzez::feelzez:
 
regarding this tactic the defense used. Does this ever work?
It seems to me like another way of the defense trying to argue that the prosecution went out of their way to make sure dr. Pizza has no chance of an innocent verdict because there are no other pedophiles on the jury. In other words, it sounds insane. Taken to the logical extreme, this makes the argument that the jury in a pedo’s case must be comprised of his pedo peers, the jury in a murderer’s case must be comprised of fellow murderers, etc, and anything else is deemed malicious jury selection on the part of the prosecution. “We want a jury specifically sympathetic to the defendant. If the jurors think bad thoughts about the defendent, or are repulsed by or otherwise feel negatively about his actions, they are unfit to serve on the jury”

how can such a proposition be allowed in a courtroom?

Well, in every sting operation, intent is the main burden every prosecutor has to prove. Since Bright's defense was that he had no intent to have sex with a child (as opposed to an adult LARPing as a child), it's a fair ask that a juror remove all preconceived biases against age play and judge the defendant based only on the testimony presented at trial.

The appeals court found that the district court did in fact take this into consideration.
 
Will be a regular poster here in 12 years
 
regarding this tactic the defense used. Does this ever work?
It seems to me like another way of the defense trying to argue that the prosecution went out of their way to make sure dr. Pizza has no chance of an innocent verdict because there are no other pedophiles on the jury. In other words, it sounds insane. Taken to the logical extreme, this makes the argument that the jury in a pedo’s case must be comprised of his pedo peers, the jury in a murderer’s case must be comprised of fellow murderers, etc, and anything else is deemed malicious jury selection on the part of the prosecution. “We want a jury specifically sympathetic to the defendant. If the jurors think bad thoughts about the defendent, or are repulsed by or otherwise feel negatively about his actions, they are unfit to serve on the jury”

how can such a proposition be allowed in a courtroom?

another thing. He brought condoms to have sex with kids? Why?
High IQ af
 
IT won’t touch this.
 
@PPEcel

EuightPizza


thoughts?
 
So wait, a bit off topic, but r/IncelTears is no longer active, but there is a r/IncelTear. Isn't that ban evasion?

Also, the retard got what he deserved. Hope he rots.
 
So wait, a bit off topic, but r/IncelTears is no longer active, but there is a r/IncelTear. Isn't that ban evasion?

IT is the lowest-ranked lapdog/henchman of the mainstream media, even the wokest liberals of reddit are disgusted by them.
The only reason they got the green light is because they are happily dissing (even if in a very primitive manner) a group that is even more hated than they are: us.
 
So wait, a bit off topic, but r/IncelTears is no longer active, but there is a r/IncelTear. Isn't that ban evasion?

Also, the retard got what he deserved. Hope he rots.
they didn't get banned tbh
i heard the owner cringed when he saw all the pedos and landwhales on IT and shut it down
 
(even if in a very primitive manner)
:feelskek::feelskek::feelskek::feelskek::feelskek: It's funny because it's true. :feelsthink:
they didn't get banned tbh
i heard the owner cringed when he saw all the pedos and landwhales on IT and shut it down
I mean, I've cringed so hard at them I've puked. :feelspuke::feelspuke: It's quite believable. :feelsthink:
 
Well, what else apart from child abuse and sexual perversion can we expect from rabid incelophobic bigots, who are spewing hate at one of the most oppressed groups of the Western soYciety: the Incels!?:smonk:
 
The absolute state of ITcucks

Share this whenever you can
 

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top